Sentences with phrase «face skeptics in»

That's a winning formula for anyone, but it especially matters to entrepreneurs, who often face skeptics in their professional lives and need to know the people closest to them believe in them.

Not exact matches

«For anyone driven crazy by the faux warm and fuzzy PR of the so - called sharing economy Steven Hill's Raw Deal: How the «Uber Economy» and Runaway Capitalism Are Screwing American Workers should be required reading... Hill is an extremely well - informed skeptic who presents a satisfyingly blistering critique of high tech's disingenuous equating of sharing with profiteering... Hill includes two chapters listing potential solutions for the crises facing U.S. workers... Hill stresses the need for movement organizing to create a safety net strong enough to save the millions of workers currently being shafted in venture capital's brave new world.»

Just as the Roebling family faced widespread doubt when they started building the longest suspension bridge in the world in 1870, skeptics now question whether the Obama Administration will be able to restore the economy, Biden said.

The plan would rely on increased income taxes for the wealthy and faces skeptics who think such reform will not pass in an election year.

Meanwhile, in the face of powerful evidence against two of its strongest initial hypotheses — concerning MMR and thimerosal — the vaccine skeptic movement is morphing before our eyes.

For all of vanadium's promise, it still faces skeptics — including, surprisingly, some in the wind - power business who think the energy storage problem is not such a big deal.

Skeptics have countered, however, that these studies show only a correlation, but not proof, that activity in this area is essential for face recognition.

Professional debunker - on - television, the skeptic of the supernatural professor Phillip Goodman (Nyman) is faced with three cases that for once in his life he can't fathom, and each of them begins with a tendril, then a vital connection to his own history.

In the spirit of helping Ben and other reform skeptics stay focused on relevance, let's just take everything that Jackson et al. state at face value:

In the face of the skeptics and the scoffers, Michelangelo promoted a new conception of the artist, one in which the crass demands of commerce and the demeaning associations of manual labor have been sloughed off to reveal a creature as yet ill - defined but still thoroughly magnificenIn the face of the skeptics and the scoffers, Michelangelo promoted a new conception of the artist, one in which the crass demands of commerce and the demeaning associations of manual labor have been sloughed off to reveal a creature as yet ill - defined but still thoroughly magnificenin which the crass demands of commerce and the demeaning associations of manual labor have been sloughed off to reveal a creature as yet ill - defined but still thoroughly magnificent.

You will disagree, of course, but I still believe that it would be better tactics in the face of the meaningless but easily exploited decade of temperature flattening, to engage with the skeptics rather than to seek to dismiss out of hand with name - calling and the like.

The arc of Lynas's fascinating career is in some ways neatly encapsulated by two acts at Oxford — throwing a cream pie in the face of Bjorn Lomborg, the skeptic of eco-calamity, at a book signing there in 2001, yelling «pies for lies» (see photo below), and now echoing more than a few of Lomborg's assertions in his lecture at the Oxford Farming Conference on Thursday.

I was expecting fake skeptics to remain mostly silent in face of the ice massacre up north, but apparently they acutely sense how big this blow is to the remaining shred of their credibility, and so they upped the ante of misleading and distorting stupidity.

Until then, count me among the skeptics who consider this a political rather than scientific issue, especially in light of the fact that it is believed that the Antarctic and arctic shelves are breaking from stress (from «overgrowth»), not due to heat, since they are larger than they have been during recorded history, and that when the alarmists are proven conclusively to be wrong, they change the terminology («global cooling» to «global warming» to «global climate change» - face it, the global climate always has been and always will be very dynamic).

Climategate and the ongoing skeptic debates aside, I think the biggest problem facing the climate change movement is that there has essentially been a lull in global warming for the past ten years that to my knowledge no models predicted.

Nothing beats saved funds for robustness, and even the skeptics want robustness in the face of uncertainty as part of their no - regrets solution.

When I suggest we have a polar opposite situation here, enviro - activists appearing to be doing all the racketeering to keep their cause alive in the face of withering science - based criticism, this sort of thing is what I'm talking about — Newsweek «s Sharon Begley practically yelling about the need to stop skeptic climate scientists in their tracks, and less than three years later, Dr Schneider telling policy analysts and media experts at a major symposium exactly how such critics can be marginalized.

An article with a distorted quote from a climate report published in 2008 and with an alleged quote by Phil Jones in the third person about himself coming from second or third hand, a crowd of «skeptics» in the comment section, including you, who are taking all of this at face value without doing any fact checking and who see themselves confirmed in their preconceived views by this, and you are trying to sell this to me now as «common knowledge».

Viewed as the Prince of Darkness by climate - protection activists, Morano in his new book describes how he is in fact a real environmentalist and who, as almost every skeptic does, truly cares about the real environmental problems we face.

The message is going out that they will face political reprisals, including embarrassing and expensive persecution in the courts, if they ever give a dollar to a climate skeptic.

It's the two words that every global warmist (whether lying or deceived themselves) threw in the face of skeptics in an attempt to intimidate.

You «skeptics» have murdered dozens, compared scientists to Nazis, threatened to rape children and waved nooses in scientists» faces.

He was the guy who once threw a pie in skeptic Lomborg's face.

Skeptics also enjoyed watching the grieving faces of the mainstream media on CNN, MSNBC, NBC, ABC, CBS, as the Trump election night shock sunk in.

In my view what we are seeing is a concerted attempt by the «skeptics» to portray themselves as the voice of moderate opinion instead of the fringe group they actually are by trying to persuade people that the use of strong language to describe the risks we face is de facto an indication of an extreme (ist) opinion.

As for the rest of your comment insisting that the laws of thermodynamics are being broken... I'm a hardcore, in your face, let's debate any time anywhere anybody but only the direct science not the bunny rabbit population in northern Alberta has declined one percent so that's why there is more snow in Europe this year SKEPTIC.

The skeptics will argue that daily face - to - face contact in traditional offices is critical.

I was a bit of a Face ID skeptic when Apple introduced the feature in the iPhone X. «No fingerprint reader?