Sentences with phrase «faced lie if»

IT is a bare - faced LIE if Mormons say that isnt true.

Not exact matches

The research for this one is less clear cut, but if you're facing a potentially tough negotiation or other situation where you need to keep your wits about you, spot lies, and counter manipulation, stony - faced determination is probably better than smiles.
I trained multiple fingers on it, so even if the phone was lying flat on a desk and not facing me face, my finger successfully unlocked the phone without me thinking about it...
If there is hope, it comes from knowing the enemy that lies within, so that, thus fortified, we can face the enemy without untrammelled by such emotions as greed or (later) fear» Frank Martin
Only if the heart forgives the one who betrayed the trust you gave, only when you turn and face and forgive the one who lied about you behind your back, only when you forgive the one who let you down and stood you up, forgive the one who shattered your reputation, shredded your trust, busted your dreams, broke your plans, and bruised your one boldly beating heart — only when your heart forgives — can your heart be forgiven — forgiven of being a lying, cheating, and thieving sinner, forgiven of what you thought you would never do, forgiven of what you don't what anyone to know that you have done.
If one is crossing the desert on a camel and a blinding sandstorm comes up, the thing to do is to dismount, lie face downward on the sand with his cloak over his head, and wait an hour, three hours, half a day, until the storm abates and he can go on his way as before.
All you christian regulars who have vehemently denied the big bang and called it a lie or a plot by atheists to persecute christians or an absolute impossibility... need to slap yourselves forcefully in the face if you are now trying to say that the big bang is a proof of your god's existence.
i don't mind if you are going to burn for eternity in hell, that is your decision, but i tire of your overly simplistic, bold faced stupid lies.
Why should any rational adult accept at face value a claim that if made about anything other than religion, would be scoffed at as a lie?
Seems to me that if they had been preaching a lie, then they would have speedily renounced their message when facing a cruel death.
Deniers, as both Lipstadt and Vidal - Naquet show, seem to have an endless supply of polemical tricks and dodges: they simply discount Jewish testimony out of hand as lie or fantasy; inculpatory testimony from the Nazis themselves is said to have been coerced by the triumphant Allies; documents confirming such testimony are said to be forgeries; Nazi statements and memoranda about the Final Solution are taken at face value if they are euphemistically phrased, but are interpreted as hyperbolic or figurative if they are blunt and explicit; photographs and films of executions are dismissed as fakes.
The answer lies deep in your heart, which you already know if you are willing to face it!
There are a thousand possible answers to such a question, but let's just face the music and jump to the hardest and most troublesome answer of all: If Jesus did not rise from the dead, probably most of Christianity is a lie.
Typical tabloid ploy of evangelicals... make disparaging untruthful a.k.a.bold - faced lie today, submit apology / retraction later when it suits, particularly if personal finances are threatened.
Collin Sexton was lying face down under the beating afternoon sun in suburban Atlanta when George Washington wondered if he had finally pushed his best player too far.
It's difficult to blame Ozil for the difficulties he's faced at Arsenal without looking at the big picture... like the fans, he too was lied to by Wenger... there is no doubt in my mind that he was told by Wenger that he was trying desperately to recreate our earlier success by acquiring players that fit the system he ran when Henry was in his prime... as we know this hasn't happened... in order for Ozl to flourish he needs some speed up front, forwards that can make intelligent runs, a boss in the midfield to compensate for his obvious defensive liabilities and defenders who can transition from defence to offence quickly and efficiently... much like he had in Real and with the German National squad... unfortunately he ended up on a squad that has a striker who plays with his back to goal, very few intelligent runs into the box, minus Sanchez, no one to take pressure off him in the midfield, once Cazorla was injured, average defensive midfielders around him, which simply highlighted his lacking defensive qualities and defenders who lack the necessary cutting edge when it comes to transitional passing... instead of blaming Ozil, which is simply too easy, especially considering his mopey disposition, we should be asking ownership and / or Wenger why they brought him in if they didn't intend on doing what was necessary to get the best from him... can you imagine Ozil playing with the likes of Henry, Viera, Petit and Pires, it would be incredibly to watch and even more difficult to stop... so the only thing different between his experiences in Real and with the German team versus his time at Arsenal are the players around him and we all know who is in charge of making those decisions, the Grinch who stole soccer
I await the next stupid AOB post / article, I do wonder if any of you lot can think for yourself at times, Wenger is just the face of the problem, the real problem lies with the targets and ambition from the board.
You can buy these lies if you want but last I checked: drinking water won't stop you from turning redder than a Pop - Tart in a lukewarm toaster, my momma ain't letting me wear Uggs to a wedding or ever, and this isn't Space Jam, water isn't some magical - ass steroid that'll allow you to throw touchdowns, win five Super Bowls and try to be nonchalant in the face of questions about a white supremacist president.
For example: the counselor may be trying to prepare the victim for what lies ahead and what she will face if she files a police complaint, especially having already waited a week.
If the tour isn't careful, soon the statement will sound like a bald - faced lie.
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
If I ever saw myself saying I'm excited going to Cleveland, I'd punch myself in the face because I'm lying
If I do, will my shot hit the severe face that lies below thegreen?
which is certainly not a slight on the young french national player; like him or not, Sanchez has provided some real world - class performances for club and country in recent years... if you do this move, you need to really clean house or face some serious consequences for the foreseeable future... half measures are rarely rewarded, that's how we got here... tear down the wall... we need to get rid of Giroud, not because he isn't a talented player, his skill - set simply doesn't make sense if we hope to maximize the offensive potential of a quick passing, one - touch scheme... we need to evolve, like Barcelona, who realized you needed to have clinical finishers or face a mind - numbing future of horizontal passes and largely ineffective crosses... Barca went and got Suarez, even though they had Messi and Neymar on the roster (just imagine the possibilities — another in the litany of Wenger «what ifs»)... we need to be as clinical in the boardroom as on the pitch... accept nothing less or move on... personally I would move on from Welbeck, Giroud and Walcott, even Ox if he isn't all in... I think the most intriguing player might be Perez, which runs counter to the thoughts in my head when he arrived late last summer... we need a deep lying DM with quick feet and long ball potential, midfielders who can counter quickly even when they are spread out and 4 or 5 players who know how to attack the lanes (kind of a cross between Barca, Dortmund and Monaco)... this is seriously an achievable goal, one that logically should have been achieved quite a few years ago... did no one in the Arsenal organization see the financial restructuring of the football universe... think of the players we could have had but we weren't willing to cough up the dough only for those individuals to have their value double or triple within a 12 to 24 month period... even if just from an investment perspective these «no deals» represent a failure of monumental proportions... only if you cared, of course
If anyone is silly enough to take anything that Wenger says at face value then you have been in a coma for the better part of 10 years or simply a season ticket holder that gladly renews each year in May when the talking heads from corporate Arsenal start their usual blather about the transfer market and the inevitable success that lies ahead... stop talking Wenger and start doing the very things you and the rest of the suits keep spewing each and every year... just imagine how amazing this squad would be if we even did half the things that Gazidis claimed we would or if Wenger found a way to sign even a third of the players he said he could... that's exactly what Arsenal has become a «would have» «could have» clIf anyone is silly enough to take anything that Wenger says at face value then you have been in a coma for the better part of 10 years or simply a season ticket holder that gladly renews each year in May when the talking heads from corporate Arsenal start their usual blather about the transfer market and the inevitable success that lies ahead... stop talking Wenger and start doing the very things you and the rest of the suits keep spewing each and every year... just imagine how amazing this squad would be if we even did half the things that Gazidis claimed we would or if Wenger found a way to sign even a third of the players he said he could... that's exactly what Arsenal has become a «would have» «could have» clif we even did half the things that Gazidis claimed we would or if Wenger found a way to sign even a third of the players he said he could... that's exactly what Arsenal has become a «would have» «could have» clif Wenger found a way to sign even a third of the players he said he could... that's exactly what Arsenal has become a «would have» «could have» club
Absolute joke with the sale of ox and Gibbs we have made money gazidis wenger lied to are faces again we have some extremely wealthy men at are club and Stan is on about spending 3 billion on the rams for a new ground if any one still backs these muppets it's time for u to get out of are club with them if it means I have to take a banner every week to get these idiots out that's what I'll do bring back David dean please
If the baby lies in the occiput posterior presentation (where he is facing the mother's abdomen) it means that the harder part of the baby's skull may rest on the lower part of mom's spine (the tailbone) causing pain.
If using the cradle hold, cross cradle / transitional hold, or lying side - by - side, the baby should be facing you so that he does not have to turn his head.
They can cover your baby's face — even if she is lying on her back.
To be fair, I would be lying if I claimed that I wash my face EVERY night before bed, but I promise I do wash my face every morning!
If his swaddled and lying face - down, there's a chance that he could smother himself.
You may find nursing more comfortable if you and your newborn lie on your sides facing each other.
What to do: While your baby is lying on her back, hold the toy in front of her face and, if needed, wiggle it slowly or gently touch her with it to get her attention.
If you say it isn't true, you're either playing coy or flat - out lying to save face from being considered vain.
Even when you are sure your baby is lying on her back when going to sleep, it is also important to avoid placing her on soft, porous surfaces such as pillows, quilts, comforters, sheepskins, or bean bags — even soft materials used for stuffed toys — which may block her airway if she burrows her face in them.
It has been said [by me] that if I hear another Portlander ask me if I've read «Lies My Teacher Told Me» in response to hearing that I'm a teacher, that'd I'd smack said Portlander in the face [possibly literally].
If the baby sleeps on the stomach i.e., in the prone position, he may be lying with his face very close to the sheets and keeps breathing the same air.
Never feels bad for what he's done wrong, will say things like «look the other way» when he wants to take something or lie straight to my face even if the evidence is in my hand (crazy lying).
He added that if it is revealed that the Minister lied to parliament he must be made to face the consequences.
Tube workers facing the prospect of hundreds of job cuts will not take this lying down and Londoners can expect months if not years of strikes and disruption as these proposals are fought.
«I also saw it as an opportunity to raise the profile of women in science, to increase the diversity of voices and perspectives that make up the «face» of science — my hope is that all young people have the opportunity to see themselves as scientists, to consider science as a career and pursue it if that's where their passions and skills lie
If I couldn't make it out in time, I would have swept my face with my hand and laughed about having just read something sad, but I would have disliked that lie because it would have made me seem like an overly emotional female.
They can lie to your face if they want to get something they want and won't even feel guilty about it.
You risk looking a bit silly on the beach with a full face on, if you go in the water or sweat (if you are on the beach to lie in the sun then you will sweat) it will just end up looking a mess and be difficult to fix.
How it works If you experience tightness or soreness in your back, Prevention Magazine recommended lying face - up with the foam roller under your midback, parallel with your shoulders.
How to: Lie down on your belly with your palms facing down directly under your shoulders and your toes touching the floor as if you were going to do push ups.
If you'd like to try this pose, start by lying face down.
I'm not going to lie, if someone told me a year ago I'd be rocking this top and a leather skirt, I would have straight up laughed in their face.
But I'd be lying straight to your face if I said I didn't dabble in ankle boots every so often.
If you're lying about how you look, what's going to happen if / when you finally get to meet face - to - facIf you're lying about how you look, what's going to happen if / when you finally get to meet face - to - facif / when you finally get to meet face - to - face?
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z