Meier (NASA Goddard), 4.88 (± 0.43), Statistical This method is a simple statistical method that uses previous years» daily rates of
extent change to project the 2015 daily extent through the end of September.
Meier (NASA Goddard), 5.09 (+ / - 0.62), Statistical This method is a simple statistical method that uses previous years» daily rates of
extent change to project the 2015 daily extent through the end of September.
Not exact matches
These forward - looking statements include, among other things, statements about full - year 2018 guidance,
project milestones, increased opportunities in the market, backlog, bids and
change orders outstanding, target
projects and revenue opportunity pipeline,
to the
extent these may be viewed as indicators of future revenues or profitability, the expected impacts of the F2G program and progress toward completing the proposed combination with CB&I and the anticipated benefits of that transaction.
Forward - looking statements may include, among others, statements concerning our
projected adjusted income (loss) from operations outlook for 2018, on both a consolidated and segment basis;
projected total revenue growth and global medical customer growth, each over year end 2017;
projected growth beyond 2018;
projected medical care and operating expense ratios and medical cost trends; our
projected consolidated adjusted tax rate; future financial or operating performance, including our ability
to deliver personalized and innovative solutions for our customers and clients; future growth, business strategy, strategic or operational initiatives; economic, regulatory or competitive environments, particularly with respect
to the pace and
extent of
change in these areas; financing or capital deployment plans and amounts available for future deployment; our prospects for growth in the coming years; the proposed merger (the «Merger») with Express Scripts Holding Company («Express Scripts») and other statements regarding Cigna's future beliefs, expectations, plans, intentions, financial condition or performance.
For my post-doctoral
project, I decided
to focus on the question, «
to what
extent can atmospheric pollutants, such as CO2 and ozone, exert a selective effect on woody plant species, and how are the resulting
changes in the genetic composition of the plant community likely
to affect the animals that feed on them?»
The models used
to project future climate
changes and their impacts are not especially good at simulating the size, speed, and
extent of
The meeting notes and action plans completed by the study groups, along with the monthly notes and end - of - year report completed by the facilitators, were used
to further describe the
extent of implementation of the
change process at the
project schools.
The
extent to which actual future Part A and Part B costs exceed the
projected current - law amounts due
to changes to the productivity adjustments and physician payments depends on both the specific
changes that might be legislated and on whether Congress would pass further provisions
to help offset such costs.
The irony seems
to be that the real world shows signs of more dramatic
changes than the GCMs
project, especially if you look at the sea - ice
extent.
They do address the issue: «the
extent to which El Nino serves as a useful analogue for the mechanisms behind the
projected shear
changes should be further examined» and they also note that Atlantic wind shear is infueneced by other factors besides the Walker circulation.
The
extent to which the
project has positive co-benefits for other aspects of society, in addition
to its climate
change mitigation and CO2 reductions.
Vinnikov et al. (1999) used the aforementioned GFDL and Hadley Centre climate models, forced by greenhouse gases and sulfate aerosols,
to project how Arctic sea ice
extent would
change in the future.
The
project looks at whether and
to what
extent climate
change is already affecting the magnitude and frequency of extreme weather events on the continent.
Meier et al, 4.5, + / -0.3, Statistical This statistical method uses previous years» daily
extent change rates from August 1 through September 30
to calculate
projected daily
extents starting from July 31.
Meier, 4.78 (± 0.34), Statistical This method uses daily
extent change rates
to project the 2014
extent on July 31 through the end of September.
But because many extreme weather factors weren't or can't yet be calculated, he said the study «can at best only provide a very lower limit on the
extent of damages likely
to result from
projected climate
changes.»»
A question that needs
to be further addressed is the
extent to which
projected changes in Greenland ice sheet melting could affect the amount and location of
Meier et al, 4.6, + / -0.5 Statistical This statistical method uses previous years» daily
extent change rates from July 1 through September 30
to calculate
projected daily
extents starting from June 30.
Models
project changes in the future ranges of many species (Peterson et al., 2002; Price and Glick, 2002; Crick, 2004), some suggesting that the ranges of migrants may shift
to a greater
extent than non-migrants (Price and Root, 2001).
The
project aims
to provide well - verified assessments of the
extent to which such weather - related risks have
changed due
to human influences on climate and
to identify those types of weather events where our scientific understanding is not advanced enough
to make a robust assessment of attributable risk.
The models used
to project future climate
changes and their impacts are not especially good at simulating the size, speed, and
extent of
To the extent that we are a world - altering species — and I do think it's pretty clear that we've been at this project for a very long time — what makes us very destructive, unfortunately, is our capacity to change things on a time scale that is orders of magnitude faster than other creatures can evolve to deal wit
To the
extent that we are a world - altering species — and I do think it's pretty clear that we've been at this
project for a very long time — what makes us very destructive, unfortunately, is our capacity
to change things on a time scale that is orders of magnitude faster than other creatures can evolve to deal wit
to change things on a time scale that is orders of magnitude faster than other creatures can evolve
to deal wit
to deal with.
For DJF (figure 4a), the spatial
extent of the maximum and minimum areas
projected to experience the highest climate
changes under a global warming of 4 °C is very different, highlighting the uncertainty that mostly originates from the different temperature
changes projected by the models.
Meier et al. (National Snow and Ice Data Center); 4.7 ± 0.6; Statistical This statistical method uses previous years» daily
extent change rates from July 1 through September 30
to calculate
projected daily
extents starting from June 30.
Their platform remains unclear in the
extent to which these
changes would impact existing
projects like Kinder Morgan.