Discounting evolution becuase it does not
explain abiogenesis is like discounting the belief gases because it does not predict the weather.
Physics does a great job describing accretion, as well as origin of our solar system, but past that, it becomes the chemist and biochemist jobs to
explain abiogenesis.
Not exact matches
The extreme mathematical improbability of random
abiogenesis has also been
explained.
I've never claimed to be an expert, please
explain to me then how «
Abiogenesis» is supposed to work.
eg: «science doesn't
explain what happened before the big bang, so God is real, ergo he created everything 6,000 years ago» — Opponents of
abiogenesis belong here too.
After spending years studying quantum physics what causes me the most side splitting rounds of laughter is when someone with no foundation attempts to
explain «life» in terms of
abiogenesis dealing strictly with already complex atomic structure.