Sentences with phrase «fact be in error»

Their scientific judgement may in fact be in error.

A good article but one of your facts is in error.

Not exact matches

If your misstep was the result of an error in analysis or a failure to learn relevant facts, then this is indeed the right course of action.

In Facebook's case, the issue is complicated by the fact that the social network has repeatedly had to admit errors in its audience - measurement analytics, including over-estimating video views for more than two yearIn Facebook's case, the issue is complicated by the fact that the social network has repeatedly had to admit errors in its audience - measurement analytics, including over-estimating video views for more than two yearin its audience - measurement analytics, including over-estimating video views for more than two years.

In fact, persistence and strong trial - and - error can be even more important than business know - how.

In fact the NY Fed manufacturing figure was so bad, many initially thought it was an error.

No doubt many of you sharp - eyed readers will have spotted a spelling error, thinking I intended to refer to one of these: But, in fact, I really did have in mind something more like this: We are following an example from the recently published Mathematica Beyond Mathematics by Jose Sanchez Leon, an up - to - date text that...

However eventually through trial and error and accident (IF you cared enough to investigate and IF you were open to learning and thus challenging your previous understanding) you'd come to see that oranges and baseballs, while similar in some ways, are fundamentally different in others, until you could with confidence state that they are in fact not the same.

In fact some of the evidence you didn't mention which was popular fodder in the past has already been proven incorrect (horses in the americas before the spanish, and the BofM reference to elephants) Both considered ridiculous errors by Joseph Smith until elephants appeared on ancient Mayan / Incan temples and horses from the Brea tar pits were dated before the spanisIn fact some of the evidence you didn't mention which was popular fodder in the past has already been proven incorrect (horses in the americas before the spanish, and the BofM reference to elephants) Both considered ridiculous errors by Joseph Smith until elephants appeared on ancient Mayan / Incan temples and horses from the Brea tar pits were dated before the spanisin the past has already been proven incorrect (horses in the americas before the spanish, and the BofM reference to elephants) Both considered ridiculous errors by Joseph Smith until elephants appeared on ancient Mayan / Incan temples and horses from the Brea tar pits were dated before the spanisin the americas before the spanish, and the BofM reference to elephants) Both considered ridiculous errors by Joseph Smith until elephants appeared on ancient Mayan / Incan temples and horses from the Brea tar pits were dated before the spanish.

Own up to the fact that there are difficulties in Scripture, maybe even some errors, but with some careful thought and peaceful discussions, solutions can be found.)

In fact, an error in the data later came to light and, once this had been corrected (published in an erratum in a later issue of the Journal), it became clear that there was actually no significant change in teenage pregnancy rateIn fact, an error in the data later came to light and, once this had been corrected (published in an erratum in a later issue of the Journal), it became clear that there was actually no significant change in teenage pregnancy ratein the data later came to light and, once this had been corrected (published in an erratum in a later issue of the Journal), it became clear that there was actually no significant change in teenage pregnancy ratein an erratum in a later issue of the Journal), it became clear that there was actually no significant change in teenage pregnancy ratein a later issue of the Journal), it became clear that there was actually no significant change in teenage pregnancy ratein teenage pregnancy rates.

This is in fact a resurgence in other terms and with other objectives in view — of the error always committed by Christians who intervene in the sphere of human actions to justify them and to testify that in the end man has good reason for doing what he does.

The fact that they have been forced to acknowledge yet another error in their code, is simply more proof that they make it up as they go along to preserve thier power and income sources.

I shall argue that Whitehead did in fact badly misinterpret Aristotle's concept of substance, as Eslick claimed, and I shall suggest that, far from amounting to an inconsequential error in historical exegesis, this misconception was a strong influence in turning Whitehead's metaphysics in the direction of an epochal theory of becoming.

If the effects felt in CE do not m fact emanate from the region identified by PI, then a perceptual error has occurred.

which is in fact NOT an error at all..

Repeatedly he argued that the introduction of women priests, the new prayer book and other changes in the Episcopal Church had taken it out of the mainstream of Episcopalianism; that in fact the schismatic group, by separating itself from all that «error,» is the faithful remnant.

This is a desperate error, or rather a desperate mistake, which overlooks (yes, and what is worse, it overlooks the fact that what it overlooks is pretty nearly the best thing that can be said of a man, since far worse often occurs)-- it overlooks the fact that the majority of men do never really manage in their whole life to be more than they were in childhood and youth, namely, immediacy with the addition of a little dose of self - reflection.

Ironically, this would mean that, in fact, Whitehead is actually guilty of the error everyone associates with Bergson, while Bergson is a help to prevent the error, and what Whitehead left undone regarding «the commensurability of the two modes of analysis,» Bergson may have accomplished in creating a version of the calculus neither committed to strictly quantitative nor strictly qualitative notions of unity, a method to be used in metaphysics.

Your statement betrays the fact that your understanding of the nature of scripture (and corresponding sound hermeneutics) is in error.

Facts, or evidence, seem incontrovertible only in the light, or dark as the case may be, of human judgment, which is the only source of error on this planet.

In my experience, error is most severe in relation to fact judged incontrovertiblIn my experience, error is most severe in relation to fact judged incontrovertiblin relation to fact judged incontrovertible.

Judging before obtaining all facts invariably results in error, especially when malicious organizations and people are interested in having you embrace their position — just think of all the zealots killing each other.

The error arises from a wrong interpretation of the obvious fact that everybody wants to be a self, to have a sense of the value of his or her selfhood, and to realize, so far as may be, the potentialities given in that selfhood.

In the minds of men and in the Church, a revealed truth can be compatible with an error in secular matters, as can be seen from the very fact that the Church declares contrary theories in theology to be equally «safe», that is to say, without danger to RevelatioIn the minds of men and in the Church, a revealed truth can be compatible with an error in secular matters, as can be seen from the very fact that the Church declares contrary theories in theology to be equally «safe», that is to say, without danger to Revelatioin the Church, a revealed truth can be compatible with an error in secular matters, as can be seen from the very fact that the Church declares contrary theories in theology to be equally «safe», that is to say, without danger to Revelatioin secular matters, as can be seen from the very fact that the Church declares contrary theories in theology to be equally «safe», that is to say, without danger to Revelatioin theology to be equally «safe», that is to say, without danger to Revelation.

In fact, this is perhaps the most anti-modern encyclical since the Syllabus of Errors, Pius IX's haughty 1864 dismissal of the conceits of the modern era.

Skimpoles are incapable of gratitude toward authority because they can conceive of no error they need to be protected from; like spoiled children — precisely, in fact, like Damaged Young Men — they see all discipline as condemnatory and all condemnation as wicked.

In the words of Cardinal Pell in this issue, in the context of «the grave errors of this time», we need to ponder more deeply the fact that Christ is «the centre and fulfilment of what it means to be human»In the words of Cardinal Pell in this issue, in the context of «the grave errors of this time», we need to ponder more deeply the fact that Christ is «the centre and fulfilment of what it means to be human»in this issue, in the context of «the grave errors of this time», we need to ponder more deeply the fact that Christ is «the centre and fulfilment of what it means to be human»in the context of «the grave errors of this time», we need to ponder more deeply the fact that Christ is «the centre and fulfilment of what it means to be human».

It is only the pre-conceived heretical rejection of the deity of Christ that forces the Watchtower Society to inconsistently translate the Greek text, thus allowing their error to gain some semblance of legitimacy in the minds of those ignorant of the facts.

To give him credit, his theology sounded fairly orthodox at this point, with no sign of the doctrinal errors on the Trinity he's been accused of (he's previously preached that there are actually nine parts to the Trinity, as each person of the Godhead is in fact a trinity itself).

It is not possible to correct the countless errors in Berke's review of these two books in a letter, but one thing must be said: Holocaust revisionism would not have grown as it has over the last decade if not for the fact that our position can withstand the scrutiny of any fair - minded person.

In his first radio broadcast since his doomsday prediction failed to pan out in a spectacularly public fashion, the California preacher insisted his was an error of interpretation, not facIn his first radio broadcast since his doomsday prediction failed to pan out in a spectacularly public fashion, the California preacher insisted his was an error of interpretation, not facin a spectacularly public fashion, the California preacher insisted his was an error of interpretation, not fact.

But in fact, I would argue the opposite — this «belief in the supernatural» is actually a distraction from a religious life, and makes one prone to many errors, theologically - speaking.

Unless of course you believe in a God call «Man» who you feel can never be in error present facts when you accuse religion of being the most bloodiest wars.

To see it as a unified doctrine would in fact be as much an error as it would be to identify it with the teachings and ideas of a single thinker.

Obviously we can not share in these various Afro - Asiatic forms of religion nor can we remain indifferent to the fact that each of them, in its own way, should regard itself as being the equal of any other and should authorize its followers not to seek to discover whether God has revealed the perfect and definitive form, free from all error, in which he wishes to be known, loved, and served.

Is it enough to give believe stats given the margin of error and how did you verify they were in fact atheists BEFORE said wreck?

Clearly then it is neither necessary nor possible to interpret the former aspects of feelings as reducible to the latter under the present reading of Hartshorne; in fact, the converse error is closer to the truth, since the latter is simply the former's active availability to the future.

This is partly so that Jesus can continue to identify with us in our humanity, but also so that we are not deceived into thinking Jesus has already returned spiritually when in fact He has not (this was part of the error Paul tried to correct in the Thessalonian church).

The unspeakably tragic error, he insisted, was to think that Christianity is a subcategory of «religion,» when in fact Christ explodes from within history all human constructions of reality, religious or otherwise, thus illumining with the divine the world of which we are part.

But if he is in Error he must comprehend this fact in his thinking, and Recollection will not be able to help him further than to think just this, Whether he is to advance beyond this point the Moment must decide (although it was already active in giving him an insight into his Error).

This error remains intuitively plausible and has a decent cultural pedigree, so therefore those who make it should not be dismissed as utterly irrational or evil, even though they may seem so from the viewpoint of one who bears in mind the facts of human development.

But this doesn't mean that the parts which may not be true to actual fact are «in error,» are «false,» or are not true.

This error is, in fact induced by Biblical language that uses allegory and metaphor to draw shape to metaphysical realities.

And the «vague» papal pronouncement that Mr. Lowell seems to doubt was ever made was, in fact, a major — some think historic — allocution, delivered in 1953 to an audience of Italian jurists, in which Pope Pius XII laid down the principle that «in the interest of a higher and broader good, it is justifiable not to impede error by state laws and coercive measures.»

I would like to know more of the facts and motives involved before I decide whether the Church or the government is the one in error.

I know well whereof Peter Kreeft speaks, and in fact have a rather guilty conscience about purveying some of the errors of the Received Wisdom myself from time to time until my further reading informed me how deceived I (and my hapless students) had been.

But shouldn't critics of «the judicial usurpation of politics» take at least some comfort in the fact that the error was on the side of democracy, as it were?

For those not familiar with academic debates, the impression could be given that West's work contains serious errors, when, in fact, his books have received imprimaturs and the endorsement of trusted figures.

The fact Wilshere was played as a AM and Rambo as CM is what I would call a tactical error, the style of players they are, they was put in the wrong way around and it exposed their weaknesses.