Let's see what
experts say about the matter.
Not exact matches
Traditionally, judges have been extremely cautious
about stepping on the executive branch's authority in such
matters, legal
experts said.
An electronics
expert who
says that he is a «regular reader» of Thistle Diary has written to me
about a
matter which concerns him greatly: the increasing use of telephone lines for electronic communications.
«There is very little doubt that Japan will go whaling in the next Antarctic season no
matter what
experts say about it.»
Lots of wonderful controversy exists
about protein, as some
experts say that we need animal protein, other
experts champion vegetarian sources of protein, while other scientists
say that protein is protein and it doesn't
matter where it comes from.
Just like in my last post
about this, let me preface by
saying that I'm no
expert in the
matter.
Instead, he made up something that RC never
said (see emulation # 2 in post 17), and artificially introduced the notion that RC thought the Thompson et al. issue never
mattered, when gavin emphatically wanted to reduce the noise brought
about by speculation and wait for the
experts to do the analysis.
In fact, in the pilots, I would
say that only
about 10 percent of the subject
matter experts were Ph.D. biophysical scientists.
What
about the «warmers», your global warming
experts who
says it's for real no
matter what the best scientist facts are debunking the money grab of Gore and his scam.
But they go on to
say that the attorney must remain regularly engaged in the
expert's work and educate everyone in the case involved
about the legal issues in the case, the factual
matters impacting the case, witnesses, evidentiary issues, all of that stuff the lawyer has to stay on top of that.
Like Peter
said, it's not necessarily
about adding lawyers but it's
about where the work should reside, whether it's a paraprofessional, a junior lawyer, a more specialized subject
matter expert or compliance
expert.