EFA on these four indicators yielded a one factor solution with
factor loadings ranging from.60 to.79, which supports the feasibility of constructing a composite score.
The remaining three items loaded on a unique factor of preventive courtship, with
factor loadings ranging between 0.80 and 0.98.
For the connectedness domain, the CFI was.98, the TLI.99, and the RMSEA.05, with
factor loadings ranging from.70 to.92.
For the social and emotional development domain, the CFI was.96, the TLI.98, the RMSEA.05, and
factor loadings ranged from.59 to.90.
Results showed high level of Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient α = 0.90, test retest reliability ranged from r =.73 to r =.96 (ps <.01), item total correlation varying from r =.50 to r =.74 (ps <.01) and
factor loading ranged from.39 to.73.
Its factor loading ranged from.53 to.79 and item total correlation varied from.47 to.74.
Not exact matches
The broad
range of configurable
load cell interface modules with direct field bus connectivity or analogue output feature a small form
factor, plug - and - play installation, integrated diagnostics and ATEX certified versions.
The broad
range of configurable
load cell interface modules with direct fieldbus connectivity or analog output feature a small form
factor, plug - and - play installation, integrated diagnostics and ATEX versions.
However, in terms of extending the distance of wireless power, CMRS, for example, has revealed technical limitations to commercialization that are yet to be solved: a rather complicated coil structure (composed of four coils for input, transmission, reception, and
load); bulky - size resonant coils; high frequency (in a
range of 10 MHz) required to resonate the transmitter and receiver coils, which results in low transfer efficiency; and a high Q
factor of 2,000 that makes the resonant coils very sensitive to surroundings such as temperature, humidity, and human proximity.
The other seven items
loaded on the second
factor, with weights
ranging from.640 to.771.
Ten survey items
loaded on the first
factor, with weights
ranging from.707 to.867.
This allows the engine to operate with an optimal power - efficiency
factor in any
load range, thereby lowering fuel consumption.
Use our interior designer resume template for Word and the examples below to create an impeccable work history section.Interior Designer — ABC Designs — Boston, MA — 9/2013 to Current • Work within a team of six to design and decorate the interiors of commercial properties of varying industries and sizes, undertaking up to five projects at a time • Coordinate and oversee construction, deliveries, plumbing and electrical work, and installations • Exceed annual company profit targets by 10 percent with increased referrals from satisfied customers • Utilize computer - aided drafting, technical drawing, and other design software to successfully confer with clients and project partnersInterior Designer — Joann's Interior Design Company — Boston, MA — 7/2009 to 9/2013 • Provided quotes and secured contracts for residential interior design jobs
ranging from modest to extravagant design themes and budgets • Regulated and stocked inventories of supplies, materials, and equipment to avoid project delays • Ensured that building codes, plumbing, electricity,
load - bearing walls and other structural components were taken into consideration for every assignment • Supervised an average of six projects at a time and consulted with clients on a weekly basis to determine preferences in lighting, furniture, color arrangements, and other design
factors
Factor loadings were high, ranging for factor 1 from 0.54 to 0.8, for factor 2 from 0.63 to 0.86 and finally for factor 3 from 0.5 to 0.83 (Tab
Factor loadings were high,
ranging for
factor 1 from 0.54 to 0.8, for factor 2 from 0.63 to 0.86 and finally for factor 3 from 0.5 to 0.83 (Tab
factor 1 from 0.54 to 0.8, for
factor 2 from 0.63 to 0.86 and finally for factor 3 from 0.5 to 0.83 (Tab
factor 2 from 0.63 to 0.86 and finally for
factor 3 from 0.5 to 0.83 (Tab
factor 3 from 0.5 to 0.83 (Table 3).
However, all paths coefficients estimated in the model were statistically significant at p <.01, standardized
loadings ranging from.20 to.76 across the three
factors.
On the other hand, while some of the items
loaded significantly onto the methods
factor, the vast majority of the items were not significant and the average
loading size on the method
factor was 0.18 (
range from.00 to.35).
Examination of
factor loadings showed that they
ranged from.47 to.67.
A principle components analysis using a varimax rotation and no fixed number of
factors showed that each of the seven facilitative courtship items contributed to a single
factor with item
loadings ranging between 0.71 and 0.88.
The one
factor solution with high
factor loadings (from.64 to.84) indicated that this was the case; thus, a composite score for harsh parenting was computed (alphas
ranged from.73 to.81).
Factor loadings were all statistically significant (p < 0.05) and standardized
loadings ranged between 0.68 and 0.93.
Standardized
factor loadings for the 5 -
factor configuration (Fig 1)
ranged from 0.46 < β < 0.74 (conduct problems), 0.39 < β < 0.80 (hyperactivity), 0.51 < β < 0.86 (emotional problems), 0.44 < β < 0.61 (peer problems), and 0.55 < β < 0.72 (prosocial).