Contact us to learn more about how our international language services can ease the burdens and overcome the challenges
facing plaintiffs in these cases.
Not exact matches
Kobe Bryant was given a standing ovation despite
facing a sex - assault charge
in 2003 (which was dropped after the accuser refused to testify — a civil
case was later settled out of court with Bryant apologising to the
plaintiff without admitting guilt).
As one of seven couples involved
in the
case — and the lead
plaintiff — the Goodridges became the public
faces of the marriage equality movement.
One
in - house counsel at a large company poignantly noted about about the
plaintiffs» counsel they
face, «they have a swagger and body language that comes from experience, and that experience comes off as confidence, and confidence helps win
cases.»
But the
plaintiffs in Flint may
face an uphill battle
in a civil rights
case, according to Peter Hsiao, an environmental lawyer with Morrison & Foerster
in Los Angeles.
In personal injury
cases, a
plaintiff must demonstrate that the defendant is liable by proving that a reasonable and responsible person would have behaved differently than the defendant if
faced with the same scenario.
In other words, the plaintiff in an insurance bad faith case may be able to recover an amount that is much larger than the original face value of the polic
In other words, the
plaintiff in an insurance bad faith case may be able to recover an amount that is much larger than the original face value of the polic
in an insurance bad faith
case may be able to recover an amount that is much larger than the original
face value of the policy.
If, instead of bringing counterclaims
in the original lawsuit, the defendant brings a separate lawsuit against the
plaintiff, the
plaintiff could seek to either (1) consolidate the
cases if they are filed
in the same court system (i.e. a federal
case and a federal
case, or a New York State
case and a New York State
case), or (2) move to dismiss the new lawsuit because the claims were required to be brought
in the original lawsuit as mandatory counterclaims, or (3) move to stay proceedings
in the second lawsuit pending resolution of the first lawsuit, or (4) move to dismiss the claims
in the second lawsuit on the merits if it is apparent from the
face of the countersuit that it does not state a claim upon which relief can be granted or was filed
in the wrong court.
Evidence that doesn't appear inside the «four corners» of the contract, such as comments made by the
plaintiff or defendant who are now
facing off
in a breach of contract
case, can not be considered if they contradict what is inside the contract's «four corners.»
Reading this reminded me of a 2005
case (Chow v. Hiscock) where the Court expressly recognized the injustice of dry judgement
facing a
plaintiff left «
in a permanent semi-vegatative state» following a «brutal, unprovoked assault ``.
The
plaintiffs would have not only needed to have overcome these rulings but were
faced with hard - hitting summary judgment motions that could have resulted
in dismissal of the entire
case.
is, on its
face, applicable to every action where the
plaintiff has been involved
in successive incidents, where it is not the
case that negligence
in the successive incidents were cumulatively necessary causes of at least some of the injury and damages?
The executive summary from an article Law Library of Congress «Medical Malpractice Liability: Canada» sets out the often difficult task
Plaintiff's
face in getting justice
in these heartbreaking medical malpractice
cases: