The importance of additional school resources for student achievement has long been debated, with many researchers arguing that school resources do not matter much in
explaining differences in student achievement between schools, and therefore that money does not matter.
In one example presented in Instructional Rounds, four teachers were struggling to
explain the difference in student achievement in their various classes.
Not exact matches
Differences are unable to explain the much larger differences in student achievement between the United States and other
Differences are unable to
explain the much larger
differences in student achievement between the United States and other
differences in student achievement between the United States and other countries.
First, we use our entire sample to analyze the extent to which the schools that
students attend can
explain the overall variation
in student test scores and fluid cognitive skills, controlling for
differences in prior
achievement and
student demographic characteristics (including gender, age, race / ethnicity, and whether the
student is from a low - income family, is an English language learner, or is enrolled
in special education).
These findings also illustrate vividly the problem introduced by the Coleman analytical approach: finding that measured teacher
differences have limited ability to
explain variations
in student achievement is very different from concluding that schools and teachers can not powerfully affect
student outcomes.
We found that about half of the
difference in student outcomes
in schools slated for closure and the broader sample of schools can be
explained by
differences in incoming
students» demographic characteristics, absenteeism, and
achievement in middle school.
There's no reason to believe that the absence of high school sports
explains the
difference between
student achievement in the US and countries like Finland and South Korea.
The Education Next research article «Stuck
in the Middle,» featured
in the Fall 2010 issue of Education Next, finds that the steep drop - off
in middle - school
students» academic
achievement may be linked to the larger number of
students in each grade level but can not be
explained by
differences in per - pupil spending or class size, which were similar
in middle and K - 8 schools.
In 2012, one of my graduate students and I explored this question using data of 191 high schools in Connecticut and found that multiple linear regressions revealed that 69 % of the difference (variance) in a school's average student achievement can be explained by the percentage of students living in povert
In 2012, one of my graduate
students and I explored this question using data of 191 high schools
in Connecticut and found that multiple linear regressions revealed that 69 % of the difference (variance) in a school's average student achievement can be explained by the percentage of students living in povert
in Connecticut and found that multiple linear regressions revealed that 69 % of the
difference (variance)
in a school's average student achievement can be explained by the percentage of students living in povert
in a school's average
student achievement can be
explained by the percentage of
students living
in povert
in poverty.
Beginning with the now - famous evidence reported by Coleman and his colleagues (1966), study after study suggests that socioeconomic status (SES) of families
explains more than half of the
difference in student achievement across schools; it is also highly related to violence, dropping out of school, entry to postsecondary education and levels of both adult employment and income.
The paper suggests that international
differences in educational institutions
explain the large international
differences in student performance
in cognitive
achievement tests.
Achievement goal theory is one way to examine the motivational orientations of our students, and it can explain significant differences in students» patterns of learning and a
Achievement goal theory is one way to examine the motivational orientations of our
students, and it can
explain significant
differences in students» patterns of learning and
achievementachievement.