Sentences with phrase «fact issues because»

There are instances where Florida law will block (or «collaterally estop» or «preclude the issue») the defendant in the civil injury case from contesting certain fact issues because those facts have already been proven in the criminal matter.

Not exact matches

Even apart from the fact that they don't know what they're talking about because they don't know what's out there, the bigger issues are that: (a) almost all of these reports come back with a variety of related findings that may be precisely on point; and (b) the very age of the prior research may be invaluable if the new questions and inquiries have to do with trend lines, changes in attitudes or different behaviors.

The fact of the matter is that boards, as self - policing bodies, may be incapable of solving the renewal issue on their own because of entrenchment and self - interest.

«This allows me to take a stand on controversial issues: In fact, it obliges me to do so because others can not.»

In fact, we want you to clarify that it's not because we don't want to have any accident or liability or any kind of issue that might come out of running a car across San Francisco with nobody in it.»

In fact, government - issued fiat currencies are accorded value only because of a government edict.»

«Mark, Sheryl and their teams are working around the clock to get all the facts and take the appropriate action moving forward, because they understand the seriousness of this issue,» a Facebook representative said in a statement following the meeting.

This fact is important because debt issued by New York, for a New York resident, is generally free from federal, state, local, and federal alternative minimum taxes.

The fact is that over the past decade, the EURO countries have not been willing to take policy actions to ensure the stability of the EURO, because they involved issues related to sovereignty and fiscal integration: two areas where there were opposing entrenched views.

The fact is that the issues you speak of are not because the people are members of the LDS church but in fact this is what happens in any society of humans living as close together as we do in large cities.

Now there are cases where they seem to have been moved because of this issue and I would like to see those dealt with but they are a minority of the cases when you look at that facts.

Some athiests are just as bad as the fundimentalists... because they «know» I being and agnostic, however, take issue with anyone who says that people who are not religious do not think... in fact, it has been found that statistically, athiests and agnostics know the bible better than christians.

In fact, the reference in the April issue was a little bit more than mildly annoying, mostly because it was a mixture of fact and fiction.

I wouldn't be surprised to learn that many of those who do in fact leave the Church over issues related to sexuality do so because they've been told over and over again that their value as a Christian, and as a human being, is wrapped up in their virginity, so they no longer feel welcomed or worthy.

We do know basic facts and those point towards issues of concern, concern because trust and loyalty and commitment are not throwaway traits whenever temptations strike.

The reason I speak out about this issue is not because I am passionately committed to the theory of evolution; it's because I am passionately committed to the fact that it's not worth leaving the faith over!

This is because the Bible is not, in fact, univocal on important issues.»

So, having said these things, I will still vote for President Obama not so much for the other issues I agree with him (immigration and especially economy), but because of the facts you Baptist Minister also mentioned about Bishop Romney (he was indeed a Mormon priest in Boston and a Mormon missionary in France).

The most unnerving issue isn't that he says this or believes it, it's the fact that he preaches and advocates this to people who believe and follow what he says only because they think he's some kind of advocate for a higher power.

These churches do this because their leaders are in fact, themselves wealthy so they'll always pretend like issues such as «gay marriage» are vital issues for the church while ignoring issues like corporate outsourcing thanks to the sweetheart trade deals our corrupt officials pass with bi-partisan support.

Yahweh in hebrew means my Lord and is a common reference meaning supreme God.In the bible satan is referred specifically as the adversary in hebrew or slanderer in greek its quite clear there is no confusion.Satan is not in the same league as God he is sovereign in fact God has satan on a leash and limits his control particularly over his people as we read in Job.Christians need to realise that satan can influence us if we walk according to the flesh.In the case of David calling a cencus meant he gave in to his pride he wanted to know how many soldiers he had believing numbers would give him the upper hand and so Satan took advantage of his weakness and Davids choice displeased God.David of all people should have known as he as a young man had defeated goliath a mighty warrior and it was because of his faith and trust in God that he overcame.But it wasnt God that made David make that decision it was his own and satan tempted him and he gave in to that desire In the two verses there is no confusion if you understand how God and satan operate i did at one stage have the same issue with Jesus sending the demons into the pigs why would he help satan or at least it appeared that way?

I wonder what Graham has to say about their signs that suggest they chose to stop carrying the Muppet toys because they were unsafe, something which is a blatant lie, or the fact that Chick - fil - A was caught creating fake FB accounts to post supportive comments about this issue on their corporate FB site.

The fact that it is not offensive indicates that you are a fair mined person, but this may be beside the point as well, because any religious symbols paid for by the state on public property is the issue.

In fact, that was a major issue when I first started pastoring; the people were so accustomed to Greek and Hebrew priestcraft in the sermon that they thought I didn't value the languages because I didn't do it.

In fact, some of his greatest arguments with the soldiers / governments over the years have been over this very issue — the humans are afraid and so they want to kill the aliens while he wants to encourage life and cooperation (thinking in particular of the Ninth Doctor with Harriet Jones or even the battle of Canary Wharf when we lost Rose because of Torchwood opening the breach etc.).

But the fact that so many television critics are taking serious issue with how shows are treating their women and sexuality is notable, if only because this sort of outrage was generally laughed off a few years ago.

JA — two points, (i) yes you have, because I regularly post it; and (ii) I see you have no issue with what I said, just the fact that I said it.

There were other issues too: The way the accounts of Israel's monarchy contradicted one another, the way Jesus and Paul quoted Hebrew Scripture in ways that seemed to stretch the original meaning, the fact that women were considered property in Levitical Law, the way both science and archeology challenged the historicity of so many biblical texts, and the fact that it was nearly impossible for me to write a creative retelling of Resurrection Day because each of the gospel writers tell the story so differently, sometimes with contradictory details.

But what we just have to wonder is how about the hundreds of people he helped put to death in Texas who were later found to be innocent, because he would not issue a thirty day reprieve as governor which he COULD have done to get more facts on those cases?

It seems that there are further basic arguments which Hartshorne could level against Craighead's claim, charging, for example, that it is a fallacy of composition to assert that because we can conceive of the nonexistence of some things we can conceive of the nonexistence of all things.4 Craighead has in fact anticipated that fallacy charge as it applies in this issue (ECCC 122f).

fBrainwashed fool prattle on endlessly about liberals because that's what they've been trained to do to cover up for the fact they can't intelligently discuss issues.

In fact, I've known more than one Christian couple to break up early in their marriage because of major sexual repression issues that stemmed from the guilt associated with sex.

Next, I Assess (in brevity), historical facts of the treatment of Blacks in the United States because this issue is a stumbling block among Christians.

But some facts that only minority know and understand completely, a person can manipulate it and distribute it and mass majority will accept it because they don't master that subject and they do not want to go deep into it because psychologically they have been forced not to by that person manipulation of the issue.

West chooses to reply to this point because he considers the issue of concupiscence «pivotal» and calls it, in fact, the «pearl» of John Paul ll's teaching.

This issue was raised because the Commerce Commission gave weight to the fact that the proposed merger would reduce media plurality, considering that would potentially significantly impact democracy in New Zealand, and therefore New Zealand consumers generally.

«I hate the fact that we're having to affect the racing because of the technical issues.

But continue to stoop to the level of a pre-teen by questioning a man's mental faculties (and conveniently ignore the fact that you all have armchair coached and talked about the same shit in the Eddie Jordan era, the Flip Saunders era, and the Randy Wittman era), because that's clearly the issue at hand here and not the fact that you're staring at a treadmill team for the duration of Wall's extension, regardless of who the coach is.

«Because of the time - zone - difference issues, people may use us initially as the Olympics» electronic TV Guide,» says Feuer, referring to the fact that the Internet will serve as a daily preview of NBC's prime - time, tape - delayed event coverage.

This is an issue that gets Trump's supporters all riled up, primarily because people deliberately overlook the fact that these protests were never intended to attack the flag, first responders, or the American military.

Any motivate the players he don't know how to be tactical he just picks the team and tells the same thing it's not working change it ever team will not play open so wenger needs to change the team players and style to defeat that also if a team presses us wenger does nothing to get round that same team same tactics that's the issue that's why arsenal won't win the league it's like a boxer going for head all the time you need to go for body to open up the other for the head shot wenger is to soft and it's transfers to the players remember the team he had before always makeing runs stretching teams even if they are sitting back spread there whole back line and midfield with run after run arsenal don't do that anymore they don't even shoot outside the box you know why because wenger tells them not to another tactic to draw another team out Ramsey can shoot but he never shoots anymore why is that wenger fact thanks guys.

(1) this squad has way too many moving parts and very few of our players are good enough at their preferred position let alone relying on them in whatever position Wenger and his magic eight ball decide in the tunnel prior to the game... when teams do this it generally signals issues within the club, much like Jose last year and Van Gael before him... no one gets settled, the chemistry is almost non-existent and if provides a built - in excuse when the team comes up short... these issues fall squarely on Wenger, both for his decisions regarding players coming in and for his inability to rid the team of those players who aren't cutting it... in actually fact we have only 6 real starters on this current squad and that's being generous (Sanchez, Ozil, Lacazette, Sead, Kos & Cazorla)... which is discouraging because Cazorla is injured and might never play again, Sanchez is wanting out and the club is lying to us about his injury status, Lacazette receives no service, Ozil is relatively disinterested out there, Kos is getting up there and Sead is just trying to settle in... there isn't a single other player that would start regularly on any of the other top 3 teams, which should be the standard... imagine this team moving forward if Wenger only sells before the window closes

Mayfield has his flaws, but please fact check before you say he has a lot of off field issues because he had one arrest in college while drunk.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

And not just because of the fact that in last year's College Football Playoff, the SEC team, Alabama, had fewer glaring injury issues than any of the other three.

The fact we didn't bring in someone in January could be due to a plethora of issues, not just because poch didn't want to.

As Arsenal fans and Wenger (a man on a completely different planet to the «joe daddy's» of this world on an intellectual level), have been pointing out that the attitude from the media, the referees, FA, and gormless morons like «joe» are directly to blame for the fact that these teams go out there and hack the sh!t out of everyone with impunity because they are just too F$ ^ & % g thick to understand what the issue is.

I really loved Natasha's (Natural Urban Mama's) post about this, http://blog.naturalurbanmamas.com/?p=1998, because she calls attention to the fact that women are feeling so guilty and ashamed about their parenting choices that they are projecting it onto this issue when it is so obviously not about that.

Is your child very sick all of the time (because breastmilk is best for that), is your child not growing at the rate expected (then there are tests which need to be done that have nothing to do with breastfeeding), does your child have some developmental issues that need to be looked at (again which will have nothing to do with the fact that they are breastfeeding or not).

Yes, and whoever wrote the boy's response for him seemed to overlook the fact that citing Laura Bush would raise some interesting issues, because in this same Iowa speech, Christie told folks «I think that this intervention into our school system is just another example of how the Obamas believe that they've got a better answer for everything than you do,» according to the CBS article you cite.