Sentences with phrase «explain at least some of»

Thus, while Governor Patrick has a much larger following, it appears as if social media tactics, as opposed to pure content or «celeb power» explain at least some of that difference.

That would explain at least some of your recent celebratory mood:) Congratulations.

In a paper just published in Nature, Christian Schoof explores this complexity and explains at least some of it.

Defined degrees of BS, explained at least some of the BS manufacturing methods, what to look for (red flags), how to fast «fact check», and such.

Not exact matches

Biotech is a «crazy» industry, in that there's no easy way to measure a company's worth, because actually helping patients is at least 10 years away, explains Brian Bloom, president of Bloom, Burton & Co., a Toronto - based investment bank focused on the health - care sector.

He explained that the current Eurogroup President Jeroen Dijsselbloem, who's also the Dutch finance minister, gathers significant support among the other finance ministers but failed to get enough backing to continue with his European role after having lost the general election, putting an end, at least for now, to the idea of a permanent president.

FireEye chief executive Dave DeWall explained that sales of cyber security products jumped last year in light of major hacks on corporations but he doesn't see that trend continuing (at least for FireEye).

New Dimensions sells car parts, which explains at least part of Hildabrand's obsession.

If FUBU had failed, he explained, at least he wouldn't have run up huge debts just to live, and run the risk of going bankrupt personally or ruining his credit rating.

After all, Musk explained, he spends at least 90 % of his time on either the electric car company or SpaceX; 3 % to 5 % on Neuralink, a venture aiming to create interfaces between the human brain and machine - learning technology; 2 % on his new tunneling project called the Boring Company; and the remainder on OpenAI, a non-profit dedicated to artificial intelligence research.

What it's all about I can't remember now; but it often stimulates me, if not to write that identical plot, at least to write something else,» she explained of the useful chaos in her notebooks.

Writing in the majority opinion, Justice Antonin Scalia explained, «California has singled out the purveyors of video games for disfavored treatment — at least when compared to booksellers, cartoonists and movie producers — and has given no persuasive reason why.»

At least half of the June rebound is explained by the oil rebound, though the Pan Am Games in Toronto played a positive role as well.

On the other, the tendency to be credulous towards astrology is at least partially explained by what people know about science - but also what kind of personality traits they have.

Matt explained that volunteers must be at least 16 years old, and must be able to commit to a minimum of eight hours per month for a minimum of six months.

Journalist Sam Biddle explained that the documents show that the NSA «worked urgently to target Bitcoin users around the world — and wielded at least one mysterious source of information to «help track down senders and receivers of Bitcoins.»»

At least Mr. Bernanke was clear about this, when he explained that the Fed «creates deposits» for its member banks just as these banks «create deposits» for their own customers at a stroke of the computer keyboarAt least Mr. Bernanke was clear about this, when he explained that the Fed «creates deposits» for its member banks just as these banks «create deposits» for their own customers at a stroke of the computer keyboarat a stroke of the computer keyboard.

Singapore seems to be transferring a large share of the assets it buys to its sovereign wealth fund: that at least is how I explain the large rise in «official» deposits in the balance of payments data.

The sentiment seemed widespread on tech and media Twitter: there was a lack of specificity in terms of questions about privacy (this allowed Zuckerberg to turn nearly every question about the ownership of data to a discussion about user interface controls that limit where data is shown to other Facebook users), plenty of dodged questions (every time there was a question about the data Facebook generates about users beyond what they themselves enter into the system Zuckerberg needed to «check with his team»), and bad questions that presumed Facebook sells data, letting Zuckerberg run out the clock at least three times by explaining the basics of Facebook's business model (this is precisely why I have been so outspoken about the problem of perpetrating this falsehood: it lets Facebook off the hook).

«The model of coworking in restaurants is still very new, but we find that most hospitality owners are at least aware of the concept of coworking,» Levy explained.

Linda Sherry, director of national priorities at Consumer Action explains that «a minimum payment on a credit card is the least amount you must pay by the due date to avoid a late fee.»

Explaining the relation between the Fed's creation (or destruction) of bank reserves and banks» creation (or destruction) of deposits takes a little effort, not in the least because doing so means confronting the different ways in which economists on one hand and bankers and banking consultants on the other look at the process, and deciding whether the difference is due to substantive disagreement, or mere semantics.

Similarly, if we had written a blog post explaining the Google Knowledge Graph based off of just one news outlet's understanding of the change, we could easily pass along incorrect information, or at the very least not present the entire scope of the story.

In the 1982 Letter to Shareholders of Berkshire Hathaway, Warren Buffett included spent a few paragraphs explaining the accounting realities that come into play based on whether or not you own at least 20 % of a company in which you invest.

As explained in our strategy and rules for swing trading, stocks and ETFs trading at or near their 52 - week highs have the least amount of overhead resistance, and therefore have the greatest ability to move sharply higher with the least amount of effort.

Just as an example, GRAVITY or at least our system of laws, rules, concepts, and equations explaining it is a THEORY.

And while science may not have as yet explained all the unexplained things in our universe, it has to begin to be seen as, at the very least, having explained enough that we can reasonably dismiss most, if not all, beliefs of this nature.

His faith was often a kind of secret which, once noticed, could explain at least in part his choice of themes and subjects.

At least one place Lewis explains this problem was in the Screwtape letters, where a demon exclaims, «How much better for us if all humans died in costly nursing homes amid doctors who lie, nurses who lie, friends who lie, as we have trained them, promising life to the dying, encouraging the belief that sickness excuses every indulgence, and even, if our workers know their job, withholding all suggestion of a priest lest it should betray to the sick man his true condition!»

And By the way... 1 in 50 would be only 2 %... the number of gay priests and higher is quite a bit higher than the world average, and higher than in any other religion... which is explained (at least in theory of why that is the case) in the frontline I saw... they estimated it is closer to one in 5

Yet, as Mark points out, we all agree that love, etc. exist — primarily because we have a «shared experience» of them; i.e., we can «explain,» at least in basic terms that others can understand, what those things are.

Christian churches (at least the fundamental ones I've attended) have been quite adept at deconstructing the ancient jots and tittles of Scripture only to reconstruct vague mottos that everyone repeats and claims to live by but no one can explain to those who ask.

But the lines that immediately follow attempt to explain why — at least within the terms of the Deleuzean chaosmos itself — this moment of attempting to «think the unthinkable» is, at the limit, ineliminable:

Once upon a time, I thought that the Christian faith, or at least the purest version of it, had started with Jesus and his disciples, taken a hiatus for about a thousand years during the reign of Roman Catholicism, returned with Martin Luther and the Protestant Reformation, and gotten properly explained again by the 1895 Bible Conference of Conservative Protestants.

He explained: «Since then, 8,894,355 abortions have been carried out, and at least that number of unborn children have lost their lives.

The focus on healing explains the relative de-emphasis in Christian Science — at least as contrasted with mainstream Protestantism — on the social dimension of Christian witness.

I would add, following the example of the best American Catholic «public philosophers» John Courtney Murray and Orestes Brownson, that we should, as loyal Americans [we Porchers and REM fans are all about standing for the place where we live], actually explain why our Fathers built better than they knew — which means criticizing their thinking and affirming [most of] their practice with a theory that at least wasn't completely their own.

However suspicious we may be of the sources of this material, it does at least show that there was an empty tomb that needed explaining.

At the least, it offers up a few more questions for proponents of gay marriage and explains the cautiousness of social conservatives to give weigh to libertarian ideals.

A book I was reading the other day had a list of at least 10,000 credible, phD, research scientists that believed evolution was bunk and creationsim was a better way to explain ALL of the evidence.

At first glance, Feuerbach's later theory looks like an elaboration of a view that goes back at least to the Roman poet Statius and was revived by Spinoza, Hobbes, Hume and others: that fear of the terrifying forces of nature first created the gods — «in the ignorance of causes,» as Hobbes explainAt first glance, Feuerbach's later theory looks like an elaboration of a view that goes back at least to the Roman poet Statius and was revived by Spinoza, Hobbes, Hume and others: that fear of the terrifying forces of nature first created the gods — «in the ignorance of causes,» as Hobbes explainat least to the Roman poet Statius and was revived by Spinoza, Hobbes, Hume and others: that fear of the terrifying forces of nature first created the gods — «in the ignorance of causes,» as Hobbes explains.

Indeed, filling in that gap may help to explain — for this reader, does help to explain — at least part of what makes the Chronicles so alluring as a work of Christian literary imagination.

The point is that, having demonstrated that design is required to explain at least one part of an organism, whether or not it is present elsewhere becomes wholly irrelevant, because one need only demonstrate that design was required in one aspect to show that a designer mustexist.

I agree with the advocates of Intelligent Design at least to this extent: that Darwinism can not explain chemical complexity.

I am not prepared to explain or defend any alternate views on these other passages, but I am at least aware of alternative views that I can not easily dismiss without further research and study.

The Catholic principle of subsidiary, while officially extolled everywhere in Europe today, is at least somewhat more alive, as Tocqueville explained, in the virtuous voluntary activity relatively prevalent in our country, in the virtue displayed, for example, in THE BLIND SIDE.

Please explain to my ignorant worldview how Romans 1:18 - 32 does not at least speak of homosexual activity as perversion and how 1 Corinthians 6 does not speak against the homosexual act when the Greek Paul used clearly states in his sin list both partners in the homosexual act.

In a conversation between a Spirit who resides in heaven, and a Ghost, who was an artist on earth, the Spirit explains to the Ghost, «When you painted on earth — at least in your earlier days — it was because you caught glimpses of Heaven in the earthly landscape.

Without such polygamy, most of the women likely would have starved... At least, this is how it was explained to the European missionaries who came to teach the Gospel to this particular Native American tribe.

But at least some of the questions we face are different from the questions Paul faced, and in order to answer those questions, we may need to explain the Gospel in new ways.