Still, more than four dozen scientists, economists, engineers and entrepreneurs interviewed by The New York Times said that unless the search for abundant non-polluting energy sources and systems became far more aggressive, the world would probably
face dangerous warming and international strife as nations with growing energy demands compete for increasingly inadequate resources.
While world leaders — and this NCAR study — suggest prompt action can still avert the worst consequences, a majority of scientists polled at a major international conference last month told the paper they fear society is incapable of such action and
faces dangerous warming.
Not exact matches
Scientists have devoted considerable effort to understanding what magnitude of emissions reductions are necessary to limit
warming to this level, as the world
faces increasingly
dangerous climate change impacts with every degree of
warming (see Box 1).
In the
face of such inherent uncertainty, drawing «bright line» thresholds of «safe» versus «
dangerous»
warming has always been a fraught exercise, an effort to grasp for certainty in an uncertain world.
This prescient statement merits careful examination by those who continue to assert the fashionable belief, in the
face of strong empirical evidence to the contrary, that human CO2 emissions are going to cause
dangerous global
warming.
We
face such hard choices and limited policy options to avoid
dangerous warming in 2016 because we have squandered the 18 years since the Kyoto Accord.
We must retroactively shrink the amount of
warming facing us by redoubling efforts to remove existing greenhouse gases from the atmosphere and «sequester» them where they are no longer
dangerous.
Kentucky has
warm summers and mild winters, but residents still
face the threat of
dangerous summer storms that can produce hail damage.