Not exact matches
In the 1950s, Richard Hofstadter, Daniel Bell, and others employed this theory to
explain the
emergence of a political right wing in American public
life.
What he
explained was not how there is cosmic order, with physical, chemical, astronomical laws; he assumed all that, and then
explained how the
emergence of living forms, vegetable and animal, could have occurred.
The process
of synthesis by which azoic elements have reached their present multiplicity and complexity is an evolution, the same process entirely as the biologist traces in the order
of living things, and the synthetic chemical compound embodies in itself a complex relativity capable
of being expressed in most exact laws, which reflect the evolutionary
emergence of its substance as much as do the organs
of an animal
explained in terms
of evolutionary development.