Sentences with phrase «extra warming effect»

Since, on average, aerosols have a cooling effect (although some absorbing aerosols like black carbon (soot) are actually adding to global warming), reducing current aerosol levels (particularly sulphates) is equivalent to an extra warming effect.

Already, in areas where sulfur - rich fuels are regulated, the researchers find a significant extra warming effect over 20 years.

Not exact matches

Extra carbon dioxide means a warmer world — and then positive feedback effects from things like water vapour and ice loss will make it warmer still

In effect, O3 delivers global warming via two routes: the 0.35 watt - per - meter - squared (w / m2) extra heat it traps directly and the as much as 15 percent less vegetation that grows worldwide as a result of O3 damage.

This 2006 study found that the effect of amplifying feedbacks in the climate system — where global warming boosts atmospheric CO2 levels — «will promote warming by an extra 15 percent to 78 percent on a century - scale» compared to typical estimates by the U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

Hang it on the shoulders for a chic effect and have that extra layer to keep you warm!

It IS TRUE as Arrhenius showed in 1896, that more CO2 results in extra absorbtions of energy photons, which results in a longer transport time hence warming by CO2 (ie the Greenhouse Effect.)

Its magnitude is consistent with the calculated greenhouse effect — extra warming from trapped heat radiation.

And I think this issue of climate sensitivity doesn't consider where those extra GHGs come from and «nature's sensitivity» to the warming & its many effects.

Combine with Co2 warming the surface and it can just so happen that the two effects cancel at the surface for a «pause» while the wind / current driven heating of the subsurface causes extra heating in the subsurface.

Do you agree that when the heating effect of extra CO2 is due almost exclusively to what it itself absorbs from outside, but the cooling effect entails an ability to dissipate heat from the additional source, cooling can now outweigh warming?

A different perspective on the same problem: (try expanding your views a little) THE GREENHOUSE EFFECT: The is no argument that extra GHG absorbtion causes warming within the radiative transport mechanism.

Some say that at the current level of 380 parts per million we are close to saturation as regards more warming effect from extra CO2.

Which explains why people always talk about the effect of «doubling of CO2» rather than the more easy to understand «for each extra 10ppm you get xK warming»

Rider: If CO2 does help warm the air (or the globe in general), does the extra warmth disappear soon after, with no significant effect on climate?

As a result, according to the data, there is no sign of any EXTRA warming due to the green house effect due to human emission of CO2.

Basically the same process occurs on Earth and other planets, and that is why we are at a «standstill» — because all the extra carbon dioxide has no warming effect whatsoever..

Many places refuse to turn over climate data, BEST adjusted and cherry picked much of the data they used, Coastal areas appear to be heavily effected by coastal winds that are likely very very poorly documented, Non-coastal wind effected areas seem to have little to no warming, «Free» / online unadjusted data appears to be mostly at or near satellite data start thus provides little extra info about the past, Looking for help from anyone who has Europe based original data outside of the «taxpayer funded yet refuse to turn over data to the public / taxpayer groups».

With the transformation of a Pacific typhoon into an extra tropical cyclone we can easily see a direct link between a warmer Pacific and he coming outbreak of cold weather next week in the US.The effect on the jet stream is the key.

R. Gates: With the transformation of a Pacific typhoon into an extra tropical cyclone we can easily see a direct link between a warmer Pacific and he coming outbreak of cold weather next week in the US.The effect on the jet stream is the key.

So if the atmosphere is not warming, it means the extra GHGs are having no significant effect.

To add an extra dose of comic opera to the whole thing, the image that accompanies Carroll's article is borrowed from the 2004 film The Day After Tomorrow, in which the effect of global warming is demonstrated by showing New York City covered in snow.

This 2006 study found that the effect of amplifying feedbacks in the climate system — where global warming boosts atmospheric CO2 levels — «will promote warming by an extra 15 percent to 78 percent on a century - scale» compared to typical estimates by the U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

The greenhouse effect from that extra water vapor will then cause additional warming that gets added to the original warming from carbon dioxide.

Basically, Dr Ferenc Miskolczi's life as a NASA climate research scientist was made hell because he discovered that the extra water vapour being evaporated is not having a positive - feedback (increasing the CO2 warming effect by absorbing more infrared from the sun), instead it is going into increased cloud cover, which reflects incoming sunlight back to space.

This extra CO2, which has been stored underground for millions of years, is too much for the normal greenhouse effect to manage, so the CO2 is capturing more of the sun's heat This is the main cause of global warming.

The temperature to space re-equilibrates, but that means the surface is warmer because of the extra surface insulating effect of the CO2.

Apart from albedo the extra 45 W / m2 over high latitude (ice / snow free) landmass in summer would have a considerable effect in warming the climate.

That downwelling happens constantly even at night and worldwide and it has been theorised by global warming proponents that extra downwelling infrared from more greenhouse gases is at the heart of the proposed climate effect from human sources of CO2.

Extra DLR has the same effect but does not also provide additional energy to penetrate more deeply and make up its own deficit so that deficit also has to come from the DLR thus there can be no DLR left over to warm the system.

While the rising temperatures of global warming may be pushing the atmosphere towards greater extremes of weather - with all the destructive potential that implies - that extra heat is also having an effect on the oceans.

With other greenhouse gases it is responsible for the natural greenhouse effect, and the extra levels of CO 2 from burning of fossil fuels (coal, oil and natural gas) in industry, transport and the generation of electricity, are causing the enhanced (or accelerated) greenhouse effect which is why global warming is happening.

Others accept (correctly) that that is unlikely due to the thermal inertia of our oceans and their cooling effect on the air so they propose an «ocean skin'theory whereby warming of the topmost molecules on the ocean surface from extra downwelling infra red radiation from extra human CO2 in the air is supposed to reduce the natural energy flow from sea to air so that the oceans get warmer and then heat the air and kill us off that way.

As regards a warming of the ocean skin, evaporation is a continuous process caused by temperaure, density and pressure (not just temperature) differentials between water and air so that the rate of evaporation accelerates when a water surface is warmed such as from the warming effect of extra greenhouse gases (especially if the air is dry).

On that basis alone the cooling effect of the oceans would dictate that it would take many millennia for any warming effect in the air from extra CO2 to become measurable let alone dangerous.

The suggestion that there are no solar effects seems to contradict observations and the suggestion that extra infra red warms the oceans on timescales that are meaningful is against logic given the net cooling effect of evaporation.

We've changed lots of other things, a little extra warming may not only cause sudden climate change (The Gulf Stream is a frequently cited example), but help to prevent it or attenuate its effects.

It is not seen that any «extra energy» is surface incident at present, or such that is in any manner capable of creating unnatural warming by a «greenhouse effect».

De Witt, are you saying «THS???» because you don't know it stands for tropical hot spot [which I can't believe] or because you don't get the connection between backradiation and a THS, which I understood to be the case because the Troposphere would warm faster than the surface since it is being heated by a warmer surface, to wit, the surface of the planet which is getting warmed by the aforesaid backradiation; and in addition to but not withstanding that the troposphere whould also rise which would be another aspect of the THS, with the final characteristic being that said THS would occur in the tropics where the warming effect of extra water would be most pronounced, also as a consequence of backradiation?