And you are talking, in the main, to people who proudly claim to accept nothing without proof (or maybe nothing extraordinary
without extraordinary proof).
Remember... extraordinary claims require
extraordinary proof.
What's that expression, Chad — «extraordinary claims require
extraordinary proof» — sounds reasonable to me.
The behavior of the believer or non-believer has nothing to do with the story... and the story is certainly extraordinary... which, by the way, requires
extraordinary proof.
kate, extraordinary claims require
extraordinary proof.
That is an extraordinary claim, like the claim that people were healed simply by touching Vespatian's robes as he passed by, so it requires
extraordinary proof that it actually happened, right?
Extraordinary claims require
extraordinary proof.
Quoting the bible isn't objective or
extraordinary proof.
Another reason to use skepticism when theorizing about the life of the real Jesus is that extraordinary claims require
extraordinary proof.
In some circles, Moyzis says, to suggest that natural selection is acting on the human brain is tantamount to heresy — an incredible hypothesis that demands
extraordinary proof.
Until then, anxious Mars researchers keep mulling the late Carl Sagan's constant admonition: Extraordinary claims require
extraordinary proof.
But extraordinary claims require
extraordinary proof.
One of Schmidt's favorite sayings is «extraordinary claims require
extraordinary proof».