Sentences with phrase «explains issues in dispute»

Lawyer introduces parties, explains issues in dispute and agreements reached, as applicable, and presents lawyer's direction, lawyer's recommendations and counsellor's recommendations, as applicable.

Not exact matches

The findings explained a long - disputed issue in the previously held theory of why individual neurons seemed to recognize completely different people.

(1) Before executing a contract or agreement with or receiving money or other valuable consideration from a buyer, a credit services organization shall provide the buyer with a written statement containing: (a) A complete and detailed description of the services to be performed by the credit services organization for the buyer and the total cost of the services; (b) A statement explaining the buyer's right to proceed against the surety bond or surety account required by section 45 - 805; (c) The name and address of the surety company that issued the bond or the name and address of the depository and the trustee and the account number of the surety account; (d) A complete and accurate statement of the buyer's right to review any file on the buyer maintained by a consumer reporting agency as provided by the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. 1681 et seq.; (e) A statement that the buyer's file is available for review at no charge on request made to the consumer reporting agency within thirty days after the date of receipt of notice that credit has been denied and that the buyer's file is available for a minimal charge at any other time; (f) A complete and accurate statement of the buyer's right to dispute directly with the consumer reporting agency the completeness or accuracy of any item contained in a file on the buyer maintained by the consumer reporting agency; (g) A statement that accurate information can not be permanently removed from the files of a consumer reporting agency; (h) A complete and accurate statement of when consumer information becomes obsolete and of when consumer reporting agencies are prevented from issuing reports containing obsolete information; and (i) A complete and accurate statement of the availability of nonprofit credit counseling services.

The court continued, explaining that «a genuine issue of material fact exists where facts concerning an issue that would dispose of the litigation are in dispute or where the undisputed material facts are capable of supporting conflicting inferences on such an issue.»

His leadership, knowledge, experience and thorough analysis have been very effective in resolving construction disputes before litigation because of his ability to explain complex design and construction issues in a simple and clear manner.

Cost oil disputes, meanwhile, arise from legal issues pertaining to first production, where the scrutiny of exploration and development costs lead to arguments over the capacity or expertise of states to properly audit such statements, which explains why expert consultancy FTI opened in South Africa in April this year.

In this issue: E-disclosure, The basics of corporate insolvency explained (Part 2), Another option for dispute resolution in the UAE: the DIFC Courts, Dispute Resolution Breakfast SeminarIn this issue: E-disclosure, The basics of corporate insolvency explained (Part 2), Another option for dispute resolution in the UAE: the DIFC Courts, Dispute Resolution Breakfast Sedispute resolution in the UAE: the DIFC Courts, Dispute Resolution Breakfast Seminarin the UAE: the DIFC Courts, Dispute Resolution Breakfast SeDispute Resolution Breakfast Seminars.

In this article from the February 2015 issue of LAWPRO Magazine, Lisa Weinstein (VP, TitlePLUS) explains how to reduce the risk of a claim related to a trust vs. gift dispute.

A landlord, whose evidence is disputed by a tenant at the first hearing, can be called to give oral evidence in the hope of proving his case and perhaps ironing out any issues which are unclear or poorly explained in his written statement.

But where the dispute involves something in the nature of an intellectual exchange, with reasons and analysis advanced on either side, the judge must enter into the issues canvassed before him and explain why he prefers one case over the other.