Not exact matches
It is true, of course, that
by appealing to the freedom of Satan and his
cohorts to
explain natural evil, Plantinga himself, has adopted a defensive, seemingly ad hoc manner of preserving the consistency of his position.
This is accomplished
by using only that portion of the achievement of a gender or racial group that can not be
explained by a linear time trend and the overall gender and racial composition of the group's
cohort.
«Overall, results from the analyses indicate that between approximately 24 per cent and 43 per cent of the variance in written composition was
explained by the three language convention measures and that spelling was the main predictor of written composition for each
cohort.
«I am confident that the partnership with CEG Digital will allow us to satisfy our strategic ambitions in this area
by facilitating the recruitment of new student
cohorts in a high quality, pedagogically robust manner,»
explained Professor Rebecca Lingwood, Vice-Principal (Student Experience, Teaching and Learning).
Unfortunately, the degree to which the report's findings can be
explained by these kinds of across -
cohort differences is not easy to assess.
Much of the variation would probably be
explained by changes in the prior achievement of the two
cohorts.
In 1965 Donald Judd published «Specific Objects,» an article that
explained «the new three - dimensional work» then being produced
by a
cohort of like - minded artists.1 Unlike conventional painting and sculpture, which Judd proclaimed to have served the purpose of a «container,» the new work was about the object itself.
Using a summary score of number of CD symptoms, structural equation modelling was used to investigate whether mean level and variation in CD increased with more recent
cohorts, and whether any increase in variance could be
explained by familial or non-familial factors.
The odds ratios estimated for
cohort and gender indicated that adjusting for the childhood measures marginally increased the observable differences, rather than
cohort and gender differences being
explained by the childhood measures (table 4).
A recent investigation from the UK Millennium
Cohort Study found that a variety of parenting, home learning, and early education factors
explained a small portion of the socioeconomic status (SES) gradients in children's cognitive ability
by age 5.2 Although some US studies have examined selected factors at different stages of childhood, 24 — 27 few have had comprehensive data to examine the socioeconomic distribution of a wide variety of risk and protective factors across early childhood and their role as potential independent mediators of the SES gradients in cognitive ability at kindergarten entry.
In the UK Millennium
Cohort study, parenting, home learning, and family interaction factors
explained 16 % to 17 % of the SES gradients in cognitive ability
by age 5 and preschool and early child care 2 % to 3 %.2 Perhaps owing to different or more comprehensive measures, health, home environment, and early education factors had a larger impact in ECLS - B.
A decomposition methodology examined the contribution from different sources in
explaining the SES gradient in early cognitive outcomes.34 Similar to the methodology used in the UK Millennium
Cohort Study, we focus on the quintile 1 — quintile 5 (Q1 — Q5) and quintile 1 — quintile 3 (Q1 — Q3) gaps and calculate the percentile points and the percentage of the raw gaps
explained by each candidate explanatory factor and each domain of factors.2 This was done
by taking the product of the mean gap in each explanatory factor (mean difference between Q1 — Q5 and Q1 — Q3)
by the β coefficients from linear regression models that predict reading and math ability from SES and all candidate explanatory factors.
In a birth
cohort study, risk of psychosis in adulthood was raised
by a factor of 4 if the mother, during pregnancy, reported that a baby was unwanted.49 Separation from parents in early life has been found to predict an increased risk of psychosis in genetically vulnerable children, 50,51 and the association between immigrant status and severe mental illness may be at least partially
explained by the high rates of early separation in migrant populations.52 Adolescents at high genetic risk of psychosis have also been found to be at increased risk of psychosis in later life if they report adverse relationships with their parents.53