Sentences with phrase «facing judicial review»

Our team regularly supports clients facing judicial review of planning decisions and appeals.

The Ministry of Defence is facing a Judicial Review over the framework of support it provides to service personnel...

The Ministry of Defence is facing a Judicial Review over the framework of support it provides to service personnel facing judicial process.

Looking across the majority of a Department's activities, Ministers face judicial review very regularly indeed.

The government is being warned that it will face judicial review proceedings in June unless it scraps a clause in the data protection bill that would prevent immigrants from accessing their Home Office records.

Not exact matches

April 14 — London Mayor Boris Johnson (pictured) has been urged to get involved to end the row over the future of the Olympic Stadium which is facing the prospect of being at the centre of a lengthy legal battle after Tottenham Hotspur launched the first steps in demanding a judicial review.

Watchdog faces possible judicial review over decision to close investigation into # 625,000 for digital marketing firm

The Department for Education (DfE) is facing a landmark judicial review after claims that one of its regional schools commissioners (RSCs) granted approval for a new sixth form that flouted the government's own guidelines.

After a two day BC Supreme Court hearing facing counsel for two government entities and Canada's largest union, the judgment was as much in my favour as one could expect from a judicial review.

At Moore Blatch we have specialist and dedicated education and public law teams who can advise you on the merits of a judicial review if your child is facing a budget cut.

The Model Penal Code: Sentencing project provides guidance on some of the most important issues that courts, corrections systems, and policymakers are facing today, including the general purposes of the sentencing system; rules governing sentence severity — including sentences of incarceration, community supervision, and economic penalties; the elimination of mandatory minimum penalties; mechanisms for combating racial and ethnic disparities in punishment; instruments of prison population control; victims» rights in the sentencing process; the sentencing of juvenile offenders in adult courts; the creation of judicial powers to review many collateral consequences of conviction; and many issues having to do with judicial sentencing discretion, sentencing commissions, sentencing guidelines, and appellate sentence review.

We have many years of experience in judicial review proceedings against the FCA, and have represented many clients facing winding up and injunction proceedings in the High Court, as well as prosecution.

The 2015 duty provider tender and the Lord Chancellor's policy for dual contracting was abandoned on 28 January 2016 in the face of opposition including a judicial review and 115 Part 7 claims (Jason Coppel QC, Amy Rogers, and Zoe Gannon acting for the Claimant solicitors).

And because that interpretation has not been shown to be an unreasonable one, there is no basis for us to interfere on judicial review — even in the face of a competing reasonable interpretation.

These days the remedies for people who feel that the Home Office has misapplied the law or failed to properly assess their case are far more limited; basically a right to a second pair of Home Office eyes reviewing their application followed by an application for judicial review if their pockets are sufficiently deep to finance their own legal team and face the significant costs that may be sought by government lawyers if their claim fails.

The Court of Appeal also addressed the issue of whether a privative clause that on its face purports to insulate all aspects of an administrative decision from judicial review does, in fact, oust the jurisdiction of the court.

It rather focused on the most immediate issue faced by the Court in this particular case: which is the intensity of the judicial review that can be exercised upon the choice of the EU legislator when conferring powers on the Commission?

Defence counsel for Groia faced the difficulty at the tribunal level of a hearing panel ruling that reasons given in judicial review proceedings during the criminal trial could not be re-litigated.

In its own year - in - review document, the CAS observed that «the announced funding addresses the security requirements of the Courts and CAS but other critical areas such as IT, judicial support systems and registry capacity still face serious program integrity issues.»

On their face, however, they do raise three issues that seem prima facie of concern: 1) the legitimacy of having rulings by the Federal Court about its process without any submissions made on the Committee's behalf; 2) the legitimacy of the Federal Court reviewing the Committee's conduct on an interlocutory basis; and 3) the legitimacy of the Federal Court intervening in a process designed to respect judicial independence, and to provide a mechanism for implementing s. 99 of the Constitution.

Professor Daly, in a 2014 paper, has neatly summarized the possible view of a party faced with the tribunal expanding its reasons on judicial review by making explicit what was previously implicit:

It simply isn't the case that «a would - be transferee such as Omar has possessed no right to judicial review of conditions the transferee might face in another country.»

the Bill should provide on its face that that there was a right of appeal to the Upper Tribunal against decisions to impose and to refuse trade defence remedies, and that such appeals should be «on the merits» rather than just by way of judicial review.

As LeBel J. noted in Multani, when a court is faced with reviewing an administrative decision that implicates Charter rights, «[t] he issue becomes one of proportionality» (para. 155), and calls for integrating the spirit of s. 1 into judicial review.

Court of Queen's Bench Justice Paulette Garnett, who was the subject of a judicial intervention last year to speed up her work, continues to miss deadlines by wide margins and is now facing a formal review.

The Court ruled that property owners facing an EPA compliance order under the Clean Water Act (CWA) can seek judicial review before being forced to comply.