Sentences with phrase «express order of the court»

(iii) The taking of samples from children should only be undertaken pursuant to the express order of the court.

Not exact matches

As written by the Express, the west London side insist that Costa is still their player and must return to the English capital in order to full - fill his contractual obligations, which the player claims went out the window after boss Conte told him that he was not part of the Italians plans for this season, with the two's battle set to be continued in High Court if peace can not be agreed between the two.
I share the view expressed by objective and reasonable members of the public that because the government was the 1st defendant / respondent against whom the Supreme Court made declarations of unconstitutional conduct in paying the judgment debt to Alfred Agbesi Woyome, the government has been pretending for purely political reasons at each turn to take steps to enforce the judgment and orders of the court only to deliberately abort Court made declarations of unconstitutional conduct in paying the judgment debt to Alfred Agbesi Woyome, the government has been pretending for purely political reasons at each turn to take steps to enforce the judgment and orders of the court only to deliberately abort court only to deliberately abort them.
Members of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) in Osun, on Wednesday expressed satisfaction over an order by the Federal High Court in Osogbo, that restricted the...
Abonta expressed concern that, it would spell doom for Nigerian democracy and it would also give room to anarchy, if «an agency of the Federal Government (police) continues to disobey orders of the court
Quoting Ecclesiastes that «better is the end of a thing than the beginning thereof,» Judge Elliott, 84 years old at the time, expressed his hope to end court - ordered desegregation in the district before he died.
Holding that state enterprise Indian Rail Tour Catering and Tourism Corporation (IRCTC) is the «absolute owner» of luxury tourist train Maharaja Express, Delhi High Court bench comprising of acting Chief Justice A K Sikri and Justice Siddharth Mridul set aside its interim order to IRCTC to run this service jointly with Cox & Kings.
Australia celebrates while Japan expresses disappointment over International Court of Justice order to halt whaling.
At least the court revised the insurer's proposed terms to circumscribe the obligation in these terms: «The defence insurer shall be entitled to require the claimant to undergo medical examination at its request upon reasonable notice being given to the claimant at any time during the claimant's lifetime, such medical examinations to be limited to obtaining a medical opinion as to the claimant's general health in order to obtain a quotation for the purchase cost of an annuity to fund the periodical payments and / or (not more frequently than once every seven years) for the express purposes of reviewing its reserve.
The Court of Appeal expressed concern, however, with the requirement in the order that all contact be through one counsel with no alternative arrangements in place, and with the absence of any provision addressing the course of action in the event that the Appellant be required by summons or other court process to attend a courthouse or regiCourt of Appeal expressed concern, however, with the requirement in the order that all contact be through one counsel with no alternative arrangements in place, and with the absence of any provision addressing the course of action in the event that the Appellant be required by summons or other court process to attend a courthouse or regicourt process to attend a courthouse or registry.
The first task is for the court to identify by reference to the express language of the order specifically what it is that the defendant is required to do;
In three separate Court decisions delivered recently, the state supreme court strengthened the jurisprudence regarding both expressed consent as well as the ability for law enforcement to take blood in order to perform alcohol testing on drivers suspected of driving under the influCourt decisions delivered recently, the state supreme court strengthened the jurisprudence regarding both expressed consent as well as the ability for law enforcement to take blood in order to perform alcohol testing on drivers suspected of driving under the influcourt strengthened the jurisprudence regarding both expressed consent as well as the ability for law enforcement to take blood in order to perform alcohol testing on drivers suspected of driving under the influence.
District Court amended its original claim construction order based on the PTAB's ruling and granted summary judgment of non-infringement in favor of Ford on the ground that the express disclaimer prevented the patent - in - suit from covering Ford's vehicles.
And he issued an order that took the city to task, expressing regret for canceling the trial, stating that the court «can not rely on the City of Austin to support the recommendations of its lawyers.»
For the Court, it would be an exceptional order to deny the successful party its costs — against the express language of Rule 23 of the Court of Appeal Act.
The statute is very specific as to what notice must be provided to the non-relocating parent and the possible consequences if the relocating parent moves with the child or children without getting the required statutory notice and the express written approval of the other parent or a court order allowing said relocation.
He said this motion was merely to carry out the idea which he had expressed the other night — that he believed under the peculiar circumstances in whihc the Province of Quebec was situated, and its special system of laws, of which the Judges from the other Provinces who might be selected for this court would be entirely ignorant — it was essential in order to arrive at a good and sound interpretation of the laws of that Province, that two of these Judges, at least, should be selected from the bar of Lower Canada... [C] onsequently he believed and in fact was perfectly satisfied that no member in this House, and no man in the country, would doubt it, that Judges selected from the bar of the Province of Québec would be as comptent to administer justice as those selected from the bar of any other Province.
Hale LJ dissented and expressed concern regarding a general enforceability of pre-nuptial agreements and that the law should «not introduce a presumption or starting point in favour of holding the parties to it: the guiding principle should be fairness in the light of the actual and foreseeable circumstances at the time when the court comes to make its order» and stated that «modern marriage still possesses an irreducible minimum, which includes a couple's mutual duty to support one another and their children».
Rose v. Lynx Express Limited Ref: [2004] 1 BCLC 455 (Court of Appeal) Acted for the successful appellant on an appeal concerning the appropriate test for a Court to order pre-action disclosure.
has no other specific legal remedy, this court ought to assist by mandamus, upon reasons of justice, as the writ expresses, and upon reasons of public policy, to preserve peace, order and good government.»
Also worth noting is that the Alabama inmate's appeals to the Supreme Court generated some comments from some Justices detailed in this order: Justice Breyer issued a short statement respecting the denial of a stay which spoke to the defendant's lengthy time on death row; Justice Ginsburg issued a dissent, which Justice Sotomayor joined, expressing concerns «about how Hamm's execution would be carried out.»
In cases where confidentiality of sensitive information is a concern, erring on the side of caution is important since, unlike superior courts, which can prevent misuse of confidential information through court order, professional regulatory bodies have no express power to control what complainants do with information once in their possession.
The Court of Appeal's decision reconfirms that in order for an oral promise to constitute an express term of the employment contract, the term must be sufficiently certain, based on what the parties have objectively communicated.
But essentially, while express trusts are those which come into existence because settlors have expressed their intention to that effect, constructive trusts arise not because of anyone's expression of trust intent but because B ought to surrender property to A and this is the machinery the court employs in order to get B to do that.
Today, the Supreme Court held that it violated the Sixth Amendment for McCoy's lawyer to admit his guilt over his express objection, and it ordered the state of Louisiana to grant McCoy a new trial.
Courts have expressed caution about the release of litigation documents in audio or video form, which are which are «subject to a higher degree of potential abuse» than written transcripts,» the order states.
After setting out the principles of punitive damages, the judge stated that «some measure of punitive damages is warranted in order to express the court's disapproval, to set a public example, and to deter the kind of conduct evidenced here».
On December 9, 2014, the Ontario Court of Appeal decided that the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) prevents a mortgagee from disclosing the mortgagor's discharge statement to another lender — even when that lender has a judgement against the mortgagor — without either the mortgagor's express consent or a specific court oCourt of Appeal decided that the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) prevents a mortgagee from disclosing the mortgagor's discharge statement to another lender — even when that lender has a judgement against the mortgagor — without either the mortgagor's express consent or a specific court ocourt order.
The second is that where the court makes an express order requiring the parent with care to comply with contact arrangements, and that order is breached, then, in the interests of consistency, the judge must support the order by considering enforcement, either under the enforcement provisions in section 11J of the 1989 Child Act or by contempt proceedings.
Disclosure is permissible in very limited cases including: (i) the written consent of the client or the written consent of the rightful owner of the confidential information is obtained; (ii) an express court judgement ordered such disclosure is obtained and only to the extent needed by the court; or (iii) if the attorney, his partners or employees are accused of a criminal charge or a civil claim arising from the relationship with the client or a negligence or professional misconduct.
By analogy, when a state legislature fails to adopt a redistricting plan that complies with the constitution, which is normally a political question, this failure to act allows a federal court to craft a redistricting plan as a remedy for the failure of the legislature to act, in order to protect the constitutional rights of voters and candidates in future elections, even though no express language of the constitution or statute addresses the remedy when a state legislature fails to pass a redistricting plan.
In Mortgage Express v Sawali, in Birmingham High Court on this week, Judge Simon Brown QC ordered the files to be delivered up to the lender so that they could see whether the advance was part of a sub-sale or back - to - back transaction.
The Committee expresses concern at the all - inclusive category of «other conduct that disrupts court order» in various articles of the Law on Lawyers, the Criminal Procedure Law and in the newly amended article 309 of the Criminal Law, which in its view is overbroad, undermines the principle of legal certainty and is open to abusive interpretation and application.»
A method of commencing proceedings whereby the order required by the petitioner from the Court is expressed as a prayer, e.g. the petitioner therefore prays that the marriage be dissolved (divorce proceedings)
Ticket Payments The City of Houston Municipal Courts accepts payments in cash, check, money order, ATM debit card, and credit card (American Express, Visa, MasterCard and Discover).
a.In ordering shared parental responsibility, the court may consider the expressed desires of the parents and may grant to one party the ultimate responsibility over specific aspects of the child's welfare or may divide those responsibilities between the parties based on the best interests of the child.
In ordering shared parental responsibility, the court may consider the expressed desires of the parents and may grant to one party the ultimate responsibility over specific aspects of the child's welfare or may divide those responsibilities between the parties based on the best interests of the child.
(8) A court that has sentenced a person to imprisonment for a period expressed as provided by paragraph (1)(b) may order the release of the person if it is satisfied that the person will, if he or she is released, comply with the order concerned.
Would the terms of such an agreement be capable of being expressed with the level of specificity required to constitute a court order, particularly given the breadth and complexity of the matters of agreement that could be covered?
Would the terms of such an agreement be capable of being expressed with the level of specificity required to constitute a Court order, particularly given the breadth and complexity of the matters of agreement that could be covered?
As expressed by the trial judge near the end of his comprehensive reasons: «Both the father and the two oldest children actively participated in the disobedience of the court order placing the third child in foster care during the investigation of very serious protection concerns.
The unfortunate history here also reflects the plaintiff's hiring and firing of three different counsel, expressed disdain towards the children's attorney, and utter disregard for the authority of the Court... [A] fter careful consideration of the circumstances of the nature and extent of the multiple instances of violation of the court order, the plaintiff is sentenced to a period of incarceration for six weekends, to be served on the first and third weekends of each month for the months of June, July and August, Court... [A] fter careful consideration of the circumstances of the nature and extent of the multiple instances of violation of the court order, the plaintiff is sentenced to a period of incarceration for six weekends, to be served on the first and third weekends of each month for the months of June, July and August, court order, the plaintiff is sentenced to a period of incarceration for six weekends, to be served on the first and third weekends of each month for the months of June, July and August, 2010.
In Delgamuukw v British Columbia, the Supreme Court of Canada ordered a new trial on the basis that «the trial judge expected too much of the oral history of the appellants, as expressed in the recollections of Aboriginal life of members of the appellants».
A court may order supervision or a neutral place of exchange if concerns are expressed about safety.
(6) An order decreasing the amount of a periodic sum payable under an order or discharging an order may be expressed to be retrospective to such date as the court considers appropriate.
(6A) Where, as provided by subsection (6), an order decreasing the amount of a periodic sum payable under an order is expressed to be retrospective to a specified date, any moneys paid under the second ‑ mentioned order since the specified date, being moneys that would not have been required to be paid under the second ‑ mentioned order as varied by the first ‑ mentioned order, may be recovered in a court having jurisdiction under this Act.
The court explained that in order for the Brokerage to keep a commission from this transaction, Fogleman would need to have informed the Seller of his involvement in SCP, the ultimate purchaser, and get the Seller's express permission to continue.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z