Facebook is in the spotlight for allowing the British data firm to scrape millions of profiles without
the explicit consent of its users.
Not exact matches
And Google came under fire for an updated European
user consent policy that has open - ended language, which critics said violated a tenet
of European privacy rules that requires companies to ask for
user consent in specific and
explicit ways.
Wyden, one
of the loudest digital privacy champions in Congress, wants the public to use Facebook's Cambridge Analytica debacle to demand that social networks obtain «
explicit consent» from
users before sharing their personal data with anyone — including advertisers.
It also notes that Facebook collects
user data concerning sexual orientation, religious and political views «without the
explicit consent of account holders».
• post, link to or otherwise publish any
User Content which contains any confidential information
of or about a third party except with such third party's
explicit consent / authority;
Wyden, one
of the loudest digital privacy champions in Congress, wants the public to use Facebook's Cambridge Analytica debacle to demand that social networks obtain «
explicit consent» from
users before sharing their personal data with anyone — including advertisers.
The social network has found itself back under FTC investigation, after revelations that earlier versions
of its app policies allowed third - parties to extract the personal information
of millions
of users without their
explicit consent.
«If Facebook moves ahead (with its plans), I would be wary
of efforts that repurpose
user data without
explicit consent.»
He says that 270,000 people took the quiz but the data
of some 50 million
users, mainly in the US, was harvested without their
explicit consent via their friend networks.
Christopher Wylie, who worked with Cambridge Analytica, alleges that because 270,000 people took the quiz, the data
of some 50 million
users, mainly in the US, was harvested without their
explicit consent via their friend networks.
The first question specifically concerns Grindr's handling
of information as sensitive to its
user demographic as HIV status, and the second concerns the larger conversation regarding whether or not any
user data should be shared with third - party applications without
explicit and informed
user consent.
He claims that 270,000 people took the quiz, but the data
of some 50 million
users, mainly in the US, was harvested without their
explicit consent via their friend networks.
The regulation includes mandatory notification
of any data breaches within 72 hours, and a requirement that sites get
explicit consent from
users in order to collect data.
Facebook's privacy practices have come under fire after revelations that Cambridge Analytica got data on Facebook
users, including information on friends
of people who had downloaded a psychological quiz app, even though those friends hadn't given
explicit consent to sharing.
It has also been revealed that the firm accessed data
of a
user's friends as well, for which
explicit consent had not been given and was in violation
of Facebook's data policies for third - parties.
So perhaps it's worried it might risk losing this chunk
of elite business in the US if American Facebook
users have to give
explicit consent to their political leanings being fair game for ad targeting purposes.
He alleges that because 270,000 people took the quiz, the data
of some 50 million
users, mainly in the US, was harvested without their
explicit consent via their friend networks.
It also notes that Facebook collects
user data concerning sexual orientation, religious and political views «without the
explicit consent of account holders».
Tech companies sucking up large quantities
of data indiscriminately without
explicit user consent — especially in the intimate environment
of one's home — is one
of the primary fears
of privacy advocates skeptical smart speakers won't be abused.
Moreover, the company has changed its policies to prevent the widescale collection
of data without
explicit consent from
users and is investigating any further apps which may have behaved similarly.
The revelation came in the aftermath
of the Cambridge Analytica reports that revealed how Facebook app developers were able to gather data about Facebook
users without their
explicit consent.
Apple is essentially capitalising on the Cambridge Analytica scandal, in which Facebook allowed an app to collect data on millions
of Facebook
users without their
explicit consent.