Sentences with phrase «fact in this case admitted»

The overriding fact in this case admitted by the KBA, is that the attorneys lied to Judge Bamberger, and he is now to be punished by the KBA for exercising his proper judicial discretion.

Not exact matches

In Facebook's case, the issue is complicated by the fact that the social network has repeatedly had to admit errors in its audience - measurement analytics, including over-estimating video views for more than two yearIn Facebook's case, the issue is complicated by the fact that the social network has repeatedly had to admit errors in its audience - measurement analytics, including over-estimating video views for more than two yearin its audience - measurement analytics, including over-estimating video views for more than two years.

«While not every case will be appropriate for admissions of wrongdoing, the SEC required JPMorgan to admit the facts in the SEC's order — and acknowledge that it broke the law — because JPMorgan's egregious breakdowns in controls and governance put its millions of shareholders at risk and resulted in inaccurate public filings.»

Theists base their facts off of one book in most case, science uses numerous peer reviewed studies and unlike theologians, when science is wrong it admits it and corrects it.

While Holmes frankly admitted that he hated facts and used them only as pegs on which to hang legal principles, Brandeis, as a practicing lawyer, immersed himself in the facts of a case to show that a particular outcome was the more just.

So unless you can find a copy of John, or in the case of the previous example Mark, you can only admit the things have in fact been added to the bible.

In fact, when I first started cooking two years ago, tacos were among the first dishes to make it to my testing menu (case in point: check out these beef and chicken tacos); and I'll admit that it still ranks among my favorite meals to makIn fact, when I first started cooking two years ago, tacos were among the first dishes to make it to my testing menu (case in point: check out these beef and chicken tacos); and I'll admit that it still ranks among my favorite meals to makin point: check out these beef and chicken tacos); and I'll admit that it still ranks among my favorite meals to make.

But as Shawn and Gus investigate a series of odd cases, including spelling - bee treachery, murder at a Civil War reenactment, a sorority - house haunting and a case in which the sole witness is a cat, they inevitably produce results, a fact that even Lassiter must begrudgingly admit.

Alt hough these schools are open to all, the fact that students must apply for admission — rather than being admitted automatically, as is the case in most public schools — makes comparisons tricky.

Contrarians are fond of citing his strictures on cargo cult science (in some cases I have to admit because it always gets a rise out of me when I find it) but in fact they are the cargo cultists (he was referring to engineers and administrators who didn't want to admit that an o ring could freeze and break, and the like, because they were wedded to their ideas).

Again, this can be difficult to prove unless the truck driver admits blame — and in fact, these cases can even be harder to prove than other claims, because the injured party is not there to explain the incident him or herself.

Th ere are cases in which a solicitor would be prepared to admit guilt and to enter a plea in mitigation, were it not for the fact that an admission of dishonesty is the professional equivalent of signing one's own death warrant.

Earlier last month, the Connecticut Court of Appeals issued a written opinion in a Connecticut car accident case requiring the court to discuss the distinction between a judge's decision whether to admit certain evidence and the weight that evidence is afforded by the fact - finder once admitted.

These include: United States v. Resendiz - Ponce, which presents the question whether the omission of an element from a federal indictment can constitute harmless error (9th Circuit says no); Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc. v. Metrophones Telecommunications, Inc., on whether a provider of pay phone services can sue a long distance carrier for alleged violations of the Federal Communications Commission's regulations concerning compensation for coinless pay phone calls (9th Circuit says yes); Cunningham v. California, a sentencing case involving whether whether California's Determinate Sentencing Law violates the 6th and 14th amendments to the U.S. Constitution by permitting California state court judges at sentencing to impose enhanced sentenced based on their determination of facts neither found by the jury nor admitted by the defendant; and Carey v. Musladin, reviewing the 9th Circuit's decision to overturn a murder conviction of a defendant who claimed he was denied a fair trial because the victim's relatives appeared in court wearing buttons with the deceased's picture on them.

[43] While the cost consequences of an unreasonable failure to admit are usually confined to the costs of proving the truth of facts or the authenticity of documents, the power conferred by Rule 7 - 7 (4) to penalize a party by awarding additional costs or depriving a party of costs «as the court considers appropriate» suggests that in an appropriate case the court could go further.

Judges are in thrall to formalism, over-reliant on precedent, entranced by the past, timid around complex facts; they're unwilling to admit that their job in hard cases is to look forward, to «complete» statutes and search beyond the record so they can offer pragmatic solutions to difficult social problems.

If a request for admission is used, the lawyer will ask a party to either admit or deny some of the facts that pertain to the case in question.

For example in Ishaq v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 156, (a case about whether a woman could wear her niqab during a citizenship ceremony), six public interest groups — including the Ontario Human Rights Commission, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association and the National Council of Canadian Muslims — were refused permission to intervene, as the court determined that they could not advance their proposed arguments without social science evidence to back them up; nor could the court take judicial notice (facts and materials are accepted on a common sense basis without being formally admitted in evidence) of any of the facts necessary to support the arguments.

In this case, the citizenship is averred, but it is denied by the defendant in the manner required by the rules of pleading, and the fact upon which the denial is based is admitted by the demurreIn this case, the citizenship is averred, but it is denied by the defendant in the manner required by the rules of pleading, and the fact upon which the denial is based is admitted by the demurrein the manner required by the rules of pleading, and the fact upon which the denial is based is admitted by the demurrer.

On appeal, the Third District affirmed by relying on the general rule that «a no - accident history of the location of a premises liability case may be admitted into evidence for a variety of purposes including the central one of showing that the area was not in fact dangerous or defective.»

In cases where criminal sanctions of a relative lesser importance (custodial sentence of up to six months or a monetary penalty of up to 180 daily penalty units) are at stake, and the facts under investigation were either admitted by the offender or otherwise well established, the prosecutor may issue a penalty order without referring the matter to court adjudication.

Part of the admitted wrongdoing involves Barclays» staff deliberately submitting figures suggesting that Barclays was able to borrow money more cheaply than was in fact the case between 2007 — 2009.