Sentences with phrase «fact the family courts»

You'll be in a situation where you're trussed into a process — there used to be a sense that if you went on the witness stand and you took an oath then you would tell the truth because the sanctions for not telling the truth were very great, people were worries about perjury and contempt of court — and in fact the family courts can make a reference to the criminal courts for prosecution for perjury but they just don't do it.

Not exact matches

It's the fact that Allen owns six adjacent mansions which house members of his family, a full - sized basketball court, fitness center, ballroom, swimming pool with water slide, and more.

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the ruling on Friday, saying the family had not persuaded the three - judge panel «that the individual prayers or other remarks to be given by students at graduation are, in fact, school - sponsored.»

But the fact that a court order wasn't put up with the name of the family court judge... I find very, very, very odd.

She credits her length of service here to the fact that the working environment at the Windsor Court Hotel is so family oriented.

In some cases, these allegations are backed by facts or evidence, and family courts should consider them when making important custody and support decisions.

«The fact that nearly half of people face going to court without any legal representation in family law cases is hugely worrying,» Emma Pearmaine, head of family and matrimonial at the firm said.

«We want the voters» voices to be heard; that's the idea here,» said Walsh, who is simultaneously running for re-election to family court with the Democratic committee's backing --- a fact that has chapped some party faithful.

«In fact, I have spoken to almost all the people that are affected by the court decision and assured them of my readiness to work with them to ensure that the party returns as one family,» Sheriff said.

MAYVILLE - The Democratic Nominee for Chautauqua County Family Court Judge has received an unfavorable rating for a local judicial commission — despite the fact that she received a favorable rating just two years earlier.

In fact, he nobly defends his family in court when they can't afford a lawyer by using good ol' «common sense.»

The original screenplay uses newly discovered facts, court records and speculation as the foundation for an imaginative spellbinding story of family, obsession, love and loss.

In fact, attendance also improved among the kids whose parents did not join ESAP, perhaps because the families realized that court intervention could be the next step.

Universities Run Into Problems When They Hire Presidents From The Business World Think Progress, 3/7/16 «Richard P. Chait, a research professor at the Harvard Graduate School of Education, adds that this mentality may be driven by the fact that more families tend to look at themselves as customers — especially the families of students with the most impressive applications who find themselves courted by Ivy League universities.»

In these circumstances the Court decided to refer the following questions for a preliminary ruling to the CJEU: 1) whether for the purposes of Art. 2 (2)(c), Member States can require the direct descendant who is older than 21 years to have tried, without success, to obtain employment in the country of origin in order to be regarded as «dependant» and fall within the scope of the provision; and 2) whether in interpreting the term «dependant» any significance should be attached to the fact that the family member is, due to the personal circumstances such as age, education and health, deemed to obtain employment in the host Member State, which would mean that the conditions of dependence will no longer be met.

This is also the case in respect of domestic violence or of exclusion orders (mercifully, the former sop to The Daily Mail and assorted Tory MPs in the Family Law Act 1996, s 41 (which said that if a couple were not married then «the court [should] have regard to the fact that they have not given each other the commitment involved in marriage») has been repealed).

I suspect that the people demonstrating outside the courthouse about family law are not complaining about the fact that Dispute Resolution Officers outside Toronto are not being paid, or about the lack of Unified Family Courts across the profamily law are not complaining about the fact that Dispute Resolution Officers outside Toronto are not being paid, or about the lack of Unified Family Courts across the proFamily Courts across the province.

Pursuant to South Carolina Rule of Family Court 26 (a & b): An order or judgment pursuant to an adjudication in a domestic relations case shall set forth the specific findings of fact and conclusions of law to support the court's deciCourt 26 (a & b): An order or judgment pursuant to an adjudication in a domestic relations case shall set forth the specific findings of fact and conclusions of law to support the court's decicourt's decision.

One fact that is difficult for many divorcing couples to grasp is that just because something is ordered in family court does not mean third parties must adhere to it.

In fact, modern family law often never requires anyone to attend court.

In National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra, will the Supreme Court rule that any state - licensed healthcare providers were improperly denied an injunction over California's Reproductive FACT Act?

This appeal considered whether a commissioning body can, by its decision not to fund a particular option for contact, remove the jurisdiction of the Court of Protection to make a best interests decision about contact, and whether the failure to conduct a best interests assessment and / or determine the facts breached the appellant's rights under the ECHR to a fair trial and a family life.

An order made by a circuit judge sitting in the county court that a fact finding hearing should be undertaken by a family proceedings court was set aside on six grounds including that a transfer down of a discrete part of proceedings could not be permitted (see Re C (a child)[2008] All ER (D) 168 (Apr)-RRB-.

«While this court must take and does take the issue of abuse of a child very seriously,» the footnote said, «the fact that a trial judge tells parents that unless one of them «cops to an admission of what happened to the child» they are going to lose their child, flies in the face of not only the CPSL, but of the entire body of case law with regard to best interests of the child and family reunification.

Among the newly specified dodgy arguments against a MF — delicately put as «factors which should not outweigh the presumption in favour of allowing the assistance of a MF» — are the confidentiality of the proceedings and sensitivity of information in the court papers relating to the family's affairs; the LIP's apparent capacity to proceed without a MF; the fact that the LIP is unrepresented through choice; the fact that the hearing is a directions or case management hearing; and the MF's membership of an organisation which promotes a particular cause.

Family law is a unique species of civil law for many reasons, but primarily because of: the frequency with which disputes brought to court concern social, psychological and emotional issues rather than legal; the almost complete absence of circumstances in which a specific legal conclusion invariably and inevitably results from a particular set of facts; and, the range of other areas of the law that may be concurrently applicable, such as contracts, tax, conflicts, real property, negligence, torts and trusts.

The court said that in circumstances where the will draftsman stood to benefit under the will, it would need to be shown that P's attention was drawn to the fact that the will removed the gifts to his family members and charities, and reduced the gift to his former partner.

Besides the fact that I am a Florida Supreme Court Certified Family Mediator, I am also intent on providing my clients with the legal assistance and skilled representation that they need.

The following facts were confirmed according to the records of this case and examination results by the family court probation officers:

The importance of the issues is highlighted by the fact that the court was constituted of five judges including the president of the Queen's Bench Division, and Sir Mark Potter, president of the Family Division.

He started with the reminder to himself and the court as to the limits of the courts powers in relation to mature children: «A further and central element of the situation is that the children of this family are in fact young persons, being boys now aged 17 and 15.

All were agreed that the appeal must be allowed with the result that, at the end of a process which started with allegations made in August 2014, and in included a substantial trial before a High Court Judge, any findings of fact made by the Judge and recorded in her oral determinations made in December 2016 and on 30 January 2017 must be set aside and must be disregarded in any future dealings with this family.

She has appeared in the following reported cases: S v S [2017] EWHC 1298 (Fam) involving a fact - finding about allegations of grave harm to the mother and the child and evidence from experts in Iranian family law; and Re: Rodwell [2016] EWHC 1731 (Fam), which centred on questions about whether the court had jurisdiction to make orders concerning the family.

The court looked at the facts of where he and his family lived their lives and, although he did not have permanent residency in England, the facts in this case verified that the running of his life and private affairs occurred in England.

The fact that the schedule to the Supreme Court Act 1981 assigns proceedings under CSA 1991 to the Family Division which, by the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 (MFPA 1984), s 32, makes them family proceedings, is hardly of conseqFamily Division which, by the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 (MFPA 1984), s 32, makes them family proceedings, is hardly of conseqFamily Proceedings Act 1984 (MFPA 1984), s 32, makes them family proceedings, is hardly of conseqfamily proceedings, is hardly of consequence.

This applies both where that advice is limited in time, eg until after a criminal defence statement has been filed and served and, worse still, the advice is given not to make such a response at all; • (f) the date on which a party to care proceedings is to file and serve a criminal defence statement in linked criminal proceedings is wholly irrelevant to the court's determination of the date on which that party should file and serve a response to threshold and / or to file and serve a narrative statement in the care proceedings; • (g) the mere fact that a party is ordered to file and serve a response to threshold and / or to file and serve a narrative statement before the date a criminal defence statement is to be filed and served in criminal proceedings is not a ground for failing to comply with the former order; • (h) it [is not] a ground for an application to extend the time for compliance with an order to file and serve a response to threshold and / or to file and serve a narrative statement until a date after the criminal defence statement has been filed and served; and • (i) any issue about alleged prejudice to a defendant in criminal proceedings based on him being required to file and serve a response to threshold and / or to file and serve a narrative statement before the date of a criminal defence statement is to be filed and served, or at all, only arises and is only potentially relevant if and when an application is made by the police and / or a co-accused for statements and documents filed in the family proceedings to be disclosed into linked criminal proceedings [see Re C (A Minor)(Care Proceedings: Disclosure)[1997] Fam 76, [1997] 2 WLR 322, sub nom Re EC (Disclosure of Material)[1996] 2 FLR 725, CA].

However, a family court judge will soon hear from the father directly to determine if the problem has in fact been addressed.

On the legal aid cuts it comments: «A consequence (unintended perhaps, but in fact entirely foreseeable) which threatens swiftly to engulf and maybe even overwhelm the judicial system is that family courts at all levels will become thronged with a tsunami of LIPs... The quality of justice will be strained, its administration delayed, its delivery potentially denied.»

Irwin Mitchell has won a Supreme Court victory acting for the family of an asbestos - related cancer victim, who can now receive compensation despite the fact that the man was not an employee at the factory where he came into contact with the toxic substance.

Irwin Mitchell has won a landmark case in the Supreme Court on behalf of a deceased asbestos - related cancer victim, whose family will now receive compensation despite the fact that he was an employee at the factory where he worked with the toxic substance.

South Carolina Code § 63-3-810 (A)(1) allows the family court to appoint a guardian ad litem in a private custody case when «without a guardian ad litem, the court will likely not be fully informed about the facts of the case and there is a substantial dispute which necessitates a guardian ad litem.»

She is widely respected in the profession, demonstrated by the fact she is one of only two solicitors in the country sitting on the committee that reviews the Family Court rules and procedures.

The judgment of the court found that the complainant was not a credible witness and in fact had lied in her family court affidavit.

This fact in and of itself does not sit well with family members because in these type of claims the family members, the insurance companies and the courts really end up dissecting the role of the deceased in the family unit.

Cases such as this largely depend on their particular facts, although the board did rely on the principles set out by the Federal Court of Appeal's Johnstone decision to determine whether there was a prima facie case of discrimination based on family status.

In fact, it may become common for video conferencing to be utilized in just about all family law, traffic, juvenile and small claims courts.

It seems likely that judges in all courts (criminal, family and civil) will be increasingly wary in future of allowing expert evidence alone to determine crucial disputes as to fact and causation.

In fact, the American Law Institute's Principles of Family Dissolution recommend that Courts use a years - of - marriage - based schedule in determining an alimony award.

Chapter 8: Family Lawyer as Limited Scope Litigation Counsel How Self - Represented Parties Experience Litigation Rules Governing Limited Scope Court Appearances A Friendly Word of Caution Basic Checklist of Tasks to Allocate in the Litigation Context Fact Gathering and Legal Research Organizing by Tasks and Substantive Areas Additional Litigation - Related Ethical Considerations Practice Tips Endnotes

«Having acted as a litigant in person for nine months in my family court proceedings, I felt that I needed some professional assistance in my four day fact finding hearing.