Not exact matches
Today, by a 5 - 3 vote, the Supreme Court decided Stoneridge Investment Partners v. Scientific Atlanta, rejecting the concept of «scheme liability» that would have allowed
shareholders to sue third party advisers who may have
facilitated the fraudulent
transactions.
The most prurient aspect of the dispute concerned the allegations by CanniMed's special committee that the locked - up
shareholders had been heavily involved with Aurora and others in orchestrating and
facilitating the Aurora bid, such that the locked - up holders should be considered «joint actors» (this characterization would have significant disclosure implications and make the bid more difficult by excluding those shares from the 50 - per - cent minimum tender condition and from any minority approval of a subsequent acquisition
transaction).
Through utilizing corporate law, corporations can determine how best to protect the interests of their
shareholders and
facilitate commercial
transactions with customers and lenders.
While the press release contained only high level details, the 28 page Statement of Claim provides a very detailed account of the background leading up to the proposed CanniMed — Newstrike
transaction and how certain CanniMed
shareholders and Directors allegedly breached confidentiality and fiduciary duties and «hijacked» the board's process in order to kill the CanniMed — Newstrike deal and
facilitate Aurora's bid to acquire CanniMed.