, human beings have specific features, capacities, powers, limits, and tendencies, and human nature is defined by these as
expressed by human beings taken as a whole.
It is a picture of what love looks like when perfectly
expressed by a human being (Jesus).
Not exact matches
As the fourth industrial revolution, otherwise known as Industry 4.0 or I4.0, builds momentum around artificial intelligence, robotics and machine learning, one of the biggest concerns
expressed is whether
human workers will
be replaced
by robots.
In
human society this aspiration
is expressed by a desire to find significances and uses for things which otherwise have none, assigning meaning to things
by virtue of their affinity to other things or personalities available in the natural world.
By this word, in the New Testament as in the Old, the noblest altitudes and attributes of the
human spirit and the saving influences of the divine spirit
were expressed.
Another way to say it would
be to observe that my story testifies to the truth of the position the Christian church has held with almost total unanimity throughout the centuries — namely, that homosexuality
was not God's original creative intention for humanity, that it
is, on the contrary, a tragic sign of
human nature and relationships
being fractured
by sin, and therefore that homosexual practice goes against God's
express will for all
human beings, especially those who trust in Christ.»
I think scripture
is a rich metaphor created
by human in an attempt to understand the presence of evil in the world, as well as to
express their hope that it will end.
Two sentences in the discussion of reason in the earlier version of the report could
be taken to support the use of such analysis: «
By reason we relate our witness to the full range of
human knowledge and experience,» and «
By our quest for reasoned understandings of Christian faith we seek to grasp and
express the gospel in a way that will commend itself to thoughtful persons who
are seeking to know and follow God's ways.»
On the other hand, it can refer to the act
by which the self constitutes itself as a self; the public acts of word and deed
are just ways of
expressing this inner act which corresponds to the more primary meaning of «
human act.
God's aim for some
human events, on the other hand, will
be such that, if his will
is actualized to a high degree
by the person, the event will effectively
express God's
being.
On the other hand, without the dramatic and poetic expression of the reversal in God's love play, when Krishna
is conquered
by Radha and the divine bows to the
human, the full reality that the devotee experiences would not
be expressed.
What I have found most relevant
is Colossians ch.3 in the light of which it
is legitimate to speak of the gospel as the news of the New Man Jesus Christ («Put on the new self, the new humanity»); and more especially it
is valid to present the new fellowship of mutual forgiveness created
by the Divine Forgiveness in Christ and
expressed in the Eucharist and the social koinonia of the church as the foretaste of true
human community as the essential gospel («Forgiving one another as the Lord forgave you»).
By combining two Greek words for feminine and masculine traits, viz., thelis (female, fruitful, prolific, nourishing, tender, delicate) and arrhen (male, masculine, manly, strong), the word «thelarrheny» can
be invented.3 Thelarrheny
expresses the view that
humans combine the traits (but not physical sex organs) of both female and male.
By the same token, to affirm the necessity of exercising
human responsibility
is not to
express a naive confidence in our ability to solve all our problems if we simply put our minds to it.
Recent papers on process thought and feminism have used the term «androgynous to depict the range of maleness / femaleness
expressed in both
humans and God.1 In a similar sense, «gynandrous» has
been proposed.2 To
be sure, the aim
is to capture,
by means of an appropriate term, the rich texture of
human differences, that one
is neither strictly «female» or «male» but a creative combination of the qualities historically assigned to both.
The longing to belong in some ultimate sense, to feel an at - homeness in the universe
is satisfied for many in worship which reawakens the awareness of «the mystical unity which underlies all
human life» (Cyril Richardson) This experience
is energizing, feeding, and healing; it overcomes the sense of cosmic loneliness, the feeling
expressed by a mental hospital patient: «I
'm an orphan in the universe.»
To see (in addition to the theological or ethical values
being expressed) the depth world of
human beings coming to the surface
is in no way to replace the one
by the other, or to set the one over against the other.
That insight
is nothing other than the understanding that while in one sense God
is indeed unalterable in his faithfulness, his love, and his welcome to his
human children, in another sense the opportunities offered to him to
express just such an attitude depend to a very considerable degree upon the way in which what has taken place in the world provides for God precisely such an opening on the
human side; and it
is used
by him to deepen his relationship and thereby enrich both himself and the life of those children.
The capacity to speak, symbolized
by the physical tongue,
is the primary way through which we
human beings express ourselves, and nothing reveals more deeply the biblical insight into the sinfulness and brokenness of
human life than our verbal means of self - expression.
This organic conception
is another way of
expressing, in the sphere of
human relationships, what we have consistently designated
by the word «community».
For some, it
is ordained
by God; for others, it arises from the nature of
human beings, even if we
are evolutionary accidents; or it may simply
express the requirements for anything recognizable as a society.
He resists Novilla's sterile ethos
by instead holding up experiences that
are weighted with «all the gravity of bloodletting and sacrifice,» experiences that
express the
human condition in its fullness, whether religious, romantic, or familial.
Recent papers on process thought and feminism have used the term «androgynous to depict the range of maleness / femaleness
expressed in both
humans and God.1 In a similar sense, «gynandrous» has
been proposed.2 To
be sure, the aim
is to capture,
by means of an appropriate term, the rich texture of
human differences, that one
is...
To suggest that we ought to return to «orthodoxy»
is to suggest that we can best
express our faith today
by disregarding the development of
human philosophy subsequent to the original, or «orthodox» expression of that faith.
These words
are not the dominion of God, they
are words... created
by human beings to
express their feelings toward a particular subject.
Symbols still maintain contact with the deep sources of life; they
express, we may say, the «lived» spiritual... they disclose that the modalities of the Spirit
are at the same time manifestations of Life, and,
by consequence, directly engage
human existence....
The programme sets out marriage as the morally right context within which sexual intimacy may
be expressed while, of course, acknowledging that this moral teaching
is rejected
by many and infringed
by others through
human weakness.
Nowadays this worry
is often
expressed by speaking of Barth's supposed «extrinsicism,» that
is, his presentation of the Christian faith in terms of an encounter (or collision) of divine and
human wills in which creatures
are kept separate from God's
being.
A comprehensive view of
human being is memorably
expressed by Reinhold Niebuhr, in the opening chapter of The Nature and Destiny of Man:
This optimistic approach to man's virtue and the problem of evil
expresses itself philosophically as the idea of progress in history.17 The empirical method of modern culture has
been successful in understanding nature; but, when applied to an understanding of
human nature, it
was blind to some obvious facts about
human nature that simpler cultures apprehended
by the wisdom of common sense.
As these illustrations suggest, congregations
are only one of several sorts of collectivities
by which
human beings corporately
express their religion.
It
is the realm of art: the effort to
express by one's chosen medium the inexpressible, something of the wonder and mystery with which
human life
is suffused and sub merged.
The Darwinian metaphor of evolution
was used to
express a faith in a Historical future, in either the coming end of History (Marx) or a more indefinite perfectibility in which our alienating technological progress would finally
be ennobled
by a corresponding moral progress (say, John Stuart Mill or Walt Whitman) that would
be the source of the elusive
human happiness promised
by modern liberation.
Simplistic growth models such as unfolding flowers
are deceptively attractive but inadequate when applied to the complexities of
human life The recognition that «dying» precedes rebirth
is a valuable part of ancient Christian wisdom (
expressed symbolically
by crucifixion preceding resurrection).
Human integrity should
be judged
by two criteria: (1) the steadfastness of character it
expresses, and (2) the values chosen as the basis for that integrity, for they must
be sufficiently inclusive in order to serve as a satisfactory guide for the resolution of all particular crises.
I maintained that, contrary to the commonly
expressed or tacitly accepted view, the era of active evolution did not end with the appearance of the
human zoological type: for
by virtue of his acquirement of the gift of individual reflection Man displays the extraordinary quality of
being able to totalize himself collectively upon himself, thus extending on a planetary scale the fundamental vital process which causes matter, under Certain conditions, to organize itself in elements which
are ever more complex physically, and psychologically ever more centrated.
The significance of intuitions
is also indicated
by Bergson's view that it
is by intuition that
humans have access to reality It
is also significant that these intuitions
are expressed in metaphorical language (in «fluid» thoughts).
20This
is not, however, to say that all interest
is «biased» or «ideological» in the sense that it
expresses, in Ogden's words, «a more or less comprehensive understanding of
human existence, or how to exist and act as a
human being, that functions to justify the interests of a particular group or individual
by representing these interests as the demands of disinterested justice» (The Point of Christology [San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1982], p. 94).
It can mean, then, the development of those principles which most adequately
express what we experience and know, in the full range of our
human encounters; and the result
is a «vision» which can
be tested
by reference back to experience and to the world experienced.
In this respect Enns, an evangelical,
is close to Catholic theology,
expressed by Pius XII in Divino Afflante Spiritu: «Just as the substantial Word of God became like men in every respect except sin, so too the words of God,
expressed in
human languages, became like
human language in every respect except error.»
Expressed in a manner which
is truly
human, these actions promote that mutual self - giving
by which spouses enrich each other with a joyful and a ready will» (my emphasis).
The three books — Science and the Modern World, Process and Reality, Adventures of Ideas —
are an endeavor to
express a way 0f understanding the nature of things, and to point out how that way of understanding
is illustrated
by a survey of the mutations of
human experience.
Rather, it
is a gospel of the free experience of God's engagement in the lives of God's people, which
is freely and creatively
expressed according to the particularities of various
human communities, especially as represented
by the Dalits and Adivasis.
We have only to open our eyes, to understand how dearly we
are loved
by a creator who
is not malevolent, who understands our
human condition, who despite our sad history continues to
express faith, hope and love for us
by these daily decision to create life in the form of innocent children and then to entrust them to us.
He will mistrust or reject, however, specific moral maxims which,
by their universality and eternally permanent character, claim to bind men in every situation without exception, on the sole condition that the universal norm,
expressing an essence,
is relevant to the particular
human being in this or that definite situation, precisely because of the presence there of what the maxim in question designates and applies to.
It
is a process that has involved various levels of
human invention,
expressing itself mainly in the development of technology and various other fields of
human knowledge and endeavor, and I should add emphatically the various stages of
human hubris that has
expressed itself in the oppression and conquest of peoples
by other peoples.
As James Hopewell points out, the distinctiveness of this social form can
be seen
by contrasting it with other «sorts of collectivities
by which
humans corporately
express their religion.»
... Since man enjoys the capacity for a free personal choice in truth... the right to religious freedom should
be viewed as innate to the fundamental dignity of every
human person... all people
are «impelled
by nature and also bound
by our moral obligation to seek the truth, especially religious truth» (Second Vatican Council, Dignitatis Humanae, 2)... let me
express my sincere hope that your expertise in the fields of law, political science, sociology and economics will converge in these days to bring about fresh insights on this important question andthus bear much fruit now and into the future.
Above all, though, Paul VI's concern and care for the family
is expressed at length in the Council's Pastoral Constitution on the Church in the Modern World, Gaudium et Spes, which notes that «the well -
being of the individual person and of
human and Christian society
is intimately linked with the healthy condition of that community produced
by marriage and family».
The idea that the aim of
human evolution
is the unfolding of the
human being, the creation of «wealthy»
human being who has overcome the contradiction between self and nature and achieved true freedom,
is expressed in many passages of Capital, written
by the mature and old Marx.