That means that
factor funds need to deliver not just superior performance, but performance that's sufficiently superior to overcome their cost disadvantage.
Not exact matches
Important
factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional
funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital
needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.
You
need a great idea, technical resources,
funding, good marketing, the right people and so on but the biggest
factor determining the success of a venture is its people.
Certain matters discussed in this news release are forward - looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties including, but not limited to, doubts about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern, the
need to obtain additional
funding, risks in product development plans and schedules, rapid technological change, changes and delays in product approval and introduction, customer acceptance of new products, the impact of competitive products and pricing, market acceptance, the lengthy sales cycle, proprietary rights of the Company and its competitors, risk of operations in Israel, government regulations, dependence on third parties to manufacture products, general economic conditions and other risk
factors detailed in the Company's filings with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
Whether you
need funds to fill cash flow gaps between when you invoice and when you receive payment or to finance the purchase or manufacture of goods or equipment, pay suppliers, meet payroll or other expenses,
Factor Funding Co can assist you with the capital you
need.
Factor Funding offers the financial services you may
need.
Sure there are other
factors you
need to consider, but nothing can kill your returns more than mutual
funds with front or back - end loads and high management fees.
It is possible to trade offshore, however, any trader doing so would
need to consider the exchange rate
factors because of the fluctuations that arise due to
funding your account in other currencies besides the Australian currency.
Factor Funding Company works with small and medium - size companies nationwide to provide invoice factoring solutions to businesses that
need to convert uncollected receivables into working capital.
Factor Funding Co understands this which is why we offer consulting company invoice factoring solutions that turn receivables into the cash a company
needs to grow without adding additional debt.
Factor Funding Co has created unique factoring services to meet the
needs of companies like yours in the energy services industry.
Factor Funding Co. can turn your accounts receivables into working the working capital you
need to attract new business opportunities and grow.
As we read this history, the furor over stem cells was fueled by numerous
factors: the near - universal human desire for magic; patients» desperation in the face of illness and their hope for cures; the belief that biology can now do anything; the reluctance of scientists to accept any limits (particularly moral limits) on their research; the impact of big money from biotech stocks, patents, and federal
funding; the willingness of America's elite class to use every means possible to discredit religion in general; and the
need to protect the unlimited abortion license by accepting no protections of unborn human life.
Top - up
funding can also reflect costs that relate to the facilities
needed to support a pupil's or student's education and training
needs (either for individuals or on offer to all), and can take into account expected place occupancy levels and other
factors, see section How place
funding and top up
funding work together.
«A special
fund for the injured, the orphans and widows of our fallen soldiers
need also to be
factored in.
County Executive notes effects of heavy winter,
need to begin work soon as
factors behind additional
funding
«These studies from AAIC 2014 underscore the
need to
fund larger, longer - term studies in different and diverse populations to enable us to develop helpful «prescriptions» for lifestyle change — for example, which foods to eat and avoid, how much physical activity and what types — and to learn more specifically about how Alzheimer's and dementia risk
factors change as we age,» Snyder added.
Unfortunately,
funds, time, and other
factors often prevent us from taking those fun trips, but this should not prevent you from getting the much -
needed -LSB-...]
When all this is
factored into a growing population, threats to public
funding and an increasing shortage of available land for development, the challenges for those with the responsibility to plan, design and deliver school places are significant and there has never been a greater
need for innovative solutions.
7) Reasonable
funding levels based on the
needs of particular student enrollments and other
factors outside of district control, but also discretion by local district taxpayers to augment the
funding of their schools.
Individual schools would receive federal
funds based on student counts, with a weighting formula to adjust for
factors such as the increased burden of educating high -
need students and for regional differences in costs.
The institutional dimension of culturally responsive pedagogy emphasizes the
need for reform of the cultural
factors affecting the organization of schools, school policies and procedures (including allocation of
funds and resources), and community involvement.
A state's eligibility policy must balance accountability for public
funds with the
need to provide efficient and flexible processes for program staff in documenting risk
factors.
The DCPS
funding formula does differentiate public
funding based on the number of students at each grade level and in different special
needs categories, including special education, English language learners, and those «at risk» for academic failure.38 DCPS would not disclose how or if it
factors in parental donations when determining school budgets or allocations.39 However, it did report not having a policy to equitably redistribute parent donations or to prohibit these additional dollars from being put toward staffing.40
Designed to identify the level of
funding needed to deliver an adequate education to every student in a state and sensitive to each child's
needs, the Evidenced Based Model ensures that the distribution of education
funding is equitable, and accounts for the cost of overcoming «at risk»
factors.
The intent of California's Local Control
Funding Formula (LCFF) is to give districts more flexibility with their state funding but at the same time to create a new school finance system that recognizes that students with specific demographic factors need greater support to address their academic needs and improve educational outcomes: English Learners, low income students and foster
Funding Formula (LCFF) is to give districts more flexibility with their state
funding but at the same time to create a new school finance system that recognizes that students with specific demographic factors need greater support to address their academic needs and improve educational outcomes: English Learners, low income students and foster
funding but at the same time to create a new school finance system that recognizes that students with specific demographic
factors need greater support to address their academic
needs and improve educational outcomes: English Learners, low income students and foster youth.
The law was passed in 2015 and in 2017 states drafted their plans, which included new accountability systems based on multiple measures that include
factors other than test scores; conducting
needs assessments for struggling schools and learning communities facing the greatest challenges in order to tailor support and intervention when
needed; developing clear and concise plans for targeting federal
funding in ways that meet the
needs of students in the school; and implementing programs and monitoring their progress in collaboration with educators.
Consider this: according to Education Resource Group and data from the Texas Education Agency, aggregate public education
funding from all sources over the past 14 years has increased by $ 70 billion more than the increase necessary to fully
fund the growth in enrollment and inflation combined over this period, even when adding a
factor for the increase in special
needs students.
The
funding reform commission is responsible for taking a number of
factors into account including local capacity to support schools, regional differences in associated costs and a variety of student characteristics that impact educational
needs.
Schools
need additional
funds for assessment, staffing of teachers who are trained in serving ELL students, specialized staff training, specialized materials, and time and space
factors.
The main paper on High
Needs funding arrangements stated that the second consultation will cover detailed factor weightings, the impact for LAs, transitional protection, the distribution of post-16 high needs funding including proxy indicators and how to recognise that some SEND would not be captured by any pro
Needs funding arrangements stated that the second consultation will cover detailed
factor weightings, the impact for LAs, transitional protection, the distribution of post-16 high
needs funding including proxy indicators and how to recognise that some SEND would not be captured by any pro
needs funding including proxy indicators and how to recognise that some SEND would not be captured by any proxies.
And the High
Needs funding technical note also mentions «values and weightings for the various
factors and adjustments, more detail on how the formula would work in practice and the impact, including the arrangements for transitional protection.»
It will still be able to run a local formula using the same
factors as now, to help it redistribute some
funding like rates, PFI costs and pupil number growth where the
need might be slightly different to the assumptions in the national formula.
Many states now base their school
funding systems on education adequacy studies that assess the cost of education, including those
factors that affect the cost, such as: state mandates and standards, services for students with additional
needs, and geographic differences in cost.
As a result, the estimated effect of resources is confounded by other
factors (such as student
need) and may not identify the true causal effect of additional
funding.
Granted, this data may be affected by a number of different
factors — merit - based scholarships do not typically take family income into account, for instance — but the research is upsetting enough to leave some educators and families wondering whether universities are targeting and enticing wealthy students with scholarship aid, while not offering as much
funding to students in
need.
But they are inherently oversimplified (and could cause problems as a result) because they only
factor in your presumed time horizon before the
funds are
needed.
Your asset allocation should depend on
factors such as your risk tolerance, age or time until the
funds are
needed, personal circumstances, and your goals.
For those wanting a more hands - on approach, there are three
factors that impact your ability to use SMI strategies with a relatively small portfolio: how much is required to buy the recommended
funds used in the strategy, how much is
needed to open an account at a broker where the strategy can be easily implemented, and how much it costs to buy and sell those
funds.
If you want to borrow additional
funds using your home as security, depending on certain
factors (including the additional amount you want to borrow, the current amount owing on your existing mortgage and the value of your home), you may
need to pay fees to discharge your existing mortgage and register a new one.
In theory, even if the above
factors are in place, you
need to be aware that share dealing and working with a stockbroker is a risky business and is more dangerous than purchasing shares through investment
funds such as investment trusts.
Efficient Advisors» portfolio models will deploy Dimensional's mutual
funds to build
factor - based portfolios at various levels of risk so advisers can address their clients» goals and
needs.
Shifting towards index
funds, ETFs, and
factor - based investing means fewer people
needed to run the
funds and more computers.
Further
need to know whether ICICI prudential long term debt
fund is fine to invest for 5 years or so with some reasonable (9/10 %) return and lower risk
factor?
If you decide you want 10 % of your wealth in cash, and when you
factor in your emergency
fund, you have 20 % in cash, you either
need to: adjust your allocation template, or FIX your misallocated cash.
Also
factor your loss of income, the
funds needed to pay for your children's college education and the annual cost of living for the people in your household.
That is, say, your business
needs $ 50K for raising the working capital and you are being paid this
funding through the MCAwithout much paperwork and without the
need for a collateral, for which your repayment would be decided based on the
factor rate provided by the MCA lender, which we can assume here to be 1.2.
Even if you can estimate correctly how long you are going to own an ETF instead of a mutual
fund, you still
need to
factor in growth to get an accurate estimate.
There are other
factors that you can consider when picking a
fund, but you don't
need to make it any more complicated than it already is.
The more «
factors» you decide to apply to decrease your necessary monthly expenses, the longer of a term I think you'd
need as an Emergency
Fund.