Sentences with phrase «explained by the high court»

The High Court's approach also confines native title rights and interests to those that were exercised prior to the acquisition of sovereignty and requires that native title be understood as «a bundle of rights», as explained by the High Court in Miriuwung Gajerrong.

The purpose of this provision was explained by the High Court in Wilson v Anderson:

Not exact matches

He added that: «On the 8th of May, 2018, the Inspector General of Police sent a letter to the President of the Senate, Federal Republic of Nigeria signed by the Commissioner of Police, Legal and Prosecution Department, explaining why he would not be appearing before the Senate on the 9th of May, 2018 due to legal restraint as a result of pending cases before the courts filed: (i) by Senator Dino Melaye against the IGP and the Nigeria Police Force in the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja in suit No.

Again, no regard or consideration was given by the Respondents inspite of the pendency of the case in the High Court, Commercial Division and the Order for a valuation process to be undertaken by Ernst & Young to enable the Court proceed with the matter pending before it,» the suit explained.

He explained that the ruling by the High Court and the subsequent one by the Court of Appeal vindicates him.

«It is instructive to note that Lagos State was not a party in the case,» the director explained, reiterating that the Federal High Court never ordered the closure of Ikoyi Marriage Registry, as claimed by Olufuwa.

The Acting Chairman of the Commission, Hon. Abdullahi Bako, who made the presentation on behalf of the Commission explained that the amendment had become necessary given the fact that the Commission is restricted by its extant law to prosecute cases only in State High courts which has hampered its prosecutorial effectiveness because high profile defendants often wield substantial influence within a stHigh courts which has hampered its prosecutorial effectiveness because high profile defendants often wield substantial influence within a sthigh profile defendants often wield substantial influence within a state.

«The most outstanding discovery of our excavations is a high - quality mosaic floor in a splendid complex of buildings with a court enclosed by columns that originally covered more than 100 square metres,» explains archaeologist Dr. Michael Blömer.

The site, set up by the Solicitors» Association for Higher Court Advocates (SAHCA), explains that it aims to address the problem «frequently encountered by SAHCA's members, that when they receive instructions to attend a court outside of their region, or in a field in which they are not specialised, they have been forced to resort to instructing agents or members of the Bar&raCourt Advocates (SAHCA), explains that it aims to address the problem «frequently encountered by SAHCA's members, that when they receive instructions to attend a court outside of their region, or in a field in which they are not specialised, they have been forced to resort to instructing agents or members of the Bar&racourt outside of their region, or in a field in which they are not specialised, they have been forced to resort to instructing agents or members of the Bar».

To explain this, we can reverse the analogy of statutes such as the UK's European Communities Act 1972 acting as a «bridge» to activate the direct effect of EU law in the national order (as most recently reiterated by the High Court's decision in (R) Miller at paragraphs 37 - 54).

It introduces «unexplained wealth orders», which can be authorised by the High court and will force persons suspected of serious crime to explain where their wealth came from or risk having it seized.

By reference to cases including R (SB) v Governors of Denbigh High School [2006] UKHL 15, Miss Behavin» Ltd v Belfast City Council [2007] UKHL 19, R (Stevens) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2013] EWHC 792 (Admin) and R (Nagre) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWHC 720 (Admin), Hickinbottom J expressed the view that the differences between the approach required by ECHR jurisprudence and the traditional Wednesbury approach could be exaggerated and explained how a court should allow considerable deference to a decision, which on its face properly took into account the human rights engageBy reference to cases including R (SB) v Governors of Denbigh High School [2006] UKHL 15, Miss Behavin» Ltd v Belfast City Council [2007] UKHL 19, R (Stevens) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2013] EWHC 792 (Admin) and R (Nagre) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWHC 720 (Admin), Hickinbottom J expressed the view that the differences between the approach required by ECHR jurisprudence and the traditional Wednesbury approach could be exaggerated and explained how a court should allow considerable deference to a decision, which on its face properly took into account the human rights engageby ECHR jurisprudence and the traditional Wednesbury approach could be exaggerated and explained how a court should allow considerable deference to a decision, which on its face properly took into account the human rights engaged.

The question is: do the documents in dispute, ie, MSP and Pharmanet, come withing the terms of either Rule 7 - 1 (1)(a), ie, documents that can be used by a party of record to prove or disprove a material fact or that will be referred to at trial or, if not, do they come under category 7 - 1 (11), generally, in the vernacular, referred to as the Guano documents... There is no question that there is a higher duty on a party requesting documents under the second category... that in addition to requesting, they must explain and satisfy either the party being demanded or the court, if an order is sought, with an explanation «with reasonable specificity that indicates the reason why such additional documents or classes of documents should be disclosed», and again, there is no doubt that the new Rules have limited the obligation for production in the first instance to the first category that I have described and has reduced or lessened the obligation for production in general...

Led by Opticos Founding Principal Daniel Parolek, this session will explain, illustrate, and compare examples of high - quality, medium - density housing types such as duplexes, fourplexes, and bungalow courts called Missing Middle Housing.