Sentences with phrase «face value because»

Mortgage life insurance insures a loan secured by real property and usually features a level premium amount for a declining policy face value because what is insured is the principal and interest outstanding on a mortgage that is constantly being reduced by mortgage payments.

The company would pay a large percentage of the face value because they expected to pay the premiums for only a year or two before collecting.

Similar games like Diablo III are also losing much of its face value because of its repetitiveness and lack of new content.

Bonds selling above face value because their interest payments are higher than prevailing interest rates.

Caution is warranted in taking Ayres's conclusions at face value because his primary research seems to have been performed sloppily.

The report suggests Trump adviser Stephen Schwarzman's recent reassurances on NAFTA should not be taken at face value because the softwood lumber dispute might unleash a round of tit - for - tat tariffs.

Most older bonds trade at a premium these days, which means they are priced above face value because their coupons are higher than those of newly issued bonds.

That might be true but we can't take that at face value because of the problems with the survey.

It is so easy to accept anything said or reported at face value because it philosophically aligns with one's own beliefs.

Just accepting something at face value because you've heard it a few different times or even because a teacher or a professor says it is generally not the best way to acquire knowledge, so kudos to Melissa for asking that question and for getting some clarification.

Not exact matches

The company had faced a delisting warning in October by Nasdaq because its market value had fallen below $ 35 million.

Reflective thinking is always more or less troublesome because it involves overcoming the inertia that inclines one to accept suggestions at their face value; it involves willingness to endure a condition of mental unrest and disturbance.

But another way to read it is at face value: the reason investors value Amazon and Uber so highly is because they believe these platforms will, eventually, generate huge returns.

I do worry about # 4, # 5, # 6, and # 7 because most people in today's world are busy and will take what's published at face value without doing some basic due diligence themselves.

Given the off - the - cliff behavior of the economy in late September and October, the November and December «improvements» in the ISM surveys are difficult to take at face value, especially because many of these readings remain below 50, indicating continued overall deterioration in conditions.

Don't take current earnings at face value, because profit margins are not permanent.

Another behavior is anchoring, where investors are slow to react to fundamental changes in economic, corporate or market developments because of an irrational attachment to a perceived value, even in the face of changing information.

While at the face of it, the value seems mind boggling but it doesn't come as a surprise because globally, e-commerce has been witnessing staggering growth, propelled by the sprouting of various e-commerce startups across the world....

It does not matter the context the quran was written in, because mentality disturbed Muslims take its hateful passages against Jews and Christians at face value.

You are a fool to believe anything at face value, even bigger fool to believe it because you were told to believe from the start of your life.

Last time I proffered the idea that pain is a problem for the atheist because he has to figure out what to do about said pain - and some of you took that at face value, but I think some of you are rightfully scratching your heads.

Thus we support a reduction in the speed limit because it will «save 7,466 lives every year,» though we would not do so if we recognized that such a law merely reduces the probability that an individual will die in a car accident from.0005 to.0004, a benefit too trivial to be noticed and, for any individual faced with the choice, far below the value of the additional driving time it entails.

An «explanation» of religion need not be ruled out just because it does not take religion at face value or keep to the first - order utterances of the believer.

And then how ridiculous it is because it can not be taken at face value.

Keep in mind that my hermeneutic in school was to take Scripture as much at face value as necessary, because I expected that God had a message to communicate to me and I wanted to hear it.

Always question authority people... check the facts... do not accept them for face value just because they are in leadership.

- No one takes evolution at face value or because Darwin said so.

Because this is so very easily refutable one can regard such attempts as nothing more than pure propaganda aimed at a believing audience use to accepting things at face value.

I was genuinely interested in hearing what you had to say because, at face value, your post does not appear to accommodate our freedom to choose.

24:36 & Mark 13:32 weren't difficult for Camping to ignore because he altogether rejects any sort of normal, face - value reading of Scripture.

He isn't questioning the faith or salvation of his audience because of the absence of works; rather he is questioning the absence of works «given'their faith and salvation taken at face value.

It is because you are a kool - aid drinker that takes the Lefts propaganda at face value.

Failure shouldn't necessarily be blamed on transfers.It's part of the reason but is not the only reasons.Other clubs which can't even buy like Arsenal have won very good trophies.Even at those times we were in debt we had a good team capable of winning the EPL or winng some of the smaller trophies.But we just went on trophyless.Now we are almost debt free and we are promised glory but honestly we don't even have the hope of glory.The only thing that can save us is renewal of the mind of the manager and board.That will bring a positive change.It's only insanity to keep doing the same thing and expect different results.We have a lot to prove out there to the world because the greatness of Arsenal has really gone down in the face of the world.They only see us as a team with good football that's all.The world doubts us and we have a point to prove.The values of a club is as important as winning trophies.If not Arsenal wouldn't have been this top club that people talk about everyday were it fpr only values or trophies.They go hand in hand.However, to the world trophies are very important and that fact can not be hidden.

That's why I put extra value on a guy who can, in fact, turn the corner consistently, because I know if they can develop a good inside move to go along with it, the offensive tackles they face are going to be sitting ducks more often than not.

I know CR7 is a far more important player to them than Santi is to us, but finding his replacement would be a very difficult task, I just don't understand the need for us to complicate our transfer window because we're getting # 5 - 10m extra than his face value (according to you anyway).

players like Ozil always present the fans with a bit of a conundrum, especially when times are tough... if you look around the sporting world every once in awhile there emerges a player with incredible skill, like Ozil, Matt Sundin or even Jay Cutler, who have a different way about themselves... their movement seemed almost too lackadaisical, so much so that it seemed to suggest indifference or even disinterest on the part of the player... their posture always appears somewhat mopey and they generally have an unflattering «sour puss» expression on their face... for some their above average skills are enough to keep them squarely in the mix, as their respective teams try desperately to find a way to get the best out of them visa vie player acquisitions or the reworking of tactics... when things go according to planned the fans usually find a way to accept their unique disposition, whereas when things go awry they become easy targets for fans and pundits alike... in the case of Ozil and Sundin, their successes on the international stage and / or with their former teams led many to conclude that if we surrounded such talented individuals with players that have those skills that would most likely bring the best of these players success would surely follow... unfortunately both the Maple Leafs and our club chose to adopt half - measures, as each were being run by corporations who valued profitability over providing the best possible product on the field... for them, they cared more about shirt sales and season tickets than doing whatever was necessary... this isn't, by any stretch, an attempt to absolve Ozil of any responsibility for his failures on the pitch... there is no doubt oftentimes his efforts were underwhelming, to say the least, but this club has been inept when it comes to providing this prolific passer with the kind of players necessary for him to flourish... with our poor man's version of Benzema up front, the headless chickens in Walcott, the younger Ox and Welbeck occupying wide positions far too often and the fact that Carzola, who provided Ozil with great service and more freedom to roam, was never truly replaced, the only real skilled outlet on the pitch was Sanchez... remember to be considered a world - class set - up man goals need to be scored and for much of his time here he has been surrounded by some incredibly inept finishers... in the end, I'm not sure how long he will be in North London, recent sentiments and his present contract situation seem to suggest that he will depart at season's end, but how tragic would it be if once again we didn't put our best foot forward and failed to make those moves that could have brought championship football back to our once beloved club... so when you think about this uniquely skilled player don't be so quick to shift all the blame on his shoulders because he will not be the first or the last highly skilled player to find disappointment at the Emirates if we don't rid the club of those individuals that are truly to blame for our current woes

which is certainly not a slight on the young french national player; like him or not, Sanchez has provided some real world - class performances for club and country in recent years... if you do this move, you need to really clean house or face some serious consequences for the foreseeable future... half measures are rarely rewarded, that's how we got here... tear down the wall... we need to get rid of Giroud, not because he isn't a talented player, his skill - set simply doesn't make sense if we hope to maximize the offensive potential of a quick passing, one - touch scheme... we need to evolve, like Barcelona, who realized you needed to have clinical finishers or face a mind - numbing future of horizontal passes and largely ineffective crosses... Barca went and got Suarez, even though they had Messi and Neymar on the roster (just imagine the possibilities — another in the litany of Wenger «what ifs»)... we need to be as clinical in the boardroom as on the pitch... accept nothing less or move on... personally I would move on from Welbeck, Giroud and Walcott, even Ox if he isn't all in... I think the most intriguing player might be Perez, which runs counter to the thoughts in my head when he arrived late last summer... we need a deep lying DM with quick feet and long ball potential, midfielders who can counter quickly even when they are spread out and 4 or 5 players who know how to attack the lanes (kind of a cross between Barca, Dortmund and Monaco)... this is seriously an achievable goal, one that logically should have been achieved quite a few years ago... did no one in the Arsenal organization see the financial restructuring of the football universe... think of the players we could have had but we weren't willing to cough up the dough only for those individuals to have their value double or triple within a 12 to 24 month period... even if just from an investment perspective these «no deals» represent a failure of monumental proportions... only if you cared, of course

It makes watching MotoGP refreshing because you don't have to have half an eye on race strategy, you can just watch and enjoy the racing at face value.

We're a little concerned that he's projecting more onto this experience than what the face value of it is, which is sad, because now we wonder whether his mom ever breastfed him, and maybe that's why he's emotionally attached to his ex after her lactating culinary feats.

Even if we take this study's findings at face value, 15 additional babies out of every 100,000 will die of SIDS because of bedsharing.

You hear pundits talk about the general election «pivot» because of this, and why I'm not sure you can really take anything anyone says at face value during a primary election anyway.

And they do so because, when the world demands leadership, it is this alliance of values and interests — this Special Relationship between two countries — that, to borrow the words of another great American statesman, enters the arena, with our faces marred by dust and sweat and blood, to strive valiantly and know the triumph of high achievement.

Environmentalists and lake experts say that without quick action to address the rapidly declining lake conditions because of invasive weeds and algae, the county could likely face a potential property value crash and a devastating loss of summertime tourism.

He suggested trade unionists were facing a return to the attacks seen in the 1970s and 1980s because only the unions are capable of offering the «only real organised challenge in society to the values and views of our bankrupt establishment».

Our security co-operation is not just vital because our people face the same threats, but also because we share a deep, historic belief in the same values — the values of peace, democracy, human rights and the rule of law.

Bloomberg's Edwin Chen, who heads the correspondents» association, responded by e-mail: «Taken at face value, Robert's high - minded offer went nowhere and is unworkable because the press is not monolithic — thank goodness.

«Most consumers take mobile health app claims at face value, and think that because they're available through a trusted retailer like the iTunes Store, they must have been reviewed by the FDA, which isn't usually the case,» Cortez says.

And the outcomes «may alter the view of hybridization in animals as some form of mistake,» comments Loeske Kruuk of the University of Edinburgh, «because it is now clear that we can not take the consequences for fitness at face value.»

It's a head scratching scenario at face value, because while calories and the energy balance equation do ultimately matter for weight loss — as I've said ad nauseam on this blog — sometimes the «math» of that equation isn't so neatly expressible with basic arithmetic, ie, calories in < calories out, or the now eye - rolling verbal version, «eat less move more.»

THE LURE OF POLITICALLY CORRECT DIETS For some high - minded teenagers, anti-saturated fat dogma may dovetail rather conveniently with pro-vegetarian arguments, 12 particularly because the search for «meaningful moral standards, values and belief systems» is a critical developmental task during adolescence.13 (It should be noted that moralistic claims in favor of vegetarianism often prevent earnest vegetarian teens from coming face to face with underlying farming realities — including the fact that sustainable farming requires enriching soil with animal products such as bone meal and manure.12) Recognizing the fact that adolescent boys also can be preoccupied with physical concerns about weight or athletic prowess, it is perhaps not terribly surprising that a sizeable proportion of teenage boys appear to be persuaded by advice that vegetarianism is a «healthy» lifestyle.