Sentences with phrase «fact even those things»

Not exact matches

That's factoring in the snacks, breakfasts, coffee, and drinks I haven't had to pay for, but not including things like WiFi, comfort, or the fact that it's made it easier to finish up work from the airport when I'm catching early - evening flights on Fridays.

Even knowing simple things like the fact that a visitor clicked and read an article on home - mortgage options can help to personalize the content delivered to them across the site, mobile app and in - person experiences.

The fact of the matter is when you talk about central banks, you're talking about powerful institutions rooted in their own management styles and tradition (even if the latter has just now seen a very unusual break) and it's not likely that one person can radically change things, even if he or she wanted to.

For big projects with distant time horizons, the temptation to leave things for later can, in fact, get the best of even the least procrastination prone.

Making things even more complicated was the fact that, unbeknownst to my accountant, I was 10 weeks pregnant, and the father wasn't in the picture.

While the series highlights companies in three very different industries, Toyota has, in fact, worked with many companies in an even broader array of sectors, and in the aggregate they prove that when you open yourself to learn from the best, great things can happen.

Among other things, Hogan is claiming that Gawker violated the tort of «publication of private facts,» which prohibits people from publishing private facts about others, even if they are true, unless the facts are related to matters of «public concern.»

In fact, he even wrote a book of the same title: The Behavior Gap: Simple Ways to Stop Doing Dump Things With Money.

The only thing that might scare prospective (or even current) investors is the fact that the payout ratio is a sky - high 94.2 %.

Even more disconcerting is the fact that the relative strength of the XHB has remained below its falling 200 - day moving average in spite of the broader equity market recovery and the fact that the Fed has backed off its hawkish interest rate stance — two things that would normally translate into higher confidence for homebuilders.

In fact, it could even be argued that things are getting better.

Although some of the activities associated with the Dark web aren't entirely ethical or even legal, the fact that Litecoin is a preferred option there speaks positive things about it.

In fact, it is only accelerating, thanks to trillion - dollar developments like the Internet of Things and 5G wireless networking (those cell towers need an even faster backhaul to the regular internet, which is the fiber optics come in).

In fact, more than half of internet users (58 %) check their email first thing in the morning — before looking at Facebook, doing a Google search, or even checking the weather — and almost 9 out of 10 email users check their inbox at least once a day.

«This was qualitatively different from even the awful things that we've confronted in different parts of the region because of the targeted nature of it, the scale of it, the fact that this is a whole people,» the official said.

Unfortunately in my case, I've probably gone to excess the other way... after 43 years of being (in my view) threatened with hellfire for every cotton - picking thing (including the «sinfulness» of being born in the first place because it's a well - known scriptural fact that every human is born sinful and separated from G - d, with a heart that does nothing but desire evil and no way to please G - d even when righteous), threatened with being «left behind» in the rapture (should I fail on some doctrinal (belief) point at the crucial moment)... I refuse to consider ANY possibility of hell at all.

But one of the things this video left me with was the very real fact that even though the Vineyard has written him out of our history, he is a part of our foundational roots.

@fimilleur from time to time mankind experiences the presence of God, there have been and continue to be events that testify to the presence of Him.The multiple gods you continually point to have an unique difference from the God who first revealed His presence to ancient men i.e. the Hebrews.The particular gods you mention roman etc. are all man made and in many instances men themselves i.e. hercules, but even the ancient greeks realized the limitations of their understanding and included an «unknown» God in their worship structure.many cultures did likewise, having a glimpse of God but not the fullness of understanding that was given to the Jews.Whether or not «we» believe, does not alter the fact that God exists as an unique being, whether or not «we» acknowledge Him «we» will stand before Him.You do not choose to understand, but we are actually standing in His presence right now as He is much bigger than the doctrines and knowledge man ascribes to Him those things you find so questionable are the misconceptions and misrepresentations of God made by men throughout history.

In fact, some have even tried to avoid paying taxes — because some of their money might go to things with which they disagree.

The mere fact that you would say something like that shows that you A) have never even questioned your faith (which is a bad thing), and B) don't know a single atheist.

The simple fact that we have our major poltical players even mentioning the fact they are «religious» or practice a certain form of religion is a scary thing.

The fact that First Things published a long article on my book Mercy: The Essence of the Gospel and the Key to Christian Existence is an honor even when the article is a critique, which — as usual in academic disputes — needs critique from my side as well («What Mercy Is,» March).

You called me out as being disingenuous when I said «that as time goes on however, I'm finding things that are helping to disprove things previously held as fact among Christians», so I have provided you an example that not only wasn't it a disingenuous statement, but that I've done my homework, on both sides of the argument, and came up with something that no one has been able to give me a response with even either the slightest chance of being possible, or falling back to the old status qua of «mysterious ways» and «having faith».

Sometimes a situation that seems like it's devolved just into complete absurdity requires a radical, absurd response — and that radical, absurd response might in fact be more sensible than even the thing it's responding to.

Pascal's Wager is not the only reason to believe in God, and you are right, it isn't even a great reason if it is your core belief, but it is a really good reason to reevaluate your beliefs in light of the fact that there is a huge downside to believing certain things.

Often the fact that someone related by blood or marriage still cares is the only thing in life to which a patient clings — and this holds good even if he displays apparent indifference or antagonism to anyone and everyone.

Although I have my personal belief regarding these things here, as long as I can not offer watertight Scriptural evidence for my confidence, I can only copy and paste some verses which could point to the fact that God meets every human being twice or even three times during his lifetime in order to show him the way he should go and to bring him to repentance.

In other words, even if all the facts were wrong, the Bible could be a true and accurate account of those things about which it speaks.

Sadly, these attitudes and assumptions were retained even when in fact human actions began to have a large effect on other living things.

Before Jesus came (and in fact, even today) when Jewish people read their Hebrew Scriptures and saw a violent God doing violent things, they projected this onto their expectations for what the Messiah would be and do when He finally came.

Having grown up near Times Square, I have seen PLENTY of things that do in fact exist, that even I would be hard pressed to call natural!

For example, against both dualism and reductionistic determinism and in favor of the pancreationist, panexperientialist view that the actual world is made up exhaustively of partially self - determining, experiencing events, there is considerable evidence, such as the fact that a lack of complete determinism seems to hold even at the most elementary level of nature; that bacteria seem to make decisions based upon memory; that there appears to be no place to draw an absolute line between living and nonliving things, and between experiencing and nonexperiencing ones; and that physics shows nature to be most fundamentally a complex of events (not of enduring substances).

Lets we forget, there are many ultra smart folks who see the same «indisputable» facts that you see, but know that we can never be sure but can hope and even believe in unseen «things», in ways that help civilization.

Even in an opinion piece, you can see certain things are claimed as fact to support the opinion.

This is not a way of acknowledging the simple fact that we live among people as well as things, or that we choose our own associates, or even that much of the material world is now the product of human construction.

And even if the entire thing is 100 % real, the only FACT is that 500 years later things have changed.

MormonChristian (there is no such thing by the way): you ignore the facts: cult or not, NO ONE has ever proven anything about the Nephites and Lamanites and all investigation, even by the LDS church, has shown this to be the case.

You told me that even though I've never killed anyone, never stole a thing, never disrespected my parents, and did good things for people — the fact that I didn't get up and publicly state that I took JC into my heart, that I'd be going to hell.

Besides, in a rhetoric ruled by a logic, testimony even conceived as a relation of transpired facts, occupies necessarily an inferior place, for it shows the dependence of the judgment and of the judge with regard to something exterior: on the first level, the things spoken by another, and on the second, things seen by him.

One thing seems to be noteworthy: even the true freedom of choice, that is the freedom which consists not only in the absence of external compulsion but in the fact that man must freely decide about himself, and which is, therefore, a demand rather than «freedom» — this freedom becomes evident only in Christianity, because only there each individual is eternally valid (in the personal love between God and man) and hence must realize himself in perfect responsibility and thus in freedom.

But the problem is that after ten years, I'm getting tired of trying to convince fellow Christians that I am, in fact, a Christian, even though I may vote a little differently than they vote, interpret the Bible differently than they interpret it, engage with science a little differently than they engage with it, and understand sovereignty and choice a little differently than they understand those things.

Tim i found it liberating to just do what the Lord wants you to do i work within his boundarys and yes i attend church and enjoy it.I love the people and i love hearing the word and worshipping the Lord even if others are still bound up with traditions thats not my walk thats theres.My focus is to do what the Lord wants me to do.There have been times i have said no to the pastor he does nt understand why i choose not to lead the worship.i query him as well regarding the idea that its not just performing a function because there is a need our hearts have to be in the right place so that the Lord can use us but he did nt understand where i was coming from and thats okay because of that i just said no until my heart is right i am better not being involved in leading.But i am happy to be an encouragement to others in the worship team i havent wanted to be the leader i have done that in the past.So my focus has been just the singing and being part of different worship teams i think the Lord has other plans as the groups i am in seem to be changing at the same time i am aware that i do nt to worry about change as the Lord knows whats best.I used to be quite comfortable leading the music but that was before when i was operating in my own self confidence and pride.The Lord did such a huge change in my life that i lost my self confidence and that is not a bad thing at all as my spiritual growth has been incredible.The big change was my identity moved from me and what i could do to knowing who i was in Christ and that he is my strength and confidence.Now i know that without him i can do nothing in fact i am dependent on his empowerment through his holy spirit all the time in everything.In the weekend i was asked to lead the music at another church i attend multiple churchs although i attend two regularly one has services in the morning and one has services in the evening so the two do nt really clash.In the weekend i was asked to lead the music its been two years since i did that and i was worried on how i would go.All i can say is that it went really well and because i stepped out in Faith the Lord really blessed the morning to the congregation.The difference is knowing that i serve the Lord with the gifts he has given me but my heart has to be right and when i do it in his way it builds up the body and it brings glory to him.May the Lord continue to show you what he wants you to do even though others may not understand your reasons i just want you to know that you do nt have to pull away completely just work within the boundarys that the Lord gives you and do nt feel pressured by others expectations to do anything that feel uncomfortable.Be involved just as you feel lead by the holy spirit even if it is in a very minor way take small steps.regards brentnz

The fact that, if you ask for something repeatedly, over and over, year after year, sooner or later that thing is bound to happen anyway, has not even occurred to you.

The fact that Atheists indicate that spending time thinking about their soul in relation to Eternity and God would be an embarrassingly silly thing to do, is going to resound in their horror when they realize that even they have a soul, and it is not part of their flesh, and existed before they were born, and will also exist after their body dies.

And yet I took an odd thing away from my childhood Christmas in a Churchless family that in fact only rarely even thought to dignify the occasion with a tree.

We ought, he said, to know intuitively that we're going to die even if we'd never seen a corpse, never heard of death or anything, by the fact that when we're young we have an open future and we can do this and that and the other thing.

I spoke of the Jesus believing people whom Jesus sent away, even though they thought they did all they did in service to Jesus and more besides, thing to point out here is the fact that when they met Jesus their speech to him was didn't we do that and didn't we do this, that's where we fall most of the time.

But encountering a 500 - page book listing hundreds of apparent biblical contradictions, half of which I didn't even know existed before, did not have the desired affect and in fact only made things worse.

That does NOT change the Facts, does NOT even change the nature of things as they were Created.

My reasoning is that you without even knowing all the facts believe completely that the man you know as jesus was the son of your god, yet seem to be having a very difficult time accepting this man for the EXACT SAME THING.