Not exact matches
The Republican Party's fast journey from debating how to combat human - caused
climate change to arguing that it does
not exist is a story of big political money, Democratic hubris in the Obama years and a partisan chasm that grew over nine years like a crack in the Antarctic shelf, favouring
extreme positions and uncompromising rhetoric over co-operation and conciliation.
There's still a lot we don't know about why some weather is so
extreme and how much
climate change is to blame (especially when it comes to hurricanes).
Loss of essential grassland habitat, increased use of toxic pesticides, reduced availability of
nesting grounds, disease, and a
changing climate with
extreme weather patterns have all played a role in their decline.
Environment secretary faces calls for his resignation, as Green campaigners warn that a
climate change sceptic should
not be in post during
extreme weather events
Unless... Suppose David Cameron and Nick Clegg announced that they agreed with Ed Miliband's warning over the weekend that Britain is «sleepwalking to a crisis», and that «
climate change threatens national security» — and went on to commit themselves to working together on a long - term plan to protect the nation
not just from
extreme weather conditions but the other consequences of
climate change.
The visitor to the institution who identified series of challenges confronting the nation including «infant mortality,
extreme poverty, insecurity,
climate change, the rabid activities of terrorists, described these problems as monsters which can
not be allowed to prowl the street without being controlled.
«While we can
not say the (Hoosick Falls) storm was caused by
climate change, incidences of severe weather and flooding such as this have a higher probability in a globally warmed
climate,» said Ross Lazear, an instructor at the University at Albany who studies
extreme weather and weather forecasting.
The environment secretary faced calls for his resignation today, as Green campaigners warned that a
climate change sceptic should
not be left at Cabinet level during
extreme weather conditions.
He didn't utter the words «
climate change» but Gov. Andrew Cuomo said at a news conference earlier today that weather is getting more
extreme and dangerous, forcing New York to rethink how it builds its infrastructure and transportation.
Ruling out natural variability, scientists say several of 2016's
extreme weather events wouldn't have happened without human - caused
climate change.
The problem, says Matthews, is that historical data is
not a very good guide to the future of freshwater resources — particularly now that
extreme water conditions have been exacerbated by a rapidly
changing climate.
«This new way of viewing the problem could be a game changer in the attribution of
extreme events by providing a framework to quantify the portion of the damage that can be attributed to
climate change — even for events that themselves can
not be directly attributed to
climate change using traditional methods,» continues Hammerling.
In fact, one symptom of a
changing climate could be more varied or more
extreme weather — but a couple of heavy snows wouldn't prove that either.
Whether or
not farmers agree about the causes or even existence of
climate change, researchers agree that farmers still have to prepare their farms for the consequences of rising temperatures, increased atmospheric CO2 and more
extreme weather events.
While the trends associated with
climate change — hotter days, heavier rainfall and a greater number of
extreme weather events — are present in the models, for many crops in Africa and Asia it's
not clear how extensive the effects will be.
This does
not mean, of course, that individual
extreme events (such as the 2003 European heat wave) can be said to be simply «caused» by human - induced
climate change — usually such events are complex, with many causes.
The IPCC's
climate report says that the most
extreme scenarios of future warming are looking less likely — but this doesn't
change the big picture
«People are pretty certain of where they stand on
climate change, and
extreme weather does
not really move the needle much,» he said.
Steffen was
not surprised by the finding that
climate change led to an increase in the likelihood of such an
extreme summer.
Since
climate change is already leading to higher average temperatures overall, the finding that
extremes are also more likely was
not surprising, said Sophie Lewis, a
climate scientist at the University of Melbourne and the
climate system science center and the lead author on the paper.
The reality (at least according to current science) is that the effects of
climate change on
extremes won't be detected for many decades.
While the frequency of
extreme events is increasing, in combating
climate change «there's this feeling that we have options we didn't have before,» he said.
«If one lives in Canada's north or in our coastal communities, or really in any community that is subject to
extreme weather conditions, and the resulting floods, droughts, and wildfires, the effects of
climate change itself, can
not be denied.
«Unfortunately the fact that Kimberley corals are
not immune to bleaching suggests that corals living in naturally
extreme temperature environments are just as threatened by
climate change as corals elsewhere,» says Dr Schoepf.
Climatologist John Christy of the University of Alabama, Huntsville, emphasized that it was
not scientifically defensible to tie the recent droughts or specific
extreme weather events to
climate change, and highlighted the limitations of historical temperature records.
The team doesn't directly attribute the die - offs to
climate change, but if
extreme drought episodes become more frequent in the tropics — as
climate models predict they will — the lions could suffer, Packer says.
Dr Li said the latest research findings give a better understanding of
changes in human - perceived equivalent temperature, and indicate global warming has stronger long - term impacts on human beings under both
extreme and non-
extreme weather conditions, suggesting that
climate change adaptation can
not just focus on heat wave events, but should be extended to the whole range of effects of temperature increases.
Extreme weather events like Harvey are expected to become more likely as Earth's
climate changes due to greenhouse gas emissions, and scientists don't understand how
extreme weather will impact invasive pests, pollinators and other species that affect human well - being.
It ranks
extreme weather events as second only to international conflicts, with natural catastrophes,
not acting on
climate change and water crises all featuring in the top 10.
Vulnerability to winter weather depends on many non-
climate factors, including housing, age, and baseline health.185, 186 While deaths and injuries related to
extreme cold events are projected to decline due to
climate change, these reductions are
not expected to compensate for the increase in heat - related deaths.187, 188,189
And last winter may
not have been a fluke: Those kinds of
extremes — years of deluge and years of drought — are already becoming more common as
climate change accelerates.
The thing about
climate change: it doesn't hit home, until it (literally) hits home —
extreme storms, droughts, flash floods and accelerating sea level rise triggering more frequent coastal flooding.
Then, consider that this creature you may have heard of for the first time 30 seconds ago comes from a group of animals
not only nearing extinction, but unthinkably ancient and the survivor of several
extreme climate change events.
But now
climate change hysteria has taken on new, more
extreme witch - hunting dimensions that are on par with, if
not even surpassing, those of the Dark Ages — a time -LSB-...]
Such mixed results aren't unusual in attribution science, which seeks to look for the causes, whether
climate change or natural fluctuations, that
change the odds of
extreme weather events.
«In the past, a typical
climate scientist's response to questions about
climate change's role in any given
extreme weather event was, «We can
not attribute any single event to
climate change.»
«The field of
extreme event attribution is
not just about anthropogenic
climate change,» Sobel said.
«For a long time, the standard answer of
climate scientists to an
extreme event was «we can't attribute single events to
climate change», which when you think about it is an incredibly naive position.
«Simple physics (effect of [sea - level rise] on storm surge) and simple thermodynamics (i.e. Clausius - Clapeyron) are valid whether or
not we can trust the models to get the specifics dynamical linkages between
climate change and
extreme weather events right (and I'm deeply skeptical the models are up to this task at present).»
Single
extreme events can
not be simply and directly attributed to anthropogenic
climate change, as there is always a finite chance the event in question might have occurred naturally.
«Harvey was
not caused by
climate change, yet its impacts — the storm surge, and especially the extreme rainfall — very likely worsened due to human - caused global warming,» said Stefan Rahmstorf, a researcher with the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, in a sta
climate change, yet its impacts — the storm surge, and especially the
extreme rainfall — very likely worsened due to human - caused global warming,» said Stefan Rahmstorf, a researcher with the Potsdam Institute for
Climate Impact Research, in a sta
Climate Impact Research, in a statement.
I have a question for you — as you know, «
climate change» is happening... whether human caused or
not, it certainly feels like we are seeing more
extreme weathers of late.
Their point was that the rate of new
extreme values can be attributed and therefore their conclusion amounts to «Seing
N new records...» (rather than «Seing this new record») has odds of 1:1 e5 - 1e6 of being
climate change.
So while scientists can
not attribute Hurricane Katrina, drought, or other
extreme weather events to
climate change, they can say
climate change increases the risk of these occurring.
Imagine, say, a bell - shaped curve based on the null hypothesis that
climate change is
not happening (and
not having an impact on increasing
extreme weather events), and there is this really long tail out to infinity; and supposing we get an off - the - charts category 7 hurricane in January, we still can
not attribute it or its extra intensity or unusual seasonality to
climate change, even if there is only a one in kazillion chance it might occur without
climate change having an effect — that is, it is way out there in the very tiny tail of this null hypothesis curve that fades out into infinity — the tail that says, afterall, anything's possible.
It is certainly
not the case that there is demonstrable link between every
extreme and
climate change (and indeed, some
extremes — like bitter cold spells — are predicted to become less frequent).
Because the title is comparing Hegerl's results
not with the standard range, but with the subject of your post, namely «recent research suggesting that the
climate may be susceptible to
extreme increases in temperature», noting that «Several studies have found that the temperature
change may be higher than 16.2 ºF (9ºC).
The millions of people all over the world who have already experienced mass destruction of their homes, livelihoods, food supply and / or water supply as a result of AGW - driven
climate change and
extreme weather might
not agree that the
changes we have seen so far are «
not catastrophic».
This is exactly what
Climate Change looks like as it's IMPACTS are happening in the real world (versus in the scientific theory papers)-- all kind sof unexpected unplanned for
extreme events and a built infrastructure and building
not up to the
extreme demands of topdays
extreme weather events across an entire Continent.
But it's possible, and even if this particular disaster is
not attributable to
climate change, it still exemplifies very well what the risks from
extreme precipitation «look like», in the Bay area and around the world.