Sentences with phrase «fact scenario before»

In an ideal world, one might dream of judges recasting each proposition, principle and fact scenario before them in their own finely crafted prose.

Not exact matches

In this scenario, I think they remembered that interview and said, «Before we get all the facts, the last thing we want is to put Mark out there in front of the press to say something that we're going to backtrack later on.»

I seem to remember early last season going through this same scenario, when we were even further behind the League leaders (in fact relegation was mentioned at one point) but our «despicable manager» turned it around, brought Arsenal all the way back up to Third Place, and helped us to retain the FA Cup before the seasons end.

like I've said before, Wenger is simply stating that Sanchez is staying so that he can regain some leverage when it comes time to make a deal and to shift the focus back squarely on Sanchez... this is 101 tactics in PR management... the very fact that he even mentioned RVP's name speaks to the utterance arrogance of a man that believes he answers to no one... before you harshly judge Sanchez think carefully about what the ultimate intentions of both parties involved... Sanchez wants to win trophies and get paid generously for his efforts, whereas the club wants to pull the wool over our eyes once again so that we blame the player for wanting the very things we told him we wanted when we brought him in... how many times do we have to go down this road before we realize the only common factor in each of these scenarios is the club itself... trust me, if we showed any ambition Sanchez's contract demands would be much different... just like in other major sports players will take a «home town» discount if they see those in charge making a truly honest attempt to fight for the highest honours in their respective fields... that being said, if they see a team trying to make disparaging remarks about them in the press and not following through on their promises, they will likely try to make them pay a premium for their services or seek greener pastures... btw if anyone simply looks at the score versus Bayern today and thinks that even for a second that this was a deserved victory, just watch the game and judge for yourself... actually save yourself the anguish and just know that if it weren't for Cech and Martinez this could have been a repeat of our Champions League flopping or worse

To know the real scenario before writing your report it is very important to analyze the facts and data you have and research on it.

We pride ourselves in the fact that we have never lost a key before, but we all know that accidents happen and would like to prepare for the worst case scenario.

I was simply providing an obvious scenario based on the simple facts of how SPG points are earned and then transferred, whether one transfers 20K points or slogs away to get 80K points, 1 point / $ at the tune of $ 80k, before transferring.

And that's before we get into the fact that, realistically, none of your entire scenario is actually free of emissions.

It is interesting that Sir Geoffrey Vos specifically referred to the fact that attempts to settle a prospective claim before it materialises should be considered to fall within the litigation scenario not outside it.

Before panic descends and we begin imagining scenarios where redundancies abound and pink slips are handed out en masse, let's focus instead on the boring facts.

No agency, government or otherwise, has the legal / moral authority to invent scenarios, and then to establish pre-judgement dictums before the fact.