In Anne Dodge's case, Falchuk immediately recalled how he had taken at
face value the statements of the patient at NIH who was secretly using laxatives.
First of all, we don't always take at
face value the statement of the person that they're uninsured — because it's rare — but occasionally a person will say they're uninsured when they really are.
Not exact matches
«Today's Summit will underline that we remain committed to defending our people and upholding our
values as liberal democracies in the
face of any threat, whether at home or abroad,» May said in a
statement Wednesday night.
In some cases, you might be able to redeem cash or points for a gift card with a
face value that does more good than a
statement credit or cash back.
I choose to take his
statement at
face -
value, and trust that he will take steps in this direction.
When the thief on the cross says, «Jesus, remember me when you come into your kingdom» (Luke 23:42), the moment is a decisive break with the
values of the other thief, and a definitive
statement of faith in the
face of death — not just his own, but Jesus» too.
Deniers, as both Lipstadt and Vidal - Naquet show, seem to have an endless supply of polemical tricks and dodges: they simply discount Jewish testimony out of hand as lie or fantasy; inculpatory testimony from the Nazis themselves is said to have been coerced by the triumphant Allies; documents confirming such testimony are said to be forgeries; Nazi
statements and memoranda about the Final Solution are taken at
face value if they are euphemistically phrased, but are interpreted as hyperbolic or figurative if they are blunt and explicit; photographs and films of executions are dismissed as fakes.
Although Whitehead did not deal with the question of regional inclusion, some of his cosmological
statements, taken at
face value, seem to imply it.
They readily take
statements like «love your neighbor as yourself» or «remember the poor» at
face value.
Such claims seem so fanciful to many people it's hard for them to take the
statements at
face value.
Why do these explanations always seem to come down to some nonsensical
statement that I'm just supposed to accept at
face value?
Taken at
face value, this
statement raises all kinds of questions: What is wrong with the Lord's auditory capacities?
Certainly the supermarkets, on the
face of it, appear in the context of the current debate to be making
statements that they recognise that their customers demand and
value the supply of fresh drinking milk.
You're holding a
statement at
face value and then pretending nothing around it changed...
Should we take Cameron's
statement at
face value?
«I am honored to celebrate North Country
values before a national audience, and to highlight the clear choice
facing the voters of the 21st District,» Stefanik said in a
statement.
«Previous attempts to model these changes in the atmosphere have accepted the plant fossil record at
face value,» Jennifer Morris from the University of Bristol, U.K., and co-lead author on the study, explained in a
statement.
... «Teachers are having to confront whether you take the public
statements at some sort of
face value, or... address their validity,» Levinson says.»
«In tackling the challenges we
face on school building, I have been determined to use the capital funding at my disposal to best effect, seeking
value for money and efficiency from every pound spent,» his
statement said.
Clearly, your reported
statement that «teachers» only account for 10 - 20 percent of the
value of student achievement is foolish on the
face of it.
But if we take their
statement at
face value, it unfortunately implies that the new iPad is damaging its own battery.
Some companies pull reports, some take your
statement of no prior claims at
face value.
But if not, then take that
statement at
face value and look to consolidate.
I still think there's more going on here than Square - Enix wants us to believe, but take their
statement at
face value for now.
Is Pitchford messing with us, or can we just take his
statement at
face value?
Ad Reinhardt's tongue in cheek
statement that he went «beyond Mondrian» is rarely taken at
face value.
IMO when someone hears or reads something about climate science they should be careful about taking things at
face value, consider that climate change science does have major regulatory / economic / environmental repercussions, realize that the source may be motivated by these potential repercussions, and look at the past behavior of the source (have they usually said accurate
statements?).
Since models don't predict exact temperatures and instead predict a range of temperatures, that
statement is, on it's
face, an example of ignorance; the future may not be certain but we will definitely end up somewhere in the range of predicted
values.
I'm very much the kind of person who wants to prove something for themselves rather than taking
statements at
face value.
A better question might be why anyone would accept Wagner's
statement at
face value.
If that's the case, how can I (or you, or anyone) take his future
statements at
face value?
George can make all the appeals to scientific, institutional authority he pleases — the IPCC, scientific academies, peer - reviewed journals — but it makes no difference to people who lack the confidence in those institutions necessary to take their
statements at
face value.
I can not vouch for Hansen's figures (and have not checked his study, itself) but have only accepted IPCC's
statement at
face value.
However, since Dr. Steig indicated that the code used is availabe on Tapio's site, I think the thing to do is take that
statement at
face value and assume that they used it «off - the - shelf».
Cox claims that the necessity of making «policy decisions» makes it imperative to take at
face value probabilistic
statements, which are not empirically - verified.
We can no longer take such
statements at
face value.
Especially disappointing is his tendency to take contrarians» speculations about climategate at
face value, even when their
statements are nonsensical or at odds with the known facts.
It would quite simply be wrong to assume that the public always takes
statements of opinion at
face value.
Students in New York Law School's Program in Law and Journalism look at legal stories in the mainstream news media, evaluate the reporting, and probe further, questioning facts and
statements in the coverage that someone who hasn't studied law might take at
face value.
The Chief did not question the veracity of the respondent's
statements about what he had observed; he took those
statements fully at
face value.
The Justice does not weigh the evidence at this point but takes the evidence contained in the sworn
statement at
face value, meaning the Justice assumes the truth and integrity of the information.
It probably isn't what the SCC says the law is, at least if we take Athey's
statements at
face value: even a minor role is sufficient so long as it is a necesary role (Athey, para. 41.2).
In addition to nonmedical policies with up to $ 100,000 in
face value, other policies requiring medical screenings, blood work, attending physician
statements, etc. may provide coverages in the millions.
Some companies pull reports, some take your
statement of no prior claims at
face value.
FellowShipoftheMinds and other disreputable web sites predictably took this
statement at
face value and ran with it without verifying whether it was true — and it's not.
Yet you are happy to take his
statement at
face value.
It's hard to take these
statements at
face value.
Also, I wouldn't interpret the recruiter's
statement as indicating they're actually waiting on another candidate; I'd take it at
face value.
In general, licensees should assume that all
statements in an advertisement will be taken at
face value and interpreted based on their plain meaning.