Sentences with phrase «explicit user permission»
The FTC said Ali Moiz and Murtaza Hussain, proprietors of software company Vulcun, have agreed to requirements that include gaining explicit user permission before...
http://www.theregister.co.uk/ Not exact matches
It seemed to have been done without explicit consent, though Facebook says it collected such data only from Android users who specifically allowed it to do so — for instance, by agreeing to permissions when installing Facebook.
It seemed to have been done without explicit consent, though Facebook says it collected such data only from Android users who specifically allowed it to do so for instance, by agreeing to permissions when installing Facebook.
Under that agreement, Facebook is required to notify and get explicit permissions from users before data about them is shared beyond the privacy settings that they have established.
Of specific interest were the revelations that sensitive data of as many as 87 million Facebook users were harvested without explicit permission by a political consulting firm, Cambridge Analytica, which was connected to the Trump campaign.
This facility allows members to send private messages to other users without really revealing their details or seeing the details of another without explicit permission from both users.
The default setting of copyright law requires all of these actions to have explicit permission, granted in advance, whether you're an artist, teacher, scientist, librarian, policymaker, or just a regular user.
The new Kinect system will not upload or record conversations and any user data (facial expressions, photos, videos etc...) «will not leave your Xbox One without your explicit permission.»
The problem is that the honest user can not distinguish between pirated software and sloppily - distributed software, where the original author or the re-distributor has failed to include explicit permission to use.
You must not do the following things: post material that is copyrighted, unless you are the copyright owner or have the permission of the copyright owner to post it; post material that reveals trade secrets, unless you own them or have the permission of the owner; post material that infringes on any other intellectual property rights of others or on the privacy or publicity rights of others; post material that is obscene, profane, defamatory, threatening, harassing, abusive, hateful, or embarrassing to another user of our website or any other person or entity; post a sexually - explicit image; post advertisements or solicitations of business; post chain letters or pyramid schemes; or impersonate another person.
No User shall transmit User Content or otherwise conduct or participate in any activities on the Web Site which, in the opinion of DriveSafeToday.com, Inc.'s counsel, are prohibited by law in applicable jurisdictions, including, without limitation, material or activities which (1) infringe any patent, trademark, copyright, trade secret or other proprietary right of any party (the «Rights»), unless User is the owner of the rights or has the express written permission of the owner to post or transmit such material to the Web Site; (2) infringe on any other intellectual property rights of others or on the privacy or publicity rights of others; (3) is obscene, defamatory, threatening, harassing, abusive, hateful, embarrassing or otherwise objectionable to another User or any other person or entity; (4) is sexually - explicit; (5) is an advertisement or solicitation of business or advocates an unsolicited or unrelated position or opinion; (6) represents any form of «chain letters» or pyramid scheme; (7) impersonates another person or entity; (8) intentionally or unintentionally violates any applicable local, state, national or international law while using or accessing the Web Site or the Materials; or (9) contains a virus, trojan, back door, logic bomb or any other form of malicious code.
Under the agreement, Facebook was required to obtain explicit permission from users in order to share their information with third - parties.
Federal lawmakers are now calling for Mark Zuckerberg to personally testify before Congress after bombshell reports revealed late last week that the shadowy political consultancy Cambridge Analytica acquired personal information on as many as 50 million Facebook users, many without their explicit permission.
(She couldn't see my identity, courtesy of anonymous sharing, which displays the names of users without explicit permissions as anonymous animals.)
Facebook has found itself under a new investigation by the US Federal Trade Commission, after it was revealed that previous versions of its developer tools allowed third - party apps to extract personal information on users who hadn't given explicit permission for that to take place.
Under that agreement, Facebook is required to notify and get explicit permissions from users before data about them is shared beyond the privacy settings that they have established.
A Facebook spokesperson also said that when the app is installed, a user generally given explicit permission to upload contacts, and that users can also delete the data from their profiles.
A brand new malware strain was just discovered, a sneaky attacks that fooled not only Apple's app review team into allowing malware apps into the App Store, but that can also quietly install apps on any iOS device without the user's explicit knowledge or permission.
However, this explicit permission feature on Android is still new, unlike iOS where users have always had the option of restricting access to some features for apps.
service wants to make a secondary use of the data, it must obtain explicit permission from the user.
When a service wants to make a secondary use of the data, it must obtain explicit permission from the user.
The FTC agreed in November 2011, faulting Facebook for making some information, such as users» friends lists, viewable by the public without first obtaining those users» explicit permission.
It seemed to have been done without explicit consent, though Facebook says it collected such data only from Android users who specifically allowed it to do so - for instance, by agreeing to permissions when installing Facebook.
Specifically, the investigation seeks to find whether Facebook violated a consent decree — which requires the social network to obtain explicit permission from users to share their data with third parties — that it signed with the agency in 2011.