At
an extreme enough point, you would be able to see the back of your own head.
Not exact matches
On that
point, to argue that low interest rates are
enough to make
extreme valuations irrelevant is to wholly miss the
point.
Will there ever be
extreme enough news that everyone will want out of the markets, to the
point where trading volume actually freezes?
For a long time, I believed that MMM was advocating
extreme frugality which he is kind
enough to break down is not the
point.
None of them are too unique to the
point where they'll receive the same reaction as Louis and pills or Francis and his
extreme dislike for everything, but the wit of some of them will be
enough to make you smile.
Given that impacts don't scale linearly — that's true both because of the statistics of normal distributions, which imply that (damaging)
extremes become much more frequent with small shifts in the mean, and because significant breakpoints such as melting
points for sea ice, wet - bulb temperatures too high for human survival, and heat tolerance for the most significant human food crops are all «in play» — the model forecasts using reasonable emissions inputs ought to be more than
enough for anyone using sensible risk analysis to know that we making very bad choices right now.
Once the ice reaches the equator, the equilibrium climate is significantly colder than what would initiate melting at the equator, but if CO2 from geologic emissions build up (they would, but very slowly — geochemical processes provide a negative feedback by changing atmospheric CO2 in response to climate changes, but this is generally very slow, and thus can not prevent faster changes from faster external forcings)
enough, it can initiate melting — what happens then is a runaway in the opposite direction (until the ice is completely gone — the
extreme warmth and CO2 amount at that
point, combined with left - over glacial debris available for chemical weathering, will draw CO2 out of the atmosphere, possibly allowing some ice to return).
Not only that, Curry goes past it, to, somewhat fantastically, conclude that «My assessment is that it is > 2/3 likely that there is such an
extreme end «coincidental» natural variability mimicking effect (just as laid out above) and then on to say — after limiting the range of possible natural variability («coincidentally»
enough) to only that which is close to this high «could» be (acc» to the IPCC) state of 50 %» natural» effect (that is, giving that itself only a 20 percent range in either direction (meaning, depending on interpretation, either a positive40 % or 30 % floor to the input of «natural» and a ceiling of 60 to 70 %)-RRB-, and thereby negating any possibility of the opposite — TO, again, the new mean representing the one directional and full extent of what, could plausibly be natural variability, and then concluding from there that «At this
point, I think anthropogenic is 50 % or less.»
If the plating out is
extreme enough, particulates will accumulate to the
point at which they become visible as discoloration.