Come on, why do put propaganda on the air like that, without a truthfully
explaining Gods word.
Not exact matches
The plainest reason why the Son of
God is called the
Word, seems to be, that as our
words explain our minds to others, so was the Son of
God sent in order to reveal his Father's mind to the world.
------ My Quote for you was the verse 2:214
explaining that we are passing a test of good and bad, what was our choice we will be rewarded for it... ------ my own
words are of my own Holy Book... and what I do is out of my Iman in the
words of this book and my Iman that by what am doing is «All in support of
God and his messengers» may I by that deserve the mercy of
God before death, after death and on resurrection, judgment date...!?
Second: The Creation tale is simply a way for early humans to
explain mans creation and «fall» from
God's predetermined path... The old testament is full of stuff more related to philosophy and health advice then «
Gods word» However, this revelation has not made me less of a christian... In Contrast to those stuck in «the old ways» regarding faith (not believing in neanderthals and championing the claim that earth is only 6000 years old), I believe
God created the universe on the very principle of physics and evolution (and other sciencey stuff)... Thus the first clash of atoms was the first step in the billionyear long recipe in creating the universe, the galaxies, the stars, the planets, life itself and us.
hi johnR — agreed in that I have no problem with letting love be love, I am not forcing the issue but rather have found the connection thru study and observation, I am using the
word god as a convention, finding
words... limited or clumsy... or my ability to use them problematic in
explaining so we use the
word god....
All of the other pages and articles will
explain how and by whom this world has been deceived as confirmed by the
Word of
God in Revelation 12:9.
Also, hearing or reading the
word of
God, the gospel, as
explained in the parable of the sower is not always successful.
• The always entertaining Forum Letter reports that in
explaining the first chapter of John's Gospel, the March - April - May issue of Augsburg Adult Bible Studies declares that «Jesus is simply «the
Word» who existed with
God and who is
God.
Jews can not help but recognize that Christians are inspired by the
God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, yet they can not
explain Christian belief in the divinity of Jesus, except to dismiss it as a «world - historical fiction» (in Franz Rosenzweig's
words).
Explaining how you re -
worded / re-worked the steps so you could follow them or how they helped get you through, sans
god... now that would have been helpful.
@Austin: «you can not use unbelieving logic to
explain how
God prophetically reveals His
word.
you can not use unbelieving logic to
explain how
God prophetically reveals His
word.
it reminds me the way Michael Frost (and many others in other
words, like NT Wright, Bonhoeffer, and even Ellul)
explain the kingdom of
God as being some kind of a «trailer» for the Kingdom that is coming, and christians would be already living the the Kingdom reality right here in this world, where it seems to the eye that there is no kingdom of
God at all.
Deductive reasoning used to
explain God's
Word.
All of the other pages and articles will
explain how mankind has been deceived by the spirit of this world as confirmed by the
Word of
God in Revelation 12:9 and they will also
explain what mankind must do to be reunited with
God and to be able to understand the Bible.
And finally its rather presumptuous to decide on who
God would let into Heaven and just the same I would not put
words in the mouth of a deity I might have
explain myself to later.
This means that when the church meets, the majority of the time in these meetings is spent in the
Word of
God,
explaining and applying it.
Where else do we get the opportunity to be fed with the
Word of
God,
explained to us by some one filled with the Holy Spirit at his ordination?
I don't like the
word sovereignty because it's the
word that Calvinists use to
explain why
God predestines people for hell.
I guess that if one starts with the premise that the Bible is the inerrant
word of
God, then not only does this notion of AS help
explain the Bible, it also validates it as well (huge eyeroll).
I agree that precept upon precept and line upon line is just what it means that
God wants us to teach and preach his
word just like that line upon line and precept upon precept
explaining what the scriptures means so that people can understand and giving them a little hear and there because you might give them more than they can comprehend.
He
explained: She gave
God's son a human nature; she gave the Eternal
Word —
God the Son, the second Person of the....
How can we possibly
explain something like that to people who base what they believe on logic and reason, rather than on faith and the
word of
God?
Until this happens it is worthier not to
explain the eclipse «in sensational and incompetent sayings, such as that of the «death» of
God, but to endure it as it is and at the same time to move existentially toward a new happening... in which the
word between heaven and earth will again be heard.»
I want to
explain how I've come to a place where I'm reluctant to use the
word «
God», or even express «belief» in this «
God».
But, if you are a student of the
Word of
God, and if you believe in the 100 % inerrancy of Scripture as I do, this still does not
explain Paul's misquotation.
In other
words, if there is no true will, we would have no way to
explain the origin of evil unless it were attributed to
God.
Faith is based on knowledge, and everything we need to know to be a victorious Christian is
explained in
God's
Word.
All of the other pages and articles listed on our website
explain how this whole world has been deceived as confirmed by the
Word of
God in Revelation 12:9.
Description # 2
explains the seemingly contradiction between killing and not killing in the
Word of
God.
Dave, someone
explained it to me this way: John says the
Word is
God.
I believe Paul is
explaining why he does not accept compensation for spreading
God's
word.
And
explained to him how he took
God's
word and made them his own, then taught others to do harm to people that don't believe in his
words and ruin their lives!
In his books, The Last
Word and Scripture and the Authority of
God, N. T. Wright uses an extremely helpful illustration for
explaining how
God's story functions, and where we fit into the plot.
except the Bible does not teach that
God came from nothing... you know nothing about the
Word of
God so don't
explain what you think It may or may not mean — you have no inclination whatsoever.
Not sure i am convinced because how do you
explain the verse an eye for an eye in the old testament there have always been consequences for wrong doing and stiill are for sin.If we believe the
word then that
word is from
God not satan.As far as satan is concerned he uses violence as his tools of trade he works on our fears and is limited to robbing stealing and destroying he does nt have anything else.Violence confirms to us that there is a spiritual battle going on both on the earthly plane and in the heavenlys and the battle is over souls.The verse the kingdon of heaven is expanding and violent people take it by force is referring to that spiritual battle and as satan uses violence to expand his dominion so does
God use violence to counter him.So what does he mean by that term for me i think it is saying that the the force of evil that satan uses or violence is overcome by a greater violence or force a more powerful one that being the Love of Christ.Through the cross we see that clearly portrayed and in our lives that very same battle is still happening right now for dominion be clear if we walk in the flkesh satan will have dominion over us but if we walk according to the spirit and abide in Christ we have freedom from our old nature.and satan.He can oppose us but he wont be able to influence us if we are in Christ.
Also, when you know more about religion, it just doesn't make any sense to attribute to a divine being what is clearly created by humans... just try
explaining to someone who believes the Bible is the literal
word of
god about the council of Nicaea.
To simply say that the Bible is the
word of
God, without
explaining that, is meaningless rhetoric.
I can never
explain how it feels to know that
God chose me to spread his
word through song and to tell the world that everythings not always pretty but with
God you can do anything and that he will never give up on you..
Furthermore, the bible also
explains that those who are true believers are those that hear
God's
word and obey it, thus living in perpetual sin does not show you are a true believer.
In my humble opinion, there's only one true representation of
God, and it is all
explained through his
word in the bible.
My point is that religions are for the most part fabrications of man to
explain the
word and will of
God...» Not sure what points you think are swaying in the wind but in any case, in this instance, you apparently missed my point entirely.
This may best be
explained in his own
words: «The true philosopher is the lover of
God.»
and in that way, it is not the
words of
God... rather, it is a number of dogs in the pack
explaining their experience with (and understanding of) sonic booms and explosion waves with dog comprehension and in dog terms, so that all we dogs can «pack up» and growl in the right direction... and stop whimpering in a corner overcome by fear.
This contrasts with philosophies that, justifying the existence of evil in
God's creation, would posit it as necessary for the machinery of the world — in other
words, with all forms of theodicy that merely
explain evil away.
My point is that religions are for the most part fabrications of man to
explain the
word and will of
God.
Jesus
explains in Luke 8:12 - 15 that when the
Word of
God is taught, there are four basic responses, represented by four soils.
He just wanted to simply
explain the
Word of
God simply.
I believe that
God exists and the bible is his
word because nothing else
explains the state the world we live in today.
A pastor's purpose is to point people to Jesus, and teach the
Word of
God, and
explain and apply the Scriptures.