Consider these nine ways to teach with mistakes, including removing the stigma from error,
explaining wrong answers, and helping students see mistakes as growth experiences.
Not exact matches
In addition, quizzes that
explain the right vs.
wrong answers allow people to learn in a personalized, targeted way.
Ya, all the ideas are
wrong, what mister «pastor» says is right... The
answer is in the bible, but he never quotes texts
explaining why suffering.
If someone can not further
explain an
answer without being accused of attempting to change their «
wrong»
answer (in your view) without admitting mistake then I guess you hold people to an impossibly high standard and as you say «one that you can not keep yourself.»
Some honest Christians
answer these issues with statements like; I can't
explain why but it must be
wrong because it conflicts with the bible.
you just debate... right or
wrong doesn't matter to you, and you sarcastically
explain away
answers given.
If they make the
wrong decision,
explain why their
answer was incorrect, and why the other one was the best decision.
They consist of «stacks» of «cards» that review each chapter, with sets of multiple choice questions, and responses that
explain why
answers are either right or
wrong.
... I've done a bit of research and i think I may have found an
answer (i could be very
wrong, but, id like to share it anyway) heres my brief flow chart type of explanation: went from a high fat («anti-candida» diet) diet to a low fat diet (HCLF «raw till 4» but not strict) > restricted fats (under 5 % a day) > gallbladder isn't used enough > sluggish thick bile > then when i would eat fat it would
explain why i felt like crap and would get skin breakouts, constipation or candida would come back > cut out even more fat («banana island» diets for a few days, fat free etc) > over time my body stopped producing enough bile / stomach acid etc > due to sluggish bile therefore malabsorption of fats > fatty liver starts....?
Feedback provided for
wrong answers lets the learner know why the
answer was
wrong; while feedback for right
answers encourages learners and also
explains why the
answer was right.
One way to make TODs more rigorous is to give students problems with incorrect
answers and then ask them to
explain why they are
wrong.
Providing feedback to students,
explaining why their
answers were right or
wrong, and then allowing students to continue to work on a problem until they have it right and master the concept produces statistically significant gains in student learning.
In a recent Hartford Courant commentary piece entitled, «Smarter Balanced» Test
Wrong Answer For Students, Teachers, Connecticut Education Association President Sheila Cohen correctly
explains that,
And many of Mike's
answers... well... I'm trying SO HARD not to blow two hours of my day
explaining why he's just plain
wrong.
to
explain why skeptics are
wrong, and to
answer any and all questions.
We await to see if Gavin returns to
explain why his critics should not consider his
answer to willis point (b) either flat out
wrong or at best, highly misleading.
But, having said all that, I would like an
answer from those who believe that GHGs supply the surface with additional heat, to
explain why I am
wrong.
So either their
answer is right, and there is a strong compensating process which is not built into their models, or they are
wrong and they still need to
explain what keeps a positive feedback dominated process from running away.
Supervised learning means you can
explain the
answers you get, but with neural nets no - one can
explain why an
answer might be right or
wrong.
He had a great ability when making his submissions to
explain to the judge what the other side would say and why they were
wrong, so by the time his opponent started, the judge already knew the arguments and the
answers to them.
Career Coach, Corinne Mills,
explains where you may have been going
wrong when
answering «how are you?»