(iii) The taking of samples from children should only be undertaken pursuant to
the express order of the court.
Not exact matches
As written by the
Express, the west London side insist that Costa is still their player and must return to the English capital in
order to full - fill his contractual obligations, which the player claims went out the window after boss Conte told him that he was not part
of the Italians plans for this season, with the two's battle set to be continued in High
Court if peace can not be agreed between the two.
I share the view
expressed by objective and reasonable members
of the public that because the government was the 1st defendant / respondent against whom the Supreme
Court made declarations of unconstitutional conduct in paying the judgment debt to Alfred Agbesi Woyome, the government has been pretending for purely political reasons at each turn to take steps to enforce the judgment and orders of the court only to deliberately abort
Court made declarations
of unconstitutional conduct in paying the judgment debt to Alfred Agbesi Woyome, the government has been pretending for purely political reasons at each turn to take steps to enforce the judgment and
orders of the
court only to deliberately abort
court only to deliberately abort them.
Members
of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) in Osun, on Wednesday
expressed satisfaction over an
order by the Federal High
Court in Osogbo, that restricted the...
Abonta
expressed concern that, it would spell doom for Nigerian democracy and it would also give room to anarchy, if «an agency
of the Federal Government (police) continues to disobey
orders of the
court.»
Quoting Ecclesiastes that «better is the end
of a thing than the beginning thereof,» Judge Elliott, 84 years old at the time,
expressed his hope to end
court -
ordered desegregation in the district before he died.
Holding that state enterprise Indian Rail Tour Catering and Tourism Corporation (IRCTC) is the «absolute owner»
of luxury tourist train Maharaja
Express, Delhi High
Court bench comprising
of acting Chief Justice A K Sikri and Justice Siddharth Mridul set aside its interim
order to IRCTC to run this service jointly with Cox & Kings.
Australia celebrates while Japan
expresses disappointment over International
Court of Justice
order to halt whaling.
At least the
court revised the insurer's proposed terms to circumscribe the obligation in these terms: «The defence insurer shall be entitled to require the claimant to undergo medical examination at its request upon reasonable notice being given to the claimant at any time during the claimant's lifetime, such medical examinations to be limited to obtaining a medical opinion as to the claimant's general health in
order to obtain a quotation for the purchase cost
of an annuity to fund the periodical payments and / or (not more frequently than once every seven years) for the
express purposes
of reviewing its reserve.
The
Court of Appeal expressed concern, however, with the requirement in the order that all contact be through one counsel with no alternative arrangements in place, and with the absence of any provision addressing the course of action in the event that the Appellant be required by summons or other court process to attend a courthouse or regi
Court of Appeal
expressed concern, however, with the requirement in the
order that all contact be through one counsel with no alternative arrangements in place, and with the absence
of any provision addressing the course
of action in the event that the Appellant be required by summons or other
court process to attend a courthouse or regi
court process to attend a courthouse or registry.
The first task is for the
court to identify by reference to the
express language
of the
order specifically what it is that the defendant is required to do;
In three separate
Court decisions delivered recently, the state supreme court strengthened the jurisprudence regarding both expressed consent as well as the ability for law enforcement to take blood in order to perform alcohol testing on drivers suspected of driving under the influ
Court decisions delivered recently, the state supreme
court strengthened the jurisprudence regarding both expressed consent as well as the ability for law enforcement to take blood in order to perform alcohol testing on drivers suspected of driving under the influ
court strengthened the jurisprudence regarding both
expressed consent as well as the ability for law enforcement to take blood in
order to perform alcohol testing on drivers suspected
of driving under the influence.
District
Court amended its original claim construction
order based on the PTAB's ruling and granted summary judgment
of non-infringement in favor
of Ford on the ground that the
express disclaimer prevented the patent - in - suit from covering Ford's vehicles.
And he issued an
order that took the city to task,
expressing regret for canceling the trial, stating that the
court «can not rely on the City
of Austin to support the recommendations
of its lawyers.»
For the
Court, it would be an exceptional
order to deny the successful party its costs — against the
express language
of Rule 23
of the
Court of Appeal Act.
The statute is very specific as to what notice must be provided to the non-relocating parent and the possible consequences if the relocating parent moves with the child or children without getting the required statutory notice and the
express written approval
of the other parent or a
court order allowing said relocation.
He said this motion was merely to carry out the idea which he had
expressed the other night — that he believed under the peculiar circumstances in whihc the Province
of Quebec was situated, and its special system
of laws,
of which the Judges from the other Provinces who might be selected for this
court would be entirely ignorant — it was essential in
order to arrive at a good and sound interpretation
of the laws
of that Province, that two
of these Judges, at least, should be selected from the bar
of Lower Canada... [C] onsequently he believed and in fact was perfectly satisfied that no member in this House, and no man in the country, would doubt it, that Judges selected from the bar
of the Province
of Québec would be as comptent to administer justice as those selected from the bar
of any other Province.
Hale LJ dissented and
expressed concern regarding a general enforceability
of pre-nuptial agreements and that the law should «not introduce a presumption or starting point in favour
of holding the parties to it: the guiding principle should be fairness in the light
of the actual and foreseeable circumstances at the time when the
court comes to make its
order» and stated that «modern marriage still possesses an irreducible minimum, which includes a couple's mutual duty to support one another and their children».
Rose v. Lynx
Express Limited Ref: [2004] 1 BCLC 455 (
Court of Appeal) Acted for the successful appellant on an appeal concerning the appropriate test for a
Court to
order pre-action disclosure.
has no other specific legal remedy, this
court ought to assist by mandamus, upon reasons
of justice, as the writ
expresses, and upon reasons
of public policy, to preserve peace,
order and good government.»
Also worth noting is that the Alabama inmate's appeals to the Supreme
Court generated some comments from some Justices detailed in this
order: Justice Breyer issued a short statement respecting the denial
of a stay which spoke to the defendant's lengthy time on death row; Justice Ginsburg issued a dissent, which Justice Sotomayor joined,
expressing concerns «about how Hamm's execution would be carried out.»
In cases where confidentiality
of sensitive information is a concern, erring on the side
of caution is important since, unlike superior
courts, which can prevent misuse
of confidential information through
court order, professional regulatory bodies have no
express power to control what complainants do with information once in their possession.
The
Court of Appeal's decision reconfirms that in
order for an oral promise to constitute an
express term
of the employment contract, the term must be sufficiently certain, based on what the parties have objectively communicated.
But essentially, while
express trusts are those which come into existence because settlors have
expressed their intention to that effect, constructive trusts arise not because
of anyone's expression
of trust intent but because B ought to surrender property to A and this is the machinery the
court employs in
order to get B to do that.
Today, the Supreme
Court held that it violated the Sixth Amendment for McCoy's lawyer to admit his guilt over his
express objection, and it
ordered the state
of Louisiana to grant McCoy a new trial.
Courts have
expressed caution about the release
of litigation documents in audio or video form, which are which are «subject to a higher degree
of potential abuse» than written transcripts,» the
order states.
After setting out the principles
of punitive damages, the judge stated that «some measure
of punitive damages is warranted in
order to
express the
court's disapproval, to set a public example, and to deter the kind
of conduct evidenced here».
On December 9, 2014, the Ontario
Court of Appeal decided that the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) prevents a mortgagee from disclosing the mortgagor's discharge statement to another lender — even when that lender has a judgement against the mortgagor — without either the mortgagor's express consent or a specific court o
Court of Appeal decided that the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) prevents a mortgagee from disclosing the mortgagor's discharge statement to another lender — even when that lender has a judgement against the mortgagor — without either the mortgagor's
express consent or a specific
court o
court order.
The second is that where the
court makes an
express order requiring the parent with care to comply with contact arrangements, and that
order is breached, then, in the interests
of consistency, the judge must support the
order by considering enforcement, either under the enforcement provisions in section 11J
of the 1989 Child Act or by contempt proceedings.
Disclosure is permissible in very limited cases including: (i) the written consent
of the client or the written consent
of the rightful owner
of the confidential information is obtained; (ii) an
express court judgement
ordered such disclosure is obtained and only to the extent needed by the
court; or (iii) if the attorney, his partners or employees are accused
of a criminal charge or a civil claim arising from the relationship with the client or a negligence or professional misconduct.
By analogy, when a state legislature fails to adopt a redistricting plan that complies with the constitution, which is normally a political question, this failure to act allows a federal
court to craft a redistricting plan as a remedy for the failure
of the legislature to act, in
order to protect the constitutional rights
of voters and candidates in future elections, even though no
express language
of the constitution or statute addresses the remedy when a state legislature fails to pass a redistricting plan.
In Mortgage
Express v Sawali, in Birmingham High
Court on this week, Judge Simon Brown QC
ordered the files to be delivered up to the lender so that they could see whether the advance was part
of a sub-sale or back - to - back transaction.
The Committee
expresses concern at the all - inclusive category
of «other conduct that disrupts
court order» in various articles
of the Law on Lawyers, the Criminal Procedure Law and in the newly amended article 309
of the Criminal Law, which in its view is overbroad, undermines the principle
of legal certainty and is open to abusive interpretation and application.»
A method
of commencing proceedings whereby the
order required by the petitioner from the
Court is
expressed as a prayer, e.g. the petitioner therefore prays that the marriage be dissolved (divorce proceedings)
Ticket Payments The City
of Houston Municipal
Courts accepts payments in cash, check, money
order, ATM debit card, and credit card (American
Express, Visa, MasterCard and Discover).
a.In
ordering shared parental responsibility, the
court may consider the
expressed desires
of the parents and may grant to one party the ultimate responsibility over specific aspects
of the child's welfare or may divide those responsibilities between the parties based on the best interests
of the child.
In
ordering shared parental responsibility, the
court may consider the
expressed desires
of the parents and may grant to one party the ultimate responsibility over specific aspects
of the child's welfare or may divide those responsibilities between the parties based on the best interests
of the child.
(8) A
court that has sentenced a person to imprisonment for a period
expressed as provided by paragraph (1)(b) may
order the release
of the person if it is satisfied that the person will, if he or she is released, comply with the
order concerned.
Would the terms
of such an agreement be capable
of being
expressed with the level
of specificity required to constitute a
court order, particularly given the breadth and complexity
of the matters
of agreement that could be covered?
Would the terms
of such an agreement be capable
of being
expressed with the level
of specificity required to constitute a
Court order, particularly given the breadth and complexity
of the matters
of agreement that could be covered?
As
expressed by the trial judge near the end
of his comprehensive reasons: «Both the father and the two oldest children actively participated in the disobedience
of the
court order placing the third child in foster care during the investigation
of very serious protection concerns.
The unfortunate history here also reflects the plaintiff's hiring and firing
of three different counsel,
expressed disdain towards the children's attorney, and utter disregard for the authority
of the
Court... [A] fter careful consideration of the circumstances of the nature and extent of the multiple instances of violation of the court order, the plaintiff is sentenced to a period of incarceration for six weekends, to be served on the first and third weekends of each month for the months of June, July and August,
Court... [A] fter careful consideration
of the circumstances
of the nature and extent
of the multiple instances
of violation
of the
court order, the plaintiff is sentenced to a period of incarceration for six weekends, to be served on the first and third weekends of each month for the months of June, July and August,
court order, the plaintiff is sentenced to a period
of incarceration for six weekends, to be served on the first and third weekends
of each month for the months
of June, July and August, 2010.
In Delgamuukw v British Columbia, the Supreme
Court of Canada
ordered a new trial on the basis that «the trial judge expected too much
of the oral history
of the appellants, as
expressed in the recollections
of Aboriginal life
of members
of the appellants».
A
court may
order supervision or a neutral place
of exchange if concerns are
expressed about safety.
(6) An
order decreasing the amount
of a periodic sum payable under an
order or discharging an
order may be
expressed to be retrospective to such date as the
court considers appropriate.
(6A) Where, as provided by subsection (6), an
order decreasing the amount
of a periodic sum payable under an
order is
expressed to be retrospective to a specified date, any moneys paid under the second ‑ mentioned
order since the specified date, being moneys that would not have been required to be paid under the second ‑ mentioned
order as varied by the first ‑ mentioned
order, may be recovered in a
court having jurisdiction under this Act.
The
court explained that in
order for the Brokerage to keep a commission from this transaction, Fogleman would need to have informed the Seller
of his involvement in SCP, the ultimate purchaser, and get the Seller's
express permission to continue.