Sentences with phrase «explain everything in the universe»

Atheist align with science, which can not YET explain everything in the universe, but a great deal of it.

Now lets look at the answer from the opposite side, the creationists explanation for the universe is «Let There Be Light» in a mere 4 words you explain everything in the universe; if you want to believe in that then be my guest but this is outright comical and absurd.

Not exact matches

The burden of proof is on the atheist to explain how everything in our universe is ordered.

now as far as science it seeks the most realible and testible idea about everything in the universe to attempt to explain what we are dealing with; it would be a sad world to live in if science simply said «GOD DID IT» GIVE THAT SOME THOUGHT;

the audacity of pride and science to be able to explain everything in the known (and apparently unknown) universe.

The theist, on the other hand, it quite smugly certain that he has all teh answers to life, the universe and everything explained neatly in a single book and reacts with hostility and derision when anyone refutes the contents of said book.

In # 4, you say that there is an unseen wholeness to everything: for years, physicists have been searching for what they call the «unified theory,» one theory that will explain the physical properties of the universe and not break down at the very small or very large levels.

what is very interesting to me tonite is the folks who are positive there is no god... what is equally interesting is the snarling that appears whenever one does not «toe» the atheist line of no god... It has been said over and over here, «there is no proof of your God» ad nauseum I might add... OK... please, I am asking you in the nicest possible way... explain to me, without a Designed, where the universe and all it entails, first got its source... I really would like to know... from everything I see, I see beauty, design, tragedy, poetry, poverty, etc.... How did we begin to name or classify any of this... what intelligence gave us our intelligence... I have yet to see an anwer posited as to how it all came about, absent a Designer... I will wait for an answer... How did it ALL get here, and explain the precision and engineering of it all — right down to the last jot of DNA.

Secondly, if you're looking for me to explain EVERYTHING about the universe (and anything that might be outside it) in order to believe in a creator that's just not going to happen.

Solve for us the question of the reasonableness of athiesm, where you get something (big bang) from nothing — there must be a first cause of everything; explain implications of the anthropic principle and the wildly unprobablistic likelihood that our universe could even form in such a fashion as to be capable of sustaining life (which has, interestingly, your athiest heavy hitters (i.e. Dawkins, Schwartz, etc.) necessarily positing multiple universe theories to get around the near probablistic impossibility of all conditions be present at time of big bang for life to be possible without acknowledgement of a divine designing hand guiding the process); explain The probablistic impossibility of non-irreducibly complex basic cells (life) coming together spontaneously (DNA, cell membrane, etc), even the most basic, simple forms of life allowing for reproduction, metabolism, etc...

Everything that happens in our universe that we have observed so far is able to be explained through purely natural means and laws.

Instead of being confronted with the ancient problem of how to explain death if everything around us exudes life, we now have to apologize for the precarious fact of life (and consciousness) if everything around us in our universe is intrinsically dead and mindless.

The result was that contemporary man often had the impression that he no longer needs anyone in order to understand, explain and dominate the universe; he feels the centre of everything, the measure of everything.

But as all physicists know, the standard model doesn't explain everything — it accounts for less than 20 percent of the matter in the universe, for instance — the rest is invisible or «dark» and can not be made of the ordinary matter particles found on Earth.

Einstein's theory of general relativity explains almost everything large scale in the universe very well, but starts to unravel when examining its origins and mechanisms at quantum level.

Such a discovery would be a big step toward developing a unified description of the four fundamental forces — the «theory of everything» that would explain all the basic interactions in the universe.

The universe is a computer, and everything that goes on in it can be explained in terms of information processing.

A recent article in the Daily Telegraph commented: «Gell - Mann's conviction is that it is indeed possible to know it all, that in principle there is nothing to prevent the future day when sovereign science will be able to explain absolutely everything, in a single coherent picture of how the universe works.»

And this is something that physicists have been arguing about for a very, very long time, but what the authors of this article point out is that the work by John Bell, but also some more recent experimental work, seems to indicate that in fact there really is a deep nonlocality to the universe; that there really is someway in which there is not some sort of missing x-factor that if we just knew what it was that would explain everything; that we would see the dominos connecting, those invisible tiny dominos connecting those different particles and set up the effect of going one to the other.

Just as Darwin explained how single - celled creatures could evolve into species after species, so B2FH explained how single - proton atoms could eventually form everything in the universe.

If religion is right, what is the point of science when everything in the universe can be explained by a higher power creating and controlling all?

If science is right, what is the point of religion when everything in the universe can be explained by equations and formulas?

I don't actually like ascribing anything to chance, but between chaos theory, quantum theory, Newtonian physics and the shear number of causal relationships in the universe, I can't explain everything in detail.

This introductory post will explain everything about how the blockchain works, and the role it plays in the universe of cryptocurrency!