Sentences with phrase «face.the same concepts»

You've probably heard of AirBnB (another possible option to make some money), so how about the same concept but with cars?
The same concept applies to PR.
We believe these same concepts will continue their upward arcs and shape crowdfunding well into 2017.
This one is the same concept as «basically».
The Gear VR's closest competitor is Google's Cardboard software, which uses the same concept of using a smartphone as the VR headset's screen and processor.
Today, with Neen's help, I package the same concept into a contextual model called the Client Vision Pyramid.
Why not apply the same concept to air freight?
Now a U.K. startup is utilizing the same concept to offer actual physical rewards to players.
The same concept applies to other social networks, though Velasco isn't sold on how useful they are for startups.
He thought the same concept might be applied to labels.
«We believe the same concept can apply to yogurt.»
No not the genre, but I will not buy another book from Grant Cardone in fear of wasting my money on another book with the same concepts.
Having said that, I don't believe the Wal - Mart of today embraces the same concepts Sam envisioned for Wal - Mart's future.
The fund part of exchange - traded fund comes from the same concept behind a mutual fund; instead of buying shares of only one stock, you're actually buying shares in a pool of assets that include several different stocks.
You can use the same concept to...
In this video, Entrepreneur Network partners Jason Balin and Chris Haddon explain that the same concept applies to business and big ideas.
Or if you sell physical products, you likely sell them on the e-commerce giants such as Amazon and eBay — same concept really as you can sell virtually anything on them due to their size.
I was chatting with it on Twitter the other day with Jim O'Shaughnessy where, you know, this same concept where the media... Every investor looking at the S&P or the Dow, and there's a number.
And over time as I myself have grown over the past five years, the blog has also kind of shifted so while that ruthless prioritization is still a major theme, I now also talk a lot about how that same concept applies to the way the way that you spend your time and energy.
For instance, many of them consider both forex and binary trading to be the same concepts.
It's the same concept repeated over and over again.
An amateur astronomy group in Texas figured out how to flash a laser pointer (okay, it's way more tech - y than a basic laser pointer, but same concept) at the International Space Station.
Other faiths believe in burning candles or saying prayers in behalf of the dead — the Latter - day Saints believe in the same concept, but taken to the next level: that we really can open a portal to salvation for every human on earth, if they want it.
As such it would seem that you are either claiming Jesus doesn't support the Bible or you are being disingenuous by claiming that Jesus did not speak those words but did support the same concept.
2) you can «discard the word truth», but your appeal to evidence is simply appealing to the same concept.
You see, I don't think you and I have the same concept of freedom; therefore, what ever I answer you may well be unsatisfactory to you.
Of course, the formula that everyone uses is «Billions and billions of years» which is the same concept that Democrates use to fix things.
It is the same concept adopted by this «Pastor» of a lady trying to interpret the scriptures to suit her own intentions.
We have seen that the concept of «atom of time» requires that of instant — the very same concept which Whitehead always rejected as early as in 19.19 (PNK 2f, 6 - 8; SMW 54, 172).2 Both concepts — «atom of time» and «instant» — presuppose the notion of simple location in time which Whitehead denounced as the most dangerous fallacy (SMW 84f, 98, 132).3 His whole doctrine of prehensions is incompatible with the doctrine of external relations which the atomization of time implies.
The same concept has become a dominant element in the Gita's presentation of the lord.
It's the same concept in mind.
If you are using after all the same technologies, you can also use some of the same concepts and effectively take radically different points of view, while the conceptual instrument remains the same?
Its the same concept as bank tellers learn to spot counterfeit bills.
Could this same concept apply to teenage sexual behaviour?
This exact same concept can be found in the letters of Paul and John as well.
He is addressing William Lane Craig's view of Divine Command Theory and equating that to the same concept used by suicide bombers in Islam.
The first use of the phrase debar Yahweh, the Word of Yahweh, as an effecting instrumental entity appears in Gen. 15:1, 4, where, in all probability, the E material is first employed.5 This same concept of the debar Yahweh is more sharply expressed in the Balaam oracle of Num.
How can an Atheist claim the universe was not created without proof, while also requiring the Creationist to prove this same concept?
Also, just to add, with the example for ants and elephants... animals do not have the same concept of morality as humans do.
Think of the catholic priests, sort of the same concept.
Paul clearly states that we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities in high places; He is suppose to be setting a principal and he is in fact destroying the thing that God stand for, serving the flesh and the creation more than the creator who is blessed forever; Man will always have a battle between flesh and spirit; he is more flesh than spirit ever in his dress muscles and tight shirts; which has no place in the spirit;» dealing with matters of the holy ghost «he can speck it but he can «t live it; which is the trouble with a lot of modern day Christians; do as i say not as i do... old fashion parents had the same concept, its not just Eddie he got caught, he was just falling weak to the flesh and his own desires; only thing is, he is responsible for the souls of those under his leadership; He must answer and atone to God for those actions, you think for a moment we are being hard on him; God has a way of letting us know when we are wrong that lets us know we need to change.
It can not be said that this particular interpretation of the general Christian philosophical doctrine that all that exists whether material or spiritual, must be brought under the same concept of being and conceived as subject to the same metaphysical norms, is the interpretation favoured by all philosophical schools.
Elsewhere the Catechism highlights the inseparability (though they remain distinct) of the Son and Spirit in the work of salvation by using the same concept: «When the Father sends His Word, He always sends His Breath.»
Christians believe the same concepts as Jews only that Jesus is the fulfillment of the OT.
From God's perspective the same concept looks very different than it does from ours.
Same concept, marketed differently.
It is the same concept «act» we employ in both cases.
The same concept is implied by the modern physicist Wheeler when he asks rhetorically «Here is a man, so what must the universe be?»
Given that the basic description of God as a non-temporal actual entity found in Process 7, 40 and 93 appears again in Process 32, it is safe to conclude that this last text, with the exception of its last sentence where the primordial nature of God is mentioned, manifests the same concept of God as the three former texts.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z