Sentences with phrase «explaining existence»

Publish a Privacy Act Notice in the Federal Register explaining the existence, character and uses of a new or revised SOR

The concept of a wrap - around story explaining the existence of the shorts is essentially abandoned here, allowing us to just enjoy some damn fine shorts that include magic, portals to other dimensions and a nightmarish trip into Mexico.

Can you explain to me why any one religion is the only true paradigm explaining existence.

And at the end of the day, MANY of the atheist arguments explaining existence CAN be deconstructed into a basic assertion of «ink + paper = dictionary».

@justageeker, «Not any harder to believe I am the only thing that exists than any other theory explaining existence.»

Please explain the existence of God.

How does an Atheist explain the existence and growth of a simple blade of grass?

So how do you explain the existence of all the people who not only doubt but outright state the opposite?

If all atheists are pro-choice, please explain the existence of groups like Godlessprolifers.org and prolifehumanists.org

Lastly, if evil didn't exist yet at that point, how does one explain the existence of the evil serpent and its evil intentions?

Still, Milosz sees all these lives under the sign that, for a Christian, ultimately explains existence: they all «Lie under crosses with their dates of birth and death.»

It was just primitive man's attempt to explain existence and to find comfort in the face of their mortality.

The book is really about the One God, the primordial necessity that explains our existence, reasoning, and loving.

Even if we were created by aliens it still doesn't explain the existence of the universe.

A metaphysical principle that would explain the existence of scientific law throughout the universe is that MIND controls and directs matter; matter can not control and direct itself «upward».

A metaphysical principle that would explain the existence of scientific law throughout the universe is a MIND which controls and directs matter; matter can not control and direct itself «upward».

If you argue that god simply exists, and was not created, then things can exist without being created and there is no need for god to explain the existence of the universe.

But that still begs the question of how you can explain the existence of an infinite causal chain.

The Free Will Defense is not a theodicy, and it is not an attempt to explain the existence of evil; it is a defense.

Oh by the way, which god neatly explains the existence of mankind and the universe?

Evolution does not explain existence, it merely explains morphology, and that it does with a great deal of holes.

«Without using current scientific theories (or past theories) how do you atheists explain our existence?»

All primitive cultures had their mythology, in an attempt to explain existence, give comfort to people and control the masses.

Without the spirit realm no one can even begin to explain the existence of ideas.

Most people recognize this, and so fall back on the second way to explain the existence of unregenerate elect Israelites.

Freedom offers Bergson the ground from which he can explain the existence of other realities and at the same time criticize the scientific theories of his day.

We can no more explain it than we can explain our existence itself.

Looking at these passages it is clear that the authors were investigating fundamental questions about the nature of reality, and seeking for ultimate principles that would explain its existence and nature.

I'm not trying to be hateful, nor am I asking a simple rhetorical question, but how do those who do not believe in God explain existence?

How do you explain his existence?

ALL religions are nothing but ancient mythology, written thousands of years ago by primitive people in order to try and explain existence, comfort people in the face of their mortality and keep people in line.

«the viewer wrote that one of her biggest fears was that her children and husband would not go to heaven «because they question why the Bible could not explain the existence of dinosaurs.»

Plantinga's famous «Free - Will Defense», Griffin points out, is by Plantinga's own admission not a theodicy — an attempt to explain the existence of evil — but rather simply a defense against the charge that «A good God exists» and «Evil exists» are logically incompatible.

In a submitted question, the viewer wrote that one of her biggest fears was that her children and husband would not go to heaven «because they question why the Bible could not explain the existence of dinosaurs.»

How do you think a person back then would explain the existence of salt pillars out in the wilderness?

Duke — please enlighten me, explain your existence?

Chuckles Duke Science has not explained our existence without the necessity of a superpower.

Both attempt to explain existence and the Universe and both fall short.

Of course, George Washington died about 200 years ago, before science had advanced to the point where we could explain our existence without a supreme being.

I continue to be amazed at the intricate theories man continues to develop to explain the existence of god (s)!

On the contrary, he finds it useful to ponder an array of reductionist attempts to explain the existence of religion, from that which seeks to pinpoint the area of the human brain or the specific genes connected to religiosity to that which sees religion as a malfunction of the human mind or a vestigial remnant from a primitive stage of human development suitable only for whimpering, immature dullards (a point of view championed by the new atheists).

I can explain the existence of these horrors as being due to natural causes, and evolution but my explanation fails when I include an all loving Creator in the equation.

religion is a lazy way to explain existence.

The first is purely negative: Neo-Darwinism is insufficient to explain the existence of certain observed features of organisms.

In one important way, Intelligent Design's argument is in a much weaker position than traditional cosmological arguments, for empirical results in biology could show that the mechanisms of neo-Darwinism are sufficient to explain the existence of complex biological forms, and in this case the motivation for Intelligent Design's theory would collapse.

Simply put: I believe that all theories attempting to explain our existence can not be proven or disproven in their entirety.

momoya, we don't need unicorns to explain our existence so why speculate?

Metaphysics at its best is scientific in the Quinean sense, because it posits things in order to explain the existence of observed phenomena.

The cult etiology explains the existence of a sanctuary or a cultic ritual.

Science can not explain the existence of the moral law within every person, which is the most convincing evidence for faith.