However, we know that in the middle ages, Greenland was much warmer and had less
extensive ice coverage (thus the name Greenland and the successful attempt to farm it for over a century)
If the previous melt was localised around Spitzbergen, why hasn't he offered any evidence of
extensive ice coverage elsewhere at the time?
Not exact matches
If you'll recall from my previous post, polar bears seem to have barely survived the
extensive sea
ice coverage during the Last Glacial Maximum — in other words, too much
ice (even over the short term) is their biggest threat.
Negative delta C - 13 (as) values in glacial AABW were likely caused by poor ventilation during formation, probably associated with
extensive sea
ice coverage.