Sentences with phrase «extreme end of the range»

Steib said it's been proven that «if you have a lot of stress, at the extreme end of the range, you become a poorer decision maker, you have a very hard time performing tasks, and you underperform other people in cognitive and physical feats when you're highly stressed out,» Steib said.

The more extreme end of that range is considered by some to be «normal» in some breeds (to name some more: Corgis, Basset, Lhasa Apso, and Pekingese).

I stand by the points I made regarding the use of the extreme scenarios to drive policy without any clarification that they are both hypothetical and at the extreme end of the range.

Only because the constant volume case brackets one extreme end of a range that the constant pressure case brackets at the other end.

Not exact matches

For instance, a portfolio with an allocation of 49 % domestic stocks, 21 % international stocks, 25 % bonds, and 5 % short - term investments would have generated average annual returns of almost 9 % over the same period, albeit with a narrower range of extremes on the high and low end.

The UN's 17 Sustainable Development Goals are aimed at achieving equality, securing global peace and ending extreme poverty — an ambitious agenda that will require a wide - range of conditions to be met.

What seems to be happening is that we in the U.K. are getting more extremes of weather at either end of our normal range.

In summary, all placental and negative control samples were at the extreme low end of the range detectable by qPCR (Additional file 2: Figure S1A — C).

By the end of the week, the Northeast is likely to feel the effects of the cold snap, though temperatures will be a little less extreme and likely in the 8 ° -14 °F below normal range.

There is a concern for injury when athletes who have hyper - mobile joints reach their end range of motion during weightlifting because the body is not maximally stable in these extreme positions.

The Land Rover Discovery and Range Rover are closer to the extreme off - road end of the scale.

At World Climate Report, we believe, that instead of having an equal likelihood of occurrence, that the temperature rise during the next 50 to 100 years will lie closer to the low end of the IPCC projected range than to the high end of the range and thus the overall impacts will tend towards the modest rather than the extreme.

Secondly, the range of solar changes from 1700 is from 0.05 % to at the extreme end 0.5 %, however, the potential range from 1850 onwards is smaller, and since 1950 has probably declined or stayed steady.

Gavin also identified the time dependant inconsistencies between solar insolation and measured temperatures: 1st response: «Secondly, the range of solar changes from 1700 is from 0.05 % to at the extreme end 0.5 %, however, the potential range from 1850 onwards is smaller, and since 1950 has probably declined or stayed steady.»

Extremes are the infrequent events at the high and low end of the range of values of a particular variable.

The result would be changed by a prior with a singularity at the end point of either range or some other really extreme prior, but not by any prior considered plausible by most.

Curry not only takes the extreme range of this — which is illogical since, contorted arguments to argue otherwise aside, she even goes beyond it: to, as quoted above, ludicrously conclude from all this that not only is it not just «reasonably possible» that half could be due to natural variation that just happens to coincide with what we would expect to see from the atmospheric alteration inadvertently undertaken, but that rather than it being somewhere in the middle of up to half being due to variability, or a similarly large portion in fact being veiled, but all of what «could» on the one end of the range be, in fact, IS, but then goes beyond that.

In other words, of the possible variation which Curry first suggests, off of the extreme reading that the «could be» one end of the equation = - the one that just happens to have the maximum plausible natural variability that the IPCC could even reasonably conceive, in Curry's estimation, be exactly what the natural variability here in fact IS, but then from there goes extreme again, and concludes that within her own plus minus 20 % range — guess what — IT ALSO goes in the extreme direction, away from the mean of natural variability averaging out and the change we see is our influence (which assuredly it is not, but the point is it is impossible to pinpoint any small range, though Curry here does it anyway) so that in effect IT IS 50 % to 60 % (or 70 % when she adds on that «anthropogenic is 50 % or less.

In essence, Curry takes that extreme, or the extreme but reasonably plausible, although not likely end of the range, as the new mean, narrows he total range from there, and then adds more to that extreme by opting in the directin of even more «coincidental» natural variability on top of that.

Not only that, Curry goes past it, to, somewhat fantastically, conclude that «My assessment is that it is > 2/3 likely that there is such an extreme end «coincidental» natural variability mimicking effect (just as laid out above) and then on to say — after limiting the range of possible natural variability («coincidentally» enough) to only that which is close to this high «could» be (acc» to the IPCC) state of 50 %» natural» effect (that is, giving that itself only a 20 percent range in either direction (meaning, depending on interpretation, either a positive40 % or 30 % floor to the input of «natural» and a ceiling of 60 to 70 %)-RRB-, and thereby negating any possibility of the opposite — TO, again, the new mean representing the one directional and full extent of what, could plausibly be natural variability, and then concluding from there that «At this point, I think anthropogenic is 50 % or less.»

Over its 350 year instrumental course, it has swung wildly between these extremes seen at either end of the record, encompassing decadal figures ranging from -0.7 C to plus 0.45 C along the way (figure 3) These extremes are not replicated in figure 2, whose results are unrecognisable when compared to the actual CET temperature statistics.

The problem was that «the moment that one talks of a «range» or «band» of reasonable responses one is conjuring up the possibility of extreme views at either end of the band or range».

Recent judicial experience suggests that wide application of the protean concept of proportionality would require the development of additional doctrinal tools (such as deference) in order to ensure that the proportionality test is applied with appropriate intensity across the wide spectrum of administrative law cases, ranging from fundamental rights on one end to purely economic interests at the other extreme.

However, if it is understood that if Bitcoin succeeds there will also be many other altcoins, then Bitcoin's value might only end up between $ 2,000 and $ 200,000 in the case of extreme success — creating a lower «ceiling» on what the price can be and thus narrowing the range within which estimates of Bitcoin's value can take place.