Sentences with phrase «fact we both know such»

Not exact matches

SONDERS: The uncertainty factor lifted, and you just can't help but wonder whether that uncertainty was such a weight that regardless of who won, the fact that at least we knew who the ultimate victor was would have been enough to incite a rally.

Although forward - looking statements contained in this press release reflect the Company's good faith judgment, such statements can only be based on facts and factors currently known to it.

Companies» legal counsel and advisers, who perhaps were trained during the cyanide - in - Tylenol days, fall back on old maxims that no longer apply — such as «We will not comment on an ongoing investigation» or «We'll inform the public as soon as when know the complete facts.»

Sacca, who is known for his early investments in tech companies such as Twitter and Uber, launched into an impassioned speech criticizing the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, firing off a barrage of charges against Trump that were as fast, furious, and hard to fact check as those coming from the candidates themselves.

We appreciate you stopping by, love the fact that you know what you want and have such a great taste in time pieces.

While Apple is known primarily for its focus on music, the fact that Schusser also has a background in tech acquisitions — such as Shazam — and will work part of the time in Culver City suggests that Shazam and movies could become a serious part of Apple's ambitions, as opposed to just bonus content for music lovers.

The SEC already gains some of its funding through such a tax mechanism, a fact that many people don't know.

Companies such as Verizon are known to bundle Internet, cable and landlines, but AT&T is moving to become the first to combine cellular with other services — a fact that the wireless behemoth was not shy about pointing out in its announcement.

Influencer Alissa Ashley, who has nearly a million subscribers, said she was frustrated by the shades or (lack thereof) in her own video review, saying that they appeared «orange» on her skin even after mixing two different shades, opting out of an extended wear test out of principle, and telling Tarte, «The fact that there is such a limited shade range for people of color, people with melanin, is just so disappointing and honestly, I'm shocked that Tarte would do this given the fact they knew that people were so excited for this.»

In fact, Uber has decided to no longer reject applicants with records of certain non-violent or non-sexual offenses, such as petty theft and check fraud, the company told the Wall Street Journal.

In fact, as someone who emphasizes risk management to such a high degree, I think Marks would be able to appreciate some trend following strategies, which rely not on intuition, but rather on rules to determine when the odds are no longer favorable.

In fact, products such as Folgers may even do better as people shy away from $ 4 lattes and cappuccinos yet want to stick to brand names they know and trust.

In addition, due to the fact that the first quarter 2015 results are included within the financial results for the six - month period included in the Quarterly Report on Form 10 - Q for the period ended June 30, 2015 and the financial results for the nine - month period included in the Quarterly Report on Form 10 - Q for the period ended September 30, 2015, management, the Committee and the Board have concluded that the financial statements for such six - month and nine - month periods reflected in those Quarterly Reports should no longer be relied upon.

In fact, it can be so sophisticated that through their solution providers, consumer brands know a lot about any individual consumer, such as the consumer's demographic data, location, preferences, habits, and even his or her social circle, in some cases.

In fact, I know several financial planners who recommend nothing but ETF portfolios for their clients (even though many won't because they don't get paid through such recommendations).

Another fact most people won't know is that despite my success with StrategicBusinessTeam.com; I still failed to get two blogs off the ground in 2012, despite investing time and capital in such projects.

That the banks well knew how to profit from the joint manipulation of financial benchmarks, despite any purported differences in interest between and amongst them on a given day, is confirmed by the fact that this [alleged price manipulation of the London Gold Fix] is just one in a series of such behaviors.

While a commercial Moon delivery service may seem like a novelty to some, Astrobotic CEO Jim Thornton knows that such a service fills a very real need in the marketplace — in fact, as Thornton explains to Chad Anderson in this week's Space Angels podcast, Astrobotic has over a hundred deals in their pipeline, all awaiting rides to the lunar surface.

I know good scientists and theologians to turn to for answers to these deep questions, and it is not an insult (and in fact it is a compliment) to not expect elected officeholders to speak ex cathedra on such issues despite their own personal charisma.

Do you know the mathematical impossibility that even one of these could randomly come into existance?Let alone all of the building blocks required for just a single simple cell to come together to form any type of living thing?There sure should be some blobs of fossilized transitions if evolution could happen.You people are real smart why don't you quit bashing Christians and quit believing the garbage you have been fed, and look up the evidence put forth by the Creation Research people.They have in fact proven creation down to a cellular level.Unlike evolution scientists who have no answers, but cleverly devised fables.Evolution is not even a very good fairy tale.Even if I didn't believe in God, Evolution is such a fools explanation of the origin of man that it takes just that to even consider it true.I understand though that you athiests will believe anything that allows you to love your sin and hatred of the one true God.

But the fact remains that there are clearly societal and circumstantial oppression which will continue to make such change impossible for some no matter how hard they try.

In fact, everyone I know who has either come into the Church or returned to it in the last 20 years has done so because of all the things that Charles Reid would reject and call «right wing,» things that are in fact unclassifiable by such ossified and brittle ideological categories.

In regards to your comment «the fact that you even know about Euhemerus is a product of Christian learning and appreciation of alternate views», we should, indeed, be thankful for early Christian monks who helped preserve the knowledge of prior centuries, but perhaps you are unaware of the contribution of Greek civilization to Western culture and the «Age of Enlightenment» in late 17th century Europe with figures such as Denis Diderot, Jean le Rond d'Alembert, Voltaire, Baruch Spinoza, etc..

Does he tell you facts that you couldn't possibly know otherwise, such as your complete genome pattern, or who are the «real killers» in the OJ case, or what's inside of Arcturus?

I know for a fact that JW's believe that having anything to do with holidays or birthdays is wrong — since 90 % of wrapped gifts involve birthdays, Valentine's, or Christmas, why would a real JW ever take such a job?

«From this it is very clear that the mark which was set upon the descendants of Cain was a skin of blackness, and there can be no doubt that this was the mark that Cain himself received; in fact, it has been noticed in our day that men who have lost the spirit of the Lord, and from whom His blessings have been withdrawn, have turned dark to such an extent as to excite the comments of all who have known them.»

No doubt such explanations are partly true, but they may also be formulas for self - deception, causing us to miss the miraculous fact that we are there to worship God.

As the podcast made clear, though he apparently knew key facts related to the case, part of the reason Jay is such an interesting element of the story is that his testimony changed several times.

Julie McMahon has communicated some actual facts (you know, the type that can be backed up by court records and such) and people have expressed their opinion on the basis of those facts.

His shift from active to passive voice is difficult to detect unless one obsessively notices such things, but its effect on the reader is no less powerful for that fact.

It is funny where I say, «Knowing such a fact does not make us better Christians unless we can apply it.»

So here is where it gets spiritually profitable to know such a fact.

One of the greatest intellectual crises of our age, one with enormous practical implications, is the fact that most people simply do not believe that there are any universal principles of right and wrong, or, if there are such principles, that we can know them sufficiently to demand adherence to them.

The fact the so called «Liberals» oppose factual information (such as sonograms) being provided to women considering abortion proves that they know full well that they are engaged in murder.

I know that the New Yorker no longer employs fact - checkers, but couldn't the New York Times find at least one that could save their executive editor from making such colossally stupid claims?)

The sum of the treasures of knowledge and culture has increased to such a degree that the individual in the time available in one lifetime can no longer have any direct contact with the whole of the benefits of civilization available nowadays and which are in fact known and enjoyed by one person or another.

But do not make the mistake of trying to prove to other men that you have found God; you can not consciously produce such valid proof, albeit there are two positive and powerful demonstrations of the fact that you are God - knowing, and they are:

You are supposed to be in a relationship with the all powerful, all - knowing, all - loving creator of the universe... that «fact» should be enough to inspire such profound humility... the kind of humility that people genuinely respect and are influence by.

No more than anyone else should be accused of such things when they make statements of facts «as they know them.»

This is the only method we know of finds facts, such as existence or non-existence of things.

The fact that such an image did not appear is due to the factors that have been mentioned and no doubt to many others that have not.

Earlier, nothing was known about it except the fact that it was used by several heretical groups such as the Naassenes; some church writers denounced it but did not describe it.

It is hard to imagine that a «pro-life» person, knowing and understanding the facts, would not support such policies.

In philosophical theology, where the primary facts are the hard - core common - sense facts, the facts are already «known» unconsciously, in the sense of being presupposed in practice; but rational reflection can lead to the conscious knowledge of such principles.

The cultural role of such edifying philosophy is «to help us avoid the self - deception which comes from believing that we know ourselves by knowing a set of objective facts» (PMR 373).

There is probably no greater cause for the ease in which believers are being misled by the teachings of others (however well - intended and sincere such teachings may be), than the fact that they have for all practical purposes never been taught how to rightly divide the word of truth themselves.

But with the cultural exaltation of the Victoria's Secret brand and fashion show, the execs behind the fabricated lifestyle are banking on the fact that millions who don't know better will believe she does and purchase the bra that promises to transform them into such.

There are in fact such collections known to us, though of somewhat later date, and it is probable, as we have seen, that similar collections lay before the writers of the gospels.

You asked what FACTS I am referring to, well there are many FACTS such as the FACT that the earth is NOT 6000 years old, the FACT that there is NO evidence of a god, any god; the FACT that evolution is how we all got here; and the FACT that we were not CREATED by some sky daddy.

The strangely otherworldly or supernatural quality of these images arises of course at least in part from the simple fact that babies and toddlers do not usually sit poised and upright and do not often bear such a knowing wisdom in their eyes.