Sentences with phrase «fact the evidence points»

Not exact matches

«Although the Government points to the fact that Congress and the Executive identified the seven countries named in the Executive Order as countries of concern in 2015 and 2016, the Government has not offered any evidence or even an explanation of how the national security concerns that justified those designations, which triggered visa requirements, can be extrapolated to justify an urgent need for the Executive Order to be immediately reinstated,» the judges wrote.
It was a volatile close to the third quarter for the stock market, as evidenced by the fact that the Dow fluctuated by at least 100 points in either direction for five days in a row last week.
The evidence points to the fact that your mindset is malleable.
«We are doing what journalists throughout said mainstream media are supposed to do: challenge the conventional wisdom, hold politicians» feet to the fire, ask tough questions, report facts that are in many cases inconvenient truths for career politicians, and give a voice to the millions of people worldwide who have had theirs taken away from them by world elites who consider the ordinary person beneath them,» Boyle said, pointing to Breitbart's record July traffic as evidence Americans «hunger for something different.»
I don't have a ton of empirical evidence for that last point, other than the fact that hedge fund managers get paid a lot, and there is therefore no obvious lack of incentives to manage a hedge fund.
However, this does not imply some of the more ridiculous tenets of creationism (such as man walking with dinosaurs or the world being 6000 years old) should be objectively viewed as truth when all evidence points to evolution as fact.
For example, there is certainly not more evidence for creation and evolution is a fact at this point because the evidence is so overwhelming (genetic evidence is so strong, fossils are no longer even needed).
All evidence points to the fact Gods plan is working just as intended.
----------------- Your opinions on the Bible are of no consequence in this case, since the manuscript evidence proves the point that Constantine in fact did not invent the divinity of Jesus.
All biblical evidence points to the fact that there was an understanding about the nature of the earth and many other topics far beyond the secular understanding of the time.
As much as your point is dead - on, I'm sorry to say you may as well be shouting in a hurricane: The faithful will never let anything like facts, logic, evidence or even rationality get in the way of their beliefs.
You simply can't or won't face the fact that all evidence points to the facts that your conscious self is solely the product of your physical existence, that you are limited and temporary, and that there are no such things as gods, souls, heavens, hells, etc..
At this point as far as the earth is round question we consider that answer so refined and mounted in evidence that we can say it is indeed a fact at this point and will never change until an event takes place that actually changes it shape.
Case in point: They believe in ID despite the fact that not one, single piece of evidence has been found in support of it, and not one single experiment has provided any proof for it.
What I actually do is point out that is, in fact, no evidence or reason to believe such a being exists.
In point of fact, there are millions of people out there who embrace different beliefs who are just as sure they have evidence as you.
The fact that you people completely ignore pretty much every question I pose to you is evidence to me I'm making valid points you don't want to deal with.
In point of fact Christianity is an elaborate web of such theories and claims, none of which is supported by any objective evidence.
In fact most of the evidence points to the idea that the Proto - European (from whom almost all white people are decended) people bypassed the Levant entirely
The intuitional evidence for belief in Allah, the belief based upon the recognition of Allah by our inner consciousness, is brought to our attention in the Qur» an by pointing out the important psychological fact that there is an instinctive feeling of faith in Almighty Allah, the Creator of the universe, which comes to men when they are free from inclinations, or the distractions of dull routines, or when surprised by the question of the origin of the universe, or when faced with hardships or misfortunes which they can not overcome by themselves.
The prolific Jesuit scholar, Fr James Schall, now in his eighties, has given us this book about the pleasure of knowing the truth of things, in particular the delight of discovering coherence from reflecting upon diverse aspects of existence, of realising that all sorts of «scraps of evidence» point to the fact that only Christianity provides an adequate account of our existence.
All things, seen and unseen point to the fact that there is a God, a Creator, the Divine Designer, anf there is an evil being, whose evidence is so clearly seen also.
Although I have my personal belief regarding these things here, as long as I can not offer watertight Scriptural evidence for my confidence, I can only copy and paste some verses which could point to the fact that God meets every human being twice or even three times during his lifetime in order to show him the way he should go and to bring him to repentance.
There is, in fact, plenty of evidence that points toward the reality of God and that makes reasonable the Christian claim about Jesus Christ.
While all evidence, logic and reasoning point to a Creator and absolute truth, you prefer to hide behind relativism and a theory of evolution which does not, in fact, describe the creation of the universe at all, or why concepts of good and evil or morality exist.
As a matter of fact, there doesn't exist any book that has evidence and guidance like the Quran in the world today (and up until this point).
He also creates all this evidence that scientists have discovered pointing to the fact that the earth, mankind and the universe have been around far longer that 10,000 years.
I made an illusion to the fact that there are other things that obviously exist without evidence to others and asked for him to prove his point.
In science, a scientific theory is the graduation point of well researched and collaborated facts and evidence that explain something.
If you did acknowledge the evidence and where it points, you would then be faced with the fact that you are a sinner and accountable to this most Holy God and are now going to die.
Although scientists behave as if their theories are facts, often arguing ferociously against critics, key paradigms of science can shift rapidly and fundamentally when empirical evidence reaches a tipping point.
While you may not believe in God, the man named Jesus, or any other deity, there is in fact, historical evidence pointing at least to the possibility of the existence of the man named Jesus and that many, many people were willing to change their lives, risk their lives and even be persecuted and executed in the name of this man named Jesus.
On the contrary, from a creationist point of view, the very fact that the universe is on the whole orderly, in a manner comprehensible to our intellect, is evidence that we and it were fashioned by a common intelligence.
And all of this evidence will point us to one single fact.
I guess I have reached a point that, if it can't be backed up with such obvious scientific evidence, then it is not important enough for me to accept it as a fact... yet... even if I would like for it to be true.
All the evidence pointed to the fact that Muhammad wished Ali to succeed him with complete authority to guide the people.
In fact, the way some atheist's actions speak louder than their words provides me with evidence that points to God.
It is a way of pointing out the rather extraordinary fact that the primary and really convincing evidence which Christians claim to discover for the reality and power of God for them is in their relation to Jesus.
In fact, the evidence points more towards the idea that he did not exist.
NOVA explores a range of intriguing new evidence for Neanderthal self - expression and language, all pointing to the fact that we may have seriously underestimated our mysterious, long - vanished human cousins.
Yeah, but they are biased in that they seek to prove everything through the lens of evolution so they often look in the wrong direction, and a large number of scientists are in fact Christians My point is this, if you take the time to look for the evidence and be open to it, you will find that there is a respectable amount of evidence to support the fact that there is a god and that he is the God of Christianity
In point of fact, no evidence whatsoever is offered to prove that this couple was maritally successful in any way; actually a great deal of evidence exists to the contrary.
In other words, the evidence seems to point to the fact that alcoholism comes in people, not in bottles.
This fact points to their being not only distinctive but the authentic words of Jesus.20 However, it is in the parables that he finds the fullest evidence that Jesus believed he had been sent by God to inaugurate the kingdom.
How shall we account for his present dejected state except basically by the fact that, following that exalted vision of species in growth, he is now confronted by an accumulation of scientific evidence pointing to the reverse — the species doomed to extinction?
Indeed, the direct evidence that in fact exists, and it is not slight, contradicts, almost point for point, each of Ford's attributions.
The big bang has evidence and make's sense, it's a fact that the universe is expanding therefore logically it had a point where this expansion begun and the evidence suggests so.
Consider four points: (1) the change in the discouraged disciples, (2) the empty tomb, (3) the fact that the first witnesses were women, and (4) the very early evidence in I Corinthians 15.
In fact, all the evidence points to the fact that your bible simply repeats the myths and stories of earlier religions.
As a christian apologist, Chad, has 2000 years of «facts and testimony» to draw on to defend the delusion, not to the degree of proof or evidence; only to the point that a whole lot of people bought into the scam, therefore the scam is true based on the bible, why, because a 2000 year old book, that very same bible says so, which completes the circle.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z