As for parvo, there are examples in my book of vaccinated pups dying of it, with
expert opinion stating it was vaccine - induced.
Not exact matches
But those
expert opinions seem largely confined to attributing last month's DNC hack itself to Russian
state actors.
Rahn... Do i really need to back up what i think online... and you being the
expert... why do nt you fully explain to me the
state that the country is in... enlighten me... but you already know how far that will go... just as my attempt to change others mind's fell short... so will any others
opinion... i have my mind made up for my own well founded reasons... all im saying is that spending all day protesting and postulating is of no benefit to anyone... going about your life and making things best for yourself is in the best interest of this country as a whole... I believe Adam Smith said it best... the best results come from one person doing whats best for himself and the team... not throwing a hissy fit
The articles featured attention grabbing headings, highlighting issues pertaining to the
state of maternity services, supplemented by a range of
expert opinions including the relevant government authority, medical or obstetric
experts, Australian College of Midwives (ACM) and consumer groups.
Since the «actual» story comes out of the mouth of the «
expert» rather than reported by the outlet directly, if pressured, the news outlet has plausible deniability, since it can always back out of the claims
stating it was only an
opinion piece, and the views of the
expert do not necessarily reflect those of the outlet.
The evening will also see the launch of Britain in 2014, the ESRC's definitive annual magazine featuring key data and
expert opinion on the
state of the nation today.
Within the first paragraph of their review, they
state that «women have the right to feel sexual pleasure, and for this reason sexual medicine
experts and sexologists must spread certainties on the biological basis to all women, not hypotheses or personal
opinions, and they must use scientific sexual terminology.»
To identify the present and future
state of deep - sea ecosystems, we used a combination of
expert opinion, current literature, and the output of the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) models.
In this special in - depth briefing, BoF examines the
state of fashion education, with
expert analysis,
opinions and contributions from across the fashion spectrum.
Until we have comprehensive research findings on the many recently implemented
state supports and interventions, the
expert opinions of SEA personnel are our best sources of information.
Senior Ministry official Liu Qiang
stated, «The list is the result of evaluations by investigators, reviews by the ministry and the
opinions of
experts.
Hence it would be best to get an
expert's
opinion about the core
state of your potential future home.
The Canadian economy will get back to its former stable and sustainable
state in the coming year according to the popular
opinion amongst economists and
experts in the country.
NC
State's Dentistry and Oral Surgery team offer a range of treatment specialties from oral hygiene lessons and
expert opinion on common oral conditions to advanced endodontics and Orofacial surgery.
The 2014 «Minimum Standards of Horse Care in the
State of California» and the 2011 Cattle Care Standards: Recommendations for Meeting California Legal Requirements» provide the
expert opinions of the authors regarding minimum standards of care with respect to California animal cruelty statutes.
The
opinions of different veterinarians and
experts vary on the topic of bones, with some saying that raw bones are OK and some
stating that no bone is safe.
Designed to be practical, they are also based on scientific data and
expert opinion,»
stated Dr. Brian DiGangi, DVM, MS, DABVP, Clinical Associate Professor of Shelter Medicine at the University of Florida, Chairman of the Position Statement Committee, and President of the Association of Shelter Veterinarians Executive Board.
How much spare time each week do you have to read all the relevant credible published science papers already available for years, and read existing reports by govt / science / economic / agri bodies on the subject matters, and read the
state of current research / know how of existing anecdotal narrow focused regional / local analysis and the
opinions of
experts in their particular field... and then deeply think about all that and come to a rational and reasonable conclusion on it all?
Subjects holding hierarchical and individualistic outlooks, on the one hand, and ones holding egalitarian and communitarian outlooks, click me for a closer look!on the other, significantly disagreed about the
state of
expert opinion on climate change, nuclear waste disposal, and handgun regulation.
Our study describes the
state of
expert opinion, it does not define scientific truth nor does it tell people what to think.
The goal is not to reach a potentially «watered - down» compromise that conceals scientific uncertainties or real differences in
expert opinion, but to produce a report of the highest scientific integrity, reflecting the
state of our understanding fairly and adequately.
Maybe you're smarter than the predominant
opinion among
experts — but two questions need to be asked: (1) to what degree is your view of the evidenced biased by your ideological identity (you clearly have a very strong ideological identity on this issue) and, (2) how could you possibly
state a certainty about such a counterfactual in such a highly uncertain context?
, my guess is that, being a
state flunkey and apologist for untrammeled political controls over society, you value the
opinion of those «
experts» with whom you share a paymaster.
Indeed, in a motion arguing against the independent
expert, Google
stated its fear that such an
expert «will have a powerful stamp of court approval and objectivity that will lend a disproportionate weight to that
expert's
opinions and testimony.»
It is of some interest that his scientific
opinion in this regard has changed over the years, evidenced by the
expert opinion he rendered in Charbonneau v. ICBC, 1991 New Westminster Registry C890102 (B.C.S.C.), where Justice Mackinnon
stated that Dr. York was «emphatic» that the plaintiff had rheumatoid arthritis and that it was precipitated by an accident.
These standards will prevent Wisconsin
state courts from being bogged down with cases based on «junk science,» and will discourage cases of questionable merit from being brought in Wisconsin because of weaker
expert opinion evidence standards.
In 2010, Rule 53.03 of the Rules of Civil Procedure was amended to outline what documents are to be disclosed to the other side regarding
expert evidence, including the instructing letter, the report, and now a Form 53 signed by the
expert stating that they will provide
opinion evidence that is fair, objective and non-partisan.
A psychologist can give an
opinion on your mental
state after you have sustained an injury, as
expert evidence to back up your personal injury claim.
In R v Turner [1975] QB 834, a case which concerned the admissibility of
opinion evidence... Lawton LJ
stated at p 841: «If on the proven facts a judge or jury can form their own conclusions without help, then the
opinion of an
expert is unnecessary.»
A separate trial for Kenny, according to the then
state of the
expert medical
opinion evidence, a lesser player in the unlawful death of Brian Fudge, was at once viable, reasonable and in the interests of justice.
The three analogies: (1) whereas a pre-electronic paper record can be symbolized by a piece of paper in a file drawer, an electronic record is like a drop of water in a pool of water, i.e., it is completely dependent upon its ERMS for its existence, accessibility, and «integrity» (as that word is used in the electronic records provisions of the Evidence Acts; e.g. s. 31.2 (1)(a) CEA); (2) if
expert opinion evidence were rendered admissible in the way that electronic records are, there would be no evidence presented, nor cross-examination allowed, as to the qualifications of the
expert witnesses, i.e., the «qualifications» of an electronic record being the
state of records management of the ERMS in which it is stored; (3) going from a horse - powered transportation system to a motor vehicle - based transportation system has required a vast amount of new laws, regulations, and enforcement personnel, including police officers, judges, and lawyers, i.e., stepping up to a new technology requires that it be controlled by new laws and regulations, otherwise it will cause injury, damage, and injustice.
[12] In any event, the proposed evidence is also truly responsive as a rebuttal to the
opinion of another
expert witness called by the CN defendants, Dr. Baker, whose report entered at Tab 1 of Exhibit 61
states:
The Rules of Court in force at the time of this trial required an
expert to
state «the facts and assumptions upon which the
opinion is based».
[42] New Rule 11 - 6 expands on what an
expert was required to
state under old Rule 40A, but does not alter the general principle that it is essential for the trier of fact to know the basis of an
expert opinion so that the
opinion can be evaluated.
The
opinion evidence was also, in principle, admissible in so far as the
opinions stated were those of qualified
experts on subjects involving special expertise.
We would like to invite you and your client to meet with us to discuss an alternative means to resolve this matter in a way that is fair to our clients and respects the mandate of yours... We are of the
opinion that, viewed objectively, the
state of the evidence to this point demonstrates that this prosecution has no reasonable prospect of success... You have no evidence to respond to our
experts and, it seems to us, no reasonable basis to expect they will be disbelieved... We think you will agree that an objective review of Mr. Marschdorf's evidence exposes serious weaknesses in the prosecution case and significant areas of agreement between the defence and your only witness... You are dependent on a theory advanced by Mr. Osborne which misconceives the law.
So far, nothing has been done to improve the
state of
expert opinion evidence in the Ontario personal injury context.
Below, Bill Waite, CEO of The Risk Advisory Group, a London - based leading, independent global risk management consultancy, attempts to amalgamate the extent of said potential, and gives his
expert opinion on the prospective of an ironically «isolated» United
States of America.
These defendants questioned the validity of the so called
expert reports, brought as evidence against them, mainly on the basis that they deemed these
experts insufficiently qualified to make judgements on the matter, and
stated that their
opinions were not properly explained.
The good news is Georgia appellate cases have made it clear that an
expert only has to
state their
expert medical
opinion on what caused the injury in a way that is stronger than that of medical possibility.
For example, Tom has been instructed to provide
opinions for use in four separate claims before the South Korean courts, and has travelled to Texas to act as an
expert witness in proceedings before the Dallas
State Court.
Born 1950; lawyer (1974 - 80); law degree from the University of Athens (1973); diploma of advanced studies (DEA) in labour law from the University of Paris II, Panthéon - Sorbonne (1977); national
expert with the Legal Service of the Commission of the European Communities (1988 - 1990), then Principal Administrator in Directorate General V (Employment, Industrial Relations, Social Affairs)(1990 - 1994); Junior Officer, Junior Member and, since 1999, Member of the Greek Council of
State; Associate Member of the Superior Special Court of Greece; Member of the Central Legislative Drafting Committee of Greece (1996 - 98); Director of the Legal Service in the General Secretariat of the Greek Government (1996 - 1998); Judge at the General Court of the European Union (1998 to 2010, President of Chamber from 2004 to 2010); Member of the Supreme Council for Administrative Justice (2011 - 2012); Member of the Special Court for Disputes relating to the Remuneration of Judges and of the Special Court for Actions against Judges (2013 - 2014); Member of the Advisory Panel of
Experts on Candidates for Election as Judge to the European Court of Human Rights (2014 - 2015); Member of the Committee responsible for giving an
Opinion on Candidates» Suitability to perform the Duties of Judge at the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (2012 - 2015); Lecturer in European Law at the National School for the Judiciary (1995 - 1996 and 2012 - 2015); Judge at the Court of Justice since 7 October 2015.
In General Electric Co. v. Joiner, the United
States Supreme Court said that there is nothing in Daubert or the Federal Rules of Evidence that requires a trial court «to admit
opinion evidence which is connected to existing data only by the ipse dixit of the
expert.
It may help with understanding particular cases, but as is
stated by the editor, it is not a substitute for specific
expert opinion.
Some clients will not readily understand when an
expert's report does not completely or largely support their case, or when the
expert prefers the other party's version of events or
states an
opinion which appears to be critical of the client.
Requiring
experts to
state their
opinion in the presence of their peers may promote more measured
opinions.
To highlight this, he said that it was not sufficient for
experts simply to be asked whether their
opinion was orthodox and mainstream, but
experts should also be asked to report: - what the range of orthodox
opinion might be; and - whether, within that range of
opinion, the cause of injury could be
stated as unknown or undetermined.
The said compliance team may appoint or engage any advocate or
expert from within and / or outside the Company to seek their
opinion in carrying out their responsibilities as
stated under this IP Policy.
The Zebra's own licensed insurance agent and advisor Neil Richardson shares his
expert opinions on our biggest questions about driving out of
state.
According to him,
opinions and suggestions were collected from representatives of the NBU, the Ministry of Finance and other
state bodies and
experts in order to draft a bill on cryptocurrency.