These emission factors are based on the mix of coal consumed and the basic emission
factors by coal rank and State of origin.
Therefore, emission factors by consuming sector in each State were derived by weighting the emission
factors by coal rank and State of origin by the respective amounts received by sector.
EIA's first reported emission
factors by coal rank, published in Electric Power Annual 1990, DOE / EIA -0348 (90)(Washington, DC, January 1992), p. 124, were as follows: anthracite, 209; bituminous coal, 209; subbituminous coal, 219; and lignite, 213.
Not exact matches
And if all our oil, natural gas, and
coal resources are burned, «that could raise CO2 levels
by a
factor of ten,» says Tans.
However, emission
factors for Chinese
coal were on average 40 per cent lower than the default levels recommended
by the IPCC.
It is cheap because the environmental damage caused
by coal burning isn't
factored into the price.
«The war on
coal» waged
by the Obama administration, along with a variety of other
factors, have resulted in the sector being decimated over the last 12 months.
In fact the increase in
coal burning
by China from 2002 — 2012 is implicated as one contributory
factor in the so called temperature pause, but not a huge one.
It is the largest
coal mine methane - to - electricity proejct in the U.S.
by a
factor of 20 — there is a 150 kilowatt project in Pennsylvania also operated
by Vessels.
By the time third world countries actually build substantial additional electricity generation, the world could be nearing the limits of
coal supply, especially if you
factor in projected population growth and increased consumption.
Factor in the «carbon light» CO2 from
coal seam gas projects in the East (and other LNG expansion in the north and west) and you're talking about Australia's fossil fuel emission exports equating to TWO Saudi Arabias
by 2020, not one as I've been saying to many disbelieving ears.
Factor these in and Australia may well treble rather than double its
coal exports
by 2020.
[D] espite additions of substantial wind, solar, and nuclear capacity, when properly adjusted for capacity
factor (the amount of annual energy produced per unit of capacity) to reflect production capability, the amount of new
coal energy added to the China grid last year exceeded new solar energy
by 17 times, new wind energy
by more than 4 times, and even new hydro
by more than 3 times.
And yet another researcher began to examine the costs of petrol, or
coal, or methane gas if the long - term economic damage and health costs were
factored in, and concluded that these made «expensive» renewables cheap
by comparison.
No matter how forceful industry lobbying, the market
factors simply dictate that nuclear and
coal power plants should be replaced
by cheaper, cleaner, and safer solar and wind power.
The campaign will demonstrate that supply of
coal is severely limited
by social and economical
factors, making it a dead investment in the medium and long term.
Nuclear power would provide many other benefits as well: energy security, reliable energy supply, reduce shipping costs and energy used in shipping
coal by a
factor of 20,000 to 2 million, provide fresh water, no need for carbon pricing, avoid 1 million fatalities per year
by 2050,... https://judithcurry.com/2012/08/17/learning-from-the-octopus/#comment-231867.
To me the characterization of reports and presentations as «myths» that challenge the continued investment in high risk energy sources and designated so
by someone with their feet firmly planted in oil and
coal reserves, is not respectful disagreement but propaganda and a contributing
factor in the stalling of «the drive to clean up the world's energy system.»
UBS estimates that the load
factor of lignite (brown
coal) plants in Germany drops from 72 % to 59 %, while the load
factor of hard
coal plants drops from 47 % to 31 %
by 2020.
On this page...
Coal gasification
Coal liquefaction
Coal - seam gas
Factors in oil supply Links Oil reserve estimates
by the USA Oil shale Peak oil Reduce your dependence on oil Related pages Self - sufficiency Tar sands Top Unconventional liquid fuel sources
To be sure, the mandates aren't the only reason that electricity costs are rising — increased regulation of
coal - fired power plants is also a major
factor — and it is difficult to isolate the cost of the renewable mandates without rigorous cost - benefit analysis
by the states.
Another
factor, the report says, is the growing share of energy provided
by coal, the dirtiest of the mainstream fuels.
Apart from the emissions
factor, how could anyone support the damage done to our country
by coal mining (as seen in this and the above photo) compared to benign wind farms and solar power stations?
Ultimately,
coal can not be considered «clean» when you
factor in the air and water pollution generated
by coal mining, preparation, transport and combustion.
After accounting for all the methane leakage
factors mentioned
by the Post, the NETL study clearly demonstrates that life cycle GHG emissions from LNG exports from the U.S. are significantly less than emissions from
coal generated electricity in China and in Europe.
If a US
coal unit installs control technologies to meet the most stringent air pollution regulation, it could increase operating costs
by 13 % when the capacity
factor declines from 60 % to 40 %.
CSE also recommends enacting CEA's plan to retire 48 GW of India's oldest
coal generation
by 2027, allowing cleaner distributed electricity sources to meet India's power demand while raising capacity
factors for newer «cleaner»
coal plants, simultaneously reducing financial risks for utilities and consumers.
Environmental regulatory requirements may have been the straw that broke a baseload's camel's back — particularly for
coal plants — but it appears that most baseload plants were already burdened
by the effects of low natural gas prices, eroding customer demand, and lower capacity
factors before the incremental burden of new regulations tipped the balance over to retirement.»
Consumption of
coal in China has already grown
by a
factor of three from 2000 to 2013.
New electricity generated
by coal - fired plants will outstrip that which was retired in 2015 and 2016
by a
factor of five.
On the other hand, it is reasonable to assume that natural market
factors will gradually result in a reduction of ever more expensive fossil fuel combustion as older
coal - fired power plants are shut down and replaced
by nuclear plants, as hybrid and electrical cars gradually replace gasoline and diesel driven ones, and as energy efficiency is improved and waste reduced.
WASHINGTON (October 10, 2017)-- Despite political rhetoric to the contrary and recent actions
by the Trump administration, the market reality is that
coal - fired power has become increasingly uneconomic and is the main
factor driving the U.S. electricity sector to rapidly transition away from
coal.
[3] Each state has interim targets it must meet beginning in 2020, and the EPA proposed that states use a combination of four «building blocks» to achieve the emissions reductions: (1) improving the efficiency (heat rate) of existing
coal - fired power plants; (2) switching from
coal - fired power
by increasing the use and capacity
factor, or efficiency, of natural - gas combined - cycle power plants; (3) using less carbon - intensive generating power, such as renewable energy or nuclear power; and (4) increasing demand - side energy - efficiency measures.
For instance, using the emission
factor for
coal from IPCC [48],
coal resources given
by the Global Energy Assessment [114] amount to 7300 — 11000 Gt C. Similarly, using emission
factors from IPCC [48], total recoverable fossil energy reserves and resources estimated
by GEA [114] are approximately 15000 Gt C.
The significant decrease in
coal used to produce electricity can be attributed to three
factors: overall lower electricity demand; a fuel shift to natural gas; and an offset created
by more wind power production, according to Simon.
The oil used for transporting
coal would be reduced
by a
factor of about 20,000 for every tonne of oil moved because the energy density of nuclear fuel is about 1/20, 000 of
coal.
«Wind and solar's «capacity
factor» or availability to supply power is around 33 %, which means 67 % of the time wind and solar can not supply power and must be supplemented
by a traditional energy source such as nuclear, natural gas or
coal.
Compared to emissions from
coal, «cutting emissions
by a
factor of two or three hardly makes a difference,» he said.
While it is hard to give the Obama administration credit for all of these
factors, it was instrumental in several of them, especially the quantum jump in CAFE standards, the development and deployment of more renewables and the ongoing pressure on
coal plants
by the EPA.
Wind power is 42 % more expensive than nuclear and natural gas power... Wind and solar's» «capacity
factor» or availability to supply power is around 33 %, which means 67 % of the time wind and solar can not supply power and must be supplemented
by a traditional energy source such as nuclear, natural gas or
coal.»
The greenhouse gas pollution of
coal - fired power plants is another huge cost that is not
factored into the price of electricity (even though 50 % of our power in the US comes from
coal), and the same goes for the air pollution caused
by the burning of petroleum.
point (b) Clearly there are enough wind and solar resources world wide to replace
coal and oil
by at least a
factor of X10 (wind) to X1000 (for solar).
EIA's carbon dioxide emission
factors by consuming sector and State will be updated periodically to reflect changes in the mix of U.S.
coal consumption.
The (arithmetic) average emission
factors obtained from the individual samples (assuming complete combustion)(Table FE4)(10) confirm the long - recognized finding that anthracite emits the largest amount of carbon dioxide per million Btu, followed
by lignite, subbituminous
coal, and bituminous
coal.
First are basic emission
factors covering the various
coal ranks
by State of origin.
Second are emission
factors for use in estimating carbon dioxide emissions from
coal consumption
by State, with consuming - sector detail.
The emission
factors vary significantly
by coal rank, confirming a long - recognized finding, and also within each rank
by State of origin.
EIA's emission
factors will improve the accuracy of estimates of carbon dioxide emissions, especially at State and regional levels, because they reflect the difference in the ratio of carbon to heat content
by rank of
coal and State of origin.
It appears to me that the elephant is
Coal, at 3 times the size of third - running Wind, which itself is handicapped
by a much lower capacity
factor of another
factor of 4 or so.
Furthermore, because data on the origin and destination of
coal are available only for
coal distribution, EIA's emission
factors for
coal consumption
by sector assume that the mix of
coal received during a certain year was the same as that consumed in that year.