Thus it would seem that what Boswell and others attribute to society's prejudices is in
fact the necessary logic of the movement they champion.
Not exact matches
Smith believes that Hartshorne takes too lightly the view that
logic marks out the domain of the «
necessary,» while the «real» coincides with the domain of
fact.
Regarding the contents of the book, this meant that all the subjects of higher mathematics (such as mathematical
logic, group theory, analytic, non-euclidian, and projective geometries, and integral calculus) could not be dealt with.2 The simpler manner of presentation was conditioned by the
fact that neither the
necessary mathematical symbols (such as the symbolism of mathematical
logic used in PM or that of analytical geometry used in UA) nor the rigorous mathematical methods (such as axioms, definitions, and proofs) could be utilized.
I believe that Hartshorne takes too lightly the force of the view according to which
logic marks out the domain of the «
necessary» — sometimes construed as the tautological — while the «real» coincides with contingent existence in the domain of
fact.
In
fact, with the Haptic tablet, Axon
Logic has set its eyes on the Apple's iPad and is enticing users by saying «touch a full blown OS instead of an OS meant for a phone,» in what is a direct reference to the iOS which is essentially the iPhone software that also finds application in the iPad albeit after
necessary modifications.
Yes, complaining about something that is inevitable, inescapable consequence of
logic — like the
fact that rain, while
necessary to sustain life, still sucks because it makes you wet — is indeed a neurosis.
A good copy - editor also
fact - checks where
necessary, ensures that elements of plot and character are internally consistent, and points out problems in story
logic.
They are trained in mustering the
necessary facts and
logic to defend their position.