Sentences with phrase «explain what the point»

Since they saved this administration, they have a duty now to explain what the point of it is to the country.

This curved screen is SO dumb — no one has ever explained what the point is — and as the reviewer says, it cuts the top & bottom off movies and games — everything.

Not exact matches

«Companies like Rubikloud are trying to figure out, now that we have all of these devices and objects connected to the Internet, what does this mean in terms of the data points that are being collected, and what can we bring to a shopper's experience to help optimize it,» explains McGill.

And that point — an important nuance lost in the clutter — alludes to what Mast told me at the beginning of our conversation when he explained why he got into the chocolate business.

Albright pointed to research from the Belgian university KU Leuven explaining what data was included in those extended profile properties — that is, exactly which data developers could access from your Facebook friends once you gave the app permission.

No need to think about what your decision will be at this point, just explain what's happened so far.

By keeping it short, personalized and to the point, you save the reader time while at the same time explaining what you want to sell them.

«The point of this bill in those states that get a waiver to do what they need to do to make it work better in their particular states has support exactly for that very person who, if, in the course between a year, get extra aid for support for pre-existing conditions,» Ryan explained, citing what he said were successful examples in Wisconsin and Maine.

Moore acknowledged the concern but overruled him; what Moore couldn't explain was that as one of the people who had devised the exercise, he knew that the landing party wouldn't be discovered at that point.

The problem at that point is that once the required minimum distribution starts, they end up being forced to take more money than what they necessarily need at that point, and they get thrust into a higher tax rate,» explain Plessl and Houser.

At this point, I think you need to go back to her, apologize for not giving her the full context earlier, and explaining what your boss has asked you to do.

A person will answer your call and will thoroughly explain why your application got rejected and what points you should reconsider before applying again.

Facebook confirmed the launch to TechCrunch, pointing to its Newsroom and Developer News blog posts from the last few weeks that explained that «We already show people what apps their accounts are connected to and control what data they've permitted those apps to use.

So what was the point of the call? Political optics, obviously — which explains why the PMO's subsequent spin effort was more important than the phone call itself.

Having explained what's happening to the economy by pointing at seemingly random / unpredictable events or citing unfathomable changes in «aggregate demand», the economist's second job is to recommend a course of action.

As to what «matters» that «count», wouldn't you agree that such a subjective question would only generate a subjective answer if I were to explain how these matters «count» according to my personal point of view?

When Judas went back and try to give back the 30 silver coins he did so because he felt remorse, now there is a huge difference between remorse and repentance, which I don't have time to explain here, my point is let's not be ignorant of the Scriptures, we have to dig in real deep so that we can understand what it is trying to tell us.

A reasoable point to argue, I suppose — I will add this: If this is NOT what Islam brings to the table, then where are the throngs of Muslims speaking out to explain that this is NOT what their religion actually stands for?

«If you spend your time in session talking about what God thinks and what the Bible says, you don't get to understand what the patient thinks and what happened in their life up to that point that explains why,» Giugliano says.

Yet, as Mark points out, we all agree that love, etc. exist — primarily because we have a «shared experience» of them; i.e., we can «explain,» at least in basic terms that others can understand, what those things are.

, avoids discussion of many moral sticking points of the next few millennia (even though he knew in advance they'd be sticking points and could have provided clearer guidance), and then makes one of the central points of the entire story — and his entire reason for being here really — a personal sacrifice that is so va.gue that no one can even explain how or what was, in fact, sacrificed.

@tru — Yes, you got the gist of what I was wanting to say, except that I attempted to explain as best I could what you summarized in the first two points, but as for the «don't ask» part, I still think this is a very important question.

Yes, this was Paul's point, and he also is aware of this question, which is why he goes on in chapters 6 - 8 to explain what God has done about the death.

That is the basic point of Romans 5:13, but let me explain it in more detail because there is something extremely profound in what Paul goes on to say.

(I apologize to those that dislike metaphors, but I almost can't communicate if I don't get to use them, and as insufficient as they at times are, they are very close to the language of what I believe, because you can't really explain or define someone into believing... you can only live out your beliefs in a way that you share with others, and when given the opportunity shine a light, or point a direction, or walk along with someone for a bit).

Obviously, there are always new things proven by science that explain what people in the past have attributed to things super natural and they seem silly at this point, but that's not the case for everything.

Communion... well, I can't explain exactly what happens in communion, and I'm beginning to wonder if maybe that's the point.

Starting backwards with Coll's fourth point, that it is what deacons and deaconesses are rather than what they do that is significant for the Church, Coll explains that on the issue of ordination generally, the «ontological» versus «functional» debate continues (p207).

You've successfully and succinctly explained exactly what I tried to point out in my lengthy rant above.

Frequently, when the family of a patient came to visit, they'd make a point of explaining what the patient had been like before the illness.

You should have been able to figure that out, and go right on explaining what you think the point is.

None of the laws of matter or physics or gravity or decay or thermodynamics or electro - magnetism can explain what made that point change from a stable condition.

the belief on the existence of the devil was concieved by theologians of the past thousands of years, there was no other way of explaining the bad experiences of people in the past because we were not educated yet to the kind of what we have now, Why this happened because that was part of the learning process that God wants us to know, in pathrotheism, we are part of God, and He himself is evolving because He is the universe, We are now the conscious part of Him, our destiny in accordance to his will also be His destiny because it is His will.Although He prepared first all the material reality of the universe ahead of us, The experiences for us humans including the supernatural is just part of nirmal process for learning because its natural process, today we reach a point of not believing the practices of the past, but it does not mean its wrong, Just like a child, adults loved to tell mythical stories to them, because we knew children enjoys it as part of their learning process.

Now, to go back to the point I left open at the start of this post, what evolution does not explain (nor attempt to) is how the first complex living things arose.

My point is that religions are for the most part fabrications of man to explain the word and will of God...» Not sure what points you think are swaying in the wind but in any case, in this instance, you apparently missed my point entirely.

normally at this point you just completely ignore the information and just accuse me of lying (never actually explaining exactly what I am lying about)..

Here Whitehead and Russell emphasize «the primitive ideas are by means of descriptions intended to point out to the reader what is meant; but the explanations do not constitute definitions, because they really involve the ideas they explain» (PM 91).

We can point out what they have done well and explain how they can improve things that can be done better.

On this final point, although G. Delling says that «According to Acts 13:48 the man who is a Christian is ordained to eternal life,» he explains what the verse menas by writing this:

We say that the whole of science points to God, not because of what we can't explain but because of what we can.

It may have started out as a way to explain what people did not have the scientific knowledge to explain at one point in our history, but then it was learned by some that religion was useful in controlling the masses and bending them to their will for good or ill.

Perhaps for the less cerebral, you'd like to explain just what David's point was and of course in a non-interpretive manner, which leads one to this conclusion: Why do we need David, you will suffice.

It stands to reason that an all knowing eternal God could predict what you and I would believe no before He made and thus have already know whether we would except him or not And I'm not sure what you trying to say by that And because we want to tell others about Him and be used by Him to reach others And that commit does not make any sense, but clearly God is not a punk, as I have already demonstrated And your main point, as I already explained is false No, but my belief is true, none the less, it is by definition virtually impossible to prove anything And no, I don't need knee pads.

I think you're missing the point that Oprah tried to explain to Nyad what Nyad believes, without actually listening to what Nyad was saying.

At this point Matthew uses his rubric to introduce a quotation from the Old Testament, which he amplifies a bit by explaining what the name Emmanuel means (Matt.

It is this essentially sacramental character of the Scriptures — the special forms of the words and sentences which give them unique power to point beyond themselves to the sources of being from which untold possibilities spring — that explains what is meant by the statement that for the believer the Bible is the Word of God.

It is this proclamation which gives the meaning to the sacrament — here is the story which explains what is happening, here is the Word preached which gives point to the Word enacted.

Hartshorne sometimes explains this by reference to what Whitehead termed the fallacy of simple location (CAP 110, 187; CP 468; PS 10: 94; OP 301f), but he also illustrates the point through Charles Peirce's theory of categories (CAP 74 - 91, 103 - 113; CP 455 - 474; RNR 215 - 224).

Hellooooo, that's the point of science — to figure out what we can't explain.

To explain it is to show how the agent concretely experienced the situation rather than to show what, from a more objective vantage point, the situation actually was.