Sentences with phrase «explained by physics»

The winning work is explained by physics Nobel Committee members Per Delsing and Olle Inganäs

Pull your head out and see the world for what it is: after the first Plank Second (1 x 10 -43 second) everything that has transpired is described / explained by physics and mathematics... no supernatural intervention required.

God can not be explained by physics.

Not exact matches

Doesn't a bright man like Steven know that there is no way that God can be explained by science or physics.

If I have had any success in communicating meaning to the reader by writing this book, are physics and chemistry capable of completely explaining this achievement?

If it is questionable whether mental activity such as the planning and writing of a book can be fully explained by the sciences of physics and chemistry, it may not be so doubtful that life is also resistant to exhaustive explanation in terms of atomic and molecular analysis.

I don't assume automatically that there must be a supernatural explanation for anything, only the things that can't be explained by the laws of physics as we currently understand them.

Scientific reductionism, however, wants to reduce biology to physics and chemistry, to explain the properties of «life», by thorough specification of the particulars (atoms and molecules) that are integrated into cells and organisms.

Explaining life solely in terms of physics and chemistry would be analogous to explaining how a town got built simply by demonstrating the crafts of making and layiExplaining life solely in terms of physics and chemistry would be analogous to explaining how a town got built simply by demonstrating the crafts of making and layiexplaining how a town got built simply by demonstrating the crafts of making and laying bricks.

Of course the biblical version of quantum mechanics and particles physics will be explained by our fundie friends, be patient.

Of course the biblical version of quantum mechanics and particle physics will be explained by our fundie friends, be patient.

In fact, physics now resembles metaphysics more than anything else, with its theories to explain how realities unobservable by us produce the visible world.

In physics, for example, the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle or principle of indeterminacy has been interpreted in three ways: 1) that the «laws of nature» are deterministic, and that any uncertainty is due to human ignorance, which in due time will be resolved by science (Einstein), 2) uncertainty can be always explained by present experimental limitations (Neils Bohr), and 3) indeterminacy is an objective characteristic of reality Werner Heisenberg).

The idea that physics by itself could predict, or even causally explain, all the movements of living human bodies is a pure pipedream.

After the first Planc Second of The Bang, everything can be described and explained by math, physics, checmistry, etc..

Recent attempts to explain away the fine - tuning of the universe's laws by hypothesising a «multiverse» of different universes do not convince Davies: «The multiverse theory is increasingly popular, but it doesn't so much explain the laws of physics as dodge the whole issue.

The example Barr considered was human consciousness, focusing on Roger Penrose's argument that the mind can not be explained by currently known laws of physics.

@ Bucky: I appreciate that God created intelectual people like you to explain all this quantum physics stuff to those of us who don't and probably could never attend Cal Tech (which is huge by the way, congrats on that).

The inescapable truth about the world is that there has NEVER been any proof of any event that couldn't be explained by the laws of nature (of physics).

The Big Bang Theory was as proven as something could get four years ago by the winner of the Nobel Prize in physics who discovered radiation in our universe on a scale and pattern that could only be explained by a gigantic explosion that created our universe 6 billion years ago.

PDX — It doesn't take a Genius to realize from my statements that i have read things other than the Bible you moron i have spent many hours reading and listening to scientists about their theories on the big bang, i have listened to ideas from the most revered scientists including Hawking and others, and they all admit that there are holes in their theories, that nothing fully explains their big bang theory, the physics doesn't add up let alone the concept, there are plenty of scientists hard at work trying to make the numbers fit and the theory hold weight but if you ask any of them they can not give you the answers and the reason being... there are none, the theory doesn't work, If by the observable laws of Physics, Matter in this Universe can not be created or destroyed, you can only change its state, i.e. solid to liquid, to gas... to energy... There is no explanation for how an entire reality full of Matter can be created out of nothing... Scientists know this... idiots that are atheists and simply would rather NOT believe that their lives and actions they take within their lifespan are being witnessed by an Omnipotent God do not WANT to believe... but Your belief in God does not change whether or not he exists you will be physics doesn't add up let alone the concept, there are plenty of scientists hard at work trying to make the numbers fit and the theory hold weight but if you ask any of them they can not give you the answers and the reason being... there are none, the theory doesn't work, If by the observable laws of Physics, Matter in this Universe can not be created or destroyed, you can only change its state, i.e. solid to liquid, to gas... to energy... There is no explanation for how an entire reality full of Matter can be created out of nothing... Scientists know this... idiots that are atheists and simply would rather NOT believe that their lives and actions they take within their lifespan are being witnessed by an Omnipotent God do not WANT to believe... but Your belief in God does not change whether or not he exists you will be Physics, Matter in this Universe can not be created or destroyed, you can only change its state, i.e. solid to liquid, to gas... to energy... There is no explanation for how an entire reality full of Matter can be created out of nothing... Scientists know this... idiots that are atheists and simply would rather NOT believe that their lives and actions they take within their lifespan are being witnessed by an Omnipotent God do not WANT to believe... but Your belief in God does not change whether or not he exists you will be judged.

To explain the second strategy, let us recall the display of the reductionist order of the sciences along the «Comtean ladder,» which arranges the forms of life and the corresponding specialized disciplines in an ascending series of rungs starting with physics at the base, followed by chemistry, biology, psychology, sociology and, depending on one's inclination, history and religion.

John Stewart Bell's math set a limit on how similar the behavior of particles could be in a universe explained only by traditional physics.

The existing theory of light as waves failed to explain the effect, but Einstein provided a neat solution by suggesting light came in discrete packages of energy called photons — a brain wave that won him the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1921.

It was first widely invoked by cosmologists in 1998 to explain why the expansion of the universe seems to be speeding up, a finding that won the Nobel Prize in Physics last year.

After years of searching, a tau neutrino has been found that switched from a different type — it can only be explained by new physics

«We hope that by applying our understanding of complex networks to one of the fundamental questions in physics we might be able to help explain how discrete quantum spaces emerge.

Currently ideas of gravity, developed by Einstein and Newton, explain how physics operates on a very large scale, but do not work at the sub-atomic level.

«It opens up some possibility that body size can be explained by basic principles of physics and chemistry.»

Bouquet, a student in the joint doctoral program between UTSA's Department of Physics and Astronomy and SwRI's Space Science and Engineering Division, explained that microbial communities sustained by H2 have been found in extreme environments on Earth.

Electrical phenomena are commonplace and unusual events that can be observed which illuminate the principles of the physics of electricity and are explained by them.

As Wetzel explained: «By improving how we modeled the physics of stars, this new simulation offered a clear theoretical demonstration that we can, indeed, understand the dwarf galaxies we've observed around the Milky Way.

All these materials fall under the heading of «quantum materials,» ceramics, layered composites and other materials whose electromagnetic behavior can not be explained by classical physics.

In 1900, he proposed the idea that energy comes in discrete chunks, or quanta, simply because the smooth delineations of classical physics could not explain the spectrum of energy re-radiated by an absorbing body.

Russian scientist Natalya Pugach from the Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics at the Lomonosov Moscow State University discovered this yet to be explained effect with her British colleagues, whose theory group headed by Professor Matthias Eschrig.

By September, Bohr and Wheeler had produced a thorough theoretical analysis, explaining the physics underlying the fission process and identifying which isotope of uranium fissioned most readily.

This quest for «new physics» could explain the disappearance of antimatter after the Big Bang and the nature of the dark matter that, although it represents around 30 % of the universe, can only be detected by astronomical measurements at this point.

«In high school, I had won the Bausch & Lomb science award, and I aspired to be a physics major in college,» Representative Lamar Smith (R - TX) explained to attendees at the annual Forum on Science and Technology sponsored by AAAS (publisher of ScienceInsider).

While the strong sigma or covalent bonds were explained by the new theories of quantum mechanics, hydrogen bonds were seen as nothing more than an electrostatic attraction between charged particles and were explained according the principles of classical physics.

Many of these can, of course, be explained by fairly elementary physics, but some can not.

One of the biggest surprises was that these states could often be explained by theories that had been invented to solve completely different problems, such as reconciling gravity with quantum physics.

For years, biologists have assumed that skin color is affected by something like the physics that explains why the sky is blue.

Lead researcher Dr David Clements, from the Department of Physics at Imperial College London, explains: «Although we're able to see individual galaxies that go further back in time, up to now, the most distant clusters found by astronomers date back to when the universe was 4.5 billion years old.

The relationship also works the other way: by changing energy states of electrons in quantum dots, we can affect the respective magnetic atoms,» explains Michał Papaj, a student at the UW Faculty of Physics, awarded the Gold Medal in Chemistry during last year's national competition for the best B.Sc.

Within a year a group led by Lawrence Rudnick of the University of Minnesota announced that the giant WMAP cold spot in the southern sky corresponds to just such a void, one that is far too large to be explained by conventional physics.

«The influence of laser light on the state of the atoms can be compared to the magnetization of solid crystals by an external magnetic field in classical physics,» Dr. Christian Groß, leader of the project, explains.

One day his physics teacher wrote an equation on the board that explained the relationship between distance traveled and time1 and then proved it by rolling a ball down an inclined plane.2 Dr. Gates realized that physics could deliver mathematics from the fantasy of his books, comics, and imagination into the real world.

«This theory could explain why continental interiors with huge rain forests remain so moist,» says Wildlife Conservation Society researcher Douglas Sheil, who in an April Bioscience paper revived the biotic pump model, originally proposed in 2006 by Anastassia Makarieva and Victor Gorshkov, both at the Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute in Russia.

Sangouard explains what happens next: «The single photon is not transmitted or reflected by the mirror; instead — quantum physics is strange — the photon is simultaneously transmitted and reflected.

In fact, in an assessment earlier this year, Cambridge researchers Professor Roger Pedersen and PhD student Victoria Mascetti concluded that the existence of naive human stem cells required confirmation by other stem cell research groups: «Like Higgs» Boson to the field of particle physics,» they explained, naivety in human stem cells «was predicted from considerations of symmetry and conservation, [but] we are yet to unlock its potential.»