The distinction between ex
facie contempt and in
facie contempt can be determinative, depending on the level of court the alleged ex
facie contempt allegedly attacks.
It can be a challenge to distinguish direct contempt and indirect contempt from ex
facie contempt and in
facie contempt.
If, as the appellant argues, s 192 (3) was intended to exclude all contempt powers, it would also remove the registrar's power to sanction for in
facie contempt.
[16] Read in this way, the effect of s 192 (3) is to limit the Registrar's power to sanction for ex
facie contempt so as to reserve to the superior court the power to imprison.
Not exact matches
Irrespective of what Articles 126 (2) and 19 (12) say, Articles 14 (1) right to liberty, 19 (1) right to fair trial and Article 19 (11) can not and should be truncated or abrogated in «ex
facie curiae»
contempt.
«Criminal
contempt for conduct ex
facie the court is generally initiated by the Attorney General while civil
contempt proceedings are initiated by a party or person affected by the order sought to be enforced.»
«
Contempt offences fall within two broad categories, viz., contempt in the face of the court (contempt in facie) and contempts committed outside the court (contempt ex
Contempt offences fall within two broad categories, viz.,
contempt in the face of the court (contempt in facie) and contempts committed outside the court (contempt ex
contempt in the face of the court (
contempt in facie) and contempts committed outside the court (contempt ex
contempt in
facie) and
contempts committed outside the court (
contempt ex
contempt ex
facie).
The majority at the Court of Appeal below conceded «either position is arguable», which was an acknowledgment that the Crown had not shown a strong prima
facie case of criminal
contempt.