Sentences with phrase «explanation for anything»

Make sure you understand all of terms of the loan you have applied for, and ask your lender for an explanation for anything that confuses or concerns you.

The word «narcissism» is becoming quite a household term these days and at times it can be used as an explanation for anything from selfishness...

Get the client on the phone and ask them to provide further background and explanation for anything that is inconsistent or that doesn't make sense.

First, your pets have never had an explanation for anything that happens to them and they are not expecting it or needing it now.

Basically there is no real plot here and little explanation for anything.

An explanation for anything, MMH.

Live4Him wants people to believe that a non-natural explanation is MORE plausable than a non-natural explanation for existence EVEN THOUGH a non-natural explanation has never, not once, EVER been the explanation for anything.

God is becoming less useful as an explanation for anything, it seems.

I don't assume automatically that there must be a supernatural explanation for anything, only the things that can't be explained by the laws of physics as we currently understand them.

He thinks everyone owes him an explanation for anything his damaged mind can't figure out.

In fact, it's the reason people invented gods in the first place, to assuage their fear of the unknown and give them a catch - all explanation for anything they are uncertain about.

Make sure you understand all of terms of the loan you have applied for, and ask your lender for an explanation for anything that confuses or concerns you.

Given this, and that the pattern has been for science to debunk religious explanations and never the other way around, why should I give religious explanations for anything any credence at all?

Not exact matches

After reviewing the paperwork, your mortgage lender may ask for additional supporting information, which may include written explanations for «large, atypical deposits» in your bank account or anything else.

We would have dropped our inquisitiveness and drive to probe deeper a long time ago, because anything too complex for the mind doesn't need further explanation — it is irreduciblly complex and explained by an elusive thing that we can never find, prove, or test.

Do you know the mathematical impossibility that even one of these could randomly come into existance?Let alone all of the building blocks required for just a single simple cell to come together to form any type of living thing?There sure should be some blobs of fossilized transitions if evolution could happen.You people are real smart why don't you quit bashing Christians and quit believing the garbage you have been fed, and look up the evidence put forth by the Creation Research people.They have in fact proven creation down to a cellular level.Unlike evolution scientists who have no answers, but cleverly devised fables.Evolution is not even a very good fairy tale.Even if I didn't believe in God, Evolution is such a fools explanation of the origin of man that it takes just that to even consider it true.I understand though that you athiests will believe anything that allows you to love your sin and hatred of the one true God.

Must be weird being so ignorant that anything you have no other explanation for, you plug in «oh Jebus done it».

Unable to deal with that you need some kind of explanation, so you've decided there is an all - powerful, all - knowing sentient being you call God who is responsible for, well, pretty much anything you can't explain with more verifiable causes.

Thus the traditional conception of deity, which we have received from our past, puts its main stress on divine absoluteness or aseity; on divine causative agency as the explanation of everything that occurs whether by direct divine willing or by indirect divine permission with respect to evil done in the world; on divine self - containedness and hence lack of necessary relationship with anything else; on divine impassability, which makes any suffering impossible for God; and on divine moral perfection, with the giving of laws in accordance with which everything should be ordered.

In the religion, SBNR, atheism case, there is objective evidence against religions and none for them, there is no objective evidence for anything supernatural, there is objective evidence for much that was explained supernaturally in the past, and there are highly plausible explanations for purely natural universe supported by objective evidence.

That is what is so frustrating when discussing this because what you should say right at the start is «I believe in a God who doesn't have to follow any rules or logic or reason, can't be disproved even if scientists had 100 % of the universal explanations for existence, and I will continue to believe regardless of what anyone or anything says».

If we seek an explanation of that motive's power we must start with the fact that when anything is sacrificed for, from a battle - flag to a boy, it gains sacredness.

You are judging, your opening line for example said... «It's not like atheists offer people anything» You gave no explanation as to what you meant by that, and you made a sweeping statement about all atheists.

I know crazy but its something to think about since there is no ultimate explanation as to why we even exist, even if you take science to its root there is no explanation for why anything actually exists at all, after all you can't get something from nothing so I had rather have something than nothing.

Nevertheless he does not get further, does not reach anything different, for if he discovers this, he has a different explanation for it.

As for the being which has an extreme sensibility for that color perception, it is questionable whether it would be open to any explanation at all, but rather, by reason of the poverty of its inclinations or out of fear of being disturbed in its pleasant feelings, it would have nothing to do with anything else.

No Christian ever said anything about «magic» that is your explanation for 1) something that you do not understand and 2) a children's story that you extrapolate to being the religion (a big miss - conception by many people).

The message he brought was a polite request from the Bishop not to publish anything more on the topic for the moment, and for the moment not to publish the Explanations either.

Look at Kim Kallstrom last year, signed him and he immediately gets injured, something I not right at this club, there is an explanation for the injuries, Wenger is just too stubborn to do anything about it or change anything.

There hasn't been any explanation as to what the money was for, apart from «advisory services», and it hasn't been recommended by all the board just Chips Keswick and Lord Harris, who appear to be good ol' boys on the gravy train, so I don't really see anything stopping him just taking money out.

As for Michail Antonio, a player I like enormously, although he hasn't really done anything much this season yet, I haven't yet heard his explanation for what went through his head.

No explanation whatsoever was given for anything.

«I can't see any obvious explanation for that preference in the structure of the plants or anything else,» Hunt says.

Well for the fashionistas who do not know anything about it, let me give you a short explanation.

Rarely does so much talking say so little: Even after 30 - plus minutes of shocking pronouncements and sweeping exposition, no explanation has been offered for why we should care about any of these characters or anything that happens to them.

The Haunting is a superior ghost story that still doesn't overcome the stumbling - block of the whole subgenre: if there's any chance for a rational explanation for weird events, anything non-supernatural is as least as credible as the supernatural conclusions everyone is so fast to embrace.

If there's anything that this game doesn't do well, it would be the weak explanation for how some of it's mechanics work.

Kevin Spacey makes the most of the Lex Luthor role, though Superman Returns doesn't really have him doing anything extraordinary — he's just doing what Luthor does best, with little explanation as to where his lust for power comes from.

The assumption that we'll go with anything they decide to dish up without need for explanation is downright insulting.

The chip's theft would be devastating to the nations of the world and upset the balance of power and / or would put Apple and Microsoft out of business; the explanation is tossed off quickly and is really not germane to this discussion, because mainly what the movie wants and needs are excuses for people to fight and wisecrack and drive stylish cars very quickly and blow things up and smash vehicles and destroy property and make some more jokes and maybe flirt a little and kill people without dwelling too long on the dead bodies and maybe quite possibly and casually kill innocent civilians but not acknowledge anything more than — wow!

We can't take anything for sure until these lacking statements are replaced with more clear words and explanations.

And it's as good an explanation for all this as anything else.

For the last decade or so, we have challenged statements like, «the kids are bad, it's a poor neighborhood, it's after lunch, they don't like math» — all explanations for poor student results that don't have anything to do with teacher practiFor the last decade or so, we have challenged statements like, «the kids are bad, it's a poor neighborhood, it's after lunch, they don't like math» — all explanations for poor student results that don't have anything to do with teacher practifor poor student results that don't have anything to do with teacher practice.

You clearly aren't as informed as you think you are because Apple's ebooks can't be used on anything but Apple's devices, and B&N has removed all options to download ebooks outside of Nook apps and devices, and then they suddenly drop support for platforms and countries with no notice or explanation, so that's a pretty good reason for someone not to want to buy ebooks from them.

Before you sign anything, ask for an explanation of any dollar amount, term or condition that you don't understand.

After reviewing the paperwork, your mortgage lender may ask for additional supporting information, which may include written explanations for «large, atypical deposits» in your bank account or anything else.

Following a strict code means that banks will reject a loan application for the explanations given but private lenders generally accept anything reasonable.

(I asked Vanguard for an explanation, but they don't seem to feel there's anything wrong.)

I'm not saying you can't go for something luxurious if you're blog is focusing on budget travel or that you won't know anything about traveling budget if you normally stay in 5 - star hotels, but it might need some explanation if you occasionally decide to write about «the other side».

I can't understand their explanation and won't be using Chase products for anything in the future.