Sentences with phrase «fact check anything»

With so much misinformation about credit, it's important to fact check anything you hear, even if it's from a seemingly trustworthy source.

Not exact matches

I didn't research until after the fact and should have waited one more day before doing anything, I would have seen that the check did not clear.

In fact, other than a slightly lactose intolerance (that I either keep in check by lactaid pills, or by avoiding dairy products) and the fact that I lack the alcohol dehydrogenases enzyme to break down booze, I'm fairly lucky that I can eat / drink most anything.

But I got lured in by the fact that this recipe called for non-standard ingredients like vanilla bean and coconut oil, and I already had both of them on hand; I've come a long way from the days when I had to check to see if I had baking powder before I made anything.

Typical K though, ignore the facts to spread depressing BS, get yourself checked out by a doctor, I seriously think you suffer from Depression and you are finding it hard to see anything good even if the good is their.

Most players today play for the money and that is a fact and most players today go online and believe their own hype and the hype that the online fans give them, they won't listen to the «haters» or the people that give them a reality check and in fact they block them too (as evident of me asking Walcott a few weeks back «why do you not do anything in most games?»

Dr. Greger and his website listed below are my go - to when fact checking absolutely anything!

See anything in there we should fact check?

Taken in what appears to be an analog photographer's darkroom, the shot doesn't really reveal anything we didn't already expect such as a front end that looks to be a somewhat more aggressive interpretation of the company's latest E-Class, LED daytime running lights modeled after a tilted check mark, and the fact that it comes in red.

As with anything you read on the internet, I'd strongly suggest doing a bit of fact - checking and coming to your own conclusions.

It's a choice between paying upfront for anything from an editor to fact - check your copy to paper stock and bookbinding — or taking an advance and ceding up to 85 percent of future the profits to the publisher, he says.

Why would anyone believe anything you have to say about publishing when you clearly don't check the «facts» you include in your stories?

Well, to be honest, I really can't think of anything other than the fact that they don't have physical branches and that they don't offer checking accounts.

You have to add your first authorized user, which common sense suggests would be you because they do not mention anything about a second member, but it may be worth checking on that fact if you go for the Chase Sapphire preferred credit card.

EVERYTHING is listed, but I haven't checked anything off yet (due to the fact that my Nookling's shop is closed at this time and thus, I can not check my catalog).

With all this hype, it might be useful to check the facts and see if we actually know anything about how humans may be meddling with Earth's atmosphere.

Surely indeed they could — in some theoretical world — but back in the real world Good Energy and companies like them that sell 100 % tariffs do not reinvest anything at all in new build — check the facts, in nine years or so of existence and promises to the contrary, GE have spent / reinvested nothing at all.

And if you find anything you believe should be reported that can be documented and fact checked, please consider leaving in the comment box below.

However, those solutions are in fact real and have been proven to provide the energy needed to power our economy, and, they, or at least fossil fuel technology, was developed largely without government assistance — there was no tax code available to to abuse when Rockefeller drilled his first well and built his first refinery, and the government of the mid to late 1800s was not writing checks to private industry for anything with the possible exception of defense related expenditures.

But when you pick up threads and only show them as proving no AGW and have not done anything like as much checking of those facts as you demand from the pro AGW proofs, you aren't being skeptical, you're denying AGW.

As with so many groups who oppose a wind farm or wind power, they seem little concerned with fact - checking and seem willing to repeat anything that places wind turbines in a bad light.

There is politics to this, but the policy - related / law answer has to do with the fact that, while a criminal background check would certainly make sure you've never been convicted of a crime, that would not do anything about folks who were trying to slip away not from the government, but from, say, a creditor to whom a person owed a lot of money.

Anything older requires you to pull out your phone to check; in fact, there's not even a count to say how many messages, calls, notifications, and the like you've got waiting.

In fact, you can check the battery status of anything connected via Bluetooth, including headphones and speakers.